What should follow in the lower right corner?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Holy shit man, how did you realize that?
Log in to reply
lol, it's a nice way to say that when both colors are different equals blue, when they are the same equal white
Log in to reply
but it doesn't work for white+white. if only horizontal matches are taken into account then there is no clue for white+white combination. all the assumptions fit vertical alignment and white+white = blue (2nd column). this puzzle is flawed.
how can one think this!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Log in to reply
Takes practice and as well as time to acquire the skills
i don't understand..... please tell me with the simple answer
Log in to reply
The way to solve it is to look at the first two images in each row and compare the two to one another. Where they are the same, a white segment is shown in the third image. Where they differ is shown by blue instead.
Log in to reply
but in the third row, in both images, the second circle is full, that would change the patter, the answer would be a image with only the first circle white (the one on the outside), wouldn't it?
Marxam serket , u r awesome...
Check my answer.
Damn. I was getting close but gave up too soon. Had just gotten to thinking in ons and offs
If the middle circle is equal to one and counting up going to the edge with the outer ring equal to 4, than the sum of each row is ten and the answer is D
Same. I thought about it like that, but not the binary part. I thought of it like white was the 1 and blue was the 0. If there was a white and a blue, it would "convert" the blue into a white. If there were two whites those would make a blue. So using that logic (not sure if you could call it that hehe) what is the next pattern needed so that if you were to stack them all on top of each other, it would make all white. I know this might not make much sense but that's how I understood it.
Boooo! This isn't logic. It's more like trivia.
Wow, this is brilliant indeed. You learn something new everyday. Thanks for this. First time to consider answering a problem with this method. :)
From first two rows, we can get the rule of white + blue = blue blue + white = blue blue + blue = white
However, we do not know white + white =blue and no reason to use this as a rule. If we use it, it would be nothing than a naive guess. So I find this solution and the resulting is incomplete.
How about this, Look at vertically and move white rings from outer to one step inner. If it is already in the most inner one, move it to the most outer. Thus we have, blue + blue = blue white + blue = white blue + white = white white + white = white (because we moved the innermost white to outermost) If we apply this to third column, we get inverse of the A. Just a different point of view.
But what if u say that blue is zero and white is 1,2,3,4 depending on the position(center 1, outer line 4)... Then the second row has the same sum of whites as the first row - 10. The first two figures in row 3 have the sum of 9, so to have the value of 1 in the last figure, we would have to pick the answer D.
How did you think of that!!
Your pattern is correct in logic binary and in Xor cage, acting like logic "either/or", but does work ONLY setting Blue=1 and White=0, the other way round, it doesn't work. By the way, I easily prefer to consider blue ring like "minus" and the white one like "plus". The pattern quickly can be figured out with product Blue*White ( - * +). The result is the same an faster to understand. Blue * Blue = - * - = + Blue * White = - * + = - White * Blue = - * + = - White * White = + * + = +
Consider blue to be "True" and white to be "False." In an XOR truth table, the output is considered true if only one input of the two are true (i.e. true + true = false, true + false = true, false + false = false). Therefore, for the first row outer most ring, blue (true) + white (false) = blue (true). For the first row, second ring from the outer most, blue (true) + blue (true) = white (false).
Look at rows 1,2, and 3. Overlapping the three circles in Row 1 would create a FULLY white circle. Overlapping the circles in the second row again makes a full white circle so the third should also form a white circle so the answer is A
this logic may go wrong. Because even if you consider column wise, by merging all three diagrams in either of 1st and 2nd column you will get complete white circle. Whereas u don't find a suitable solution for the 3rd column. This is a easy solution, whereas people may go wrong if they go column wise. Whereas the XOR is the solution, it has been explained in the other comment.
Log in to reply
It asks people to find the pattern. He did find a pattern. the fact that there is not an answer available that meets what is needed for the pattern indicates that it is not the pattern that is being looked for, however that does not invalidate the pattern that was found.
I'm confused by the insistence that rows are what should be looked at to make the patterns, it's a grid, and rows, columns, diagonals, etc should all be looked at.
i like this so much
I want to point out the illogicity of row logic without column logic. This should not be a matrix but three independent rows with clear start and end arrows. Yes I know English reads from right to left but other languages go backwards and up to down and down to up are equally valid directions.
Further, one has to solve the problem of mixing. W+W=W. B+B=W. W+B=B. B+W=B. Both=W. Mix=B. Hence the XOR logic.
A quick check shows that applying these rules to the last column will not work.
Log in to reply
You see there I go! Left to right, of course. Unless you stand on your head. Standing on rear feet is only one way of standing! Ask any angry skunk!
The XOR logic works when moving across a row (left-right) using the 1st and 2nd column to get the 3rd items but fails when you move vertically(up-down) using the 1st and 2nd row to get the 3rd item
I'll leave my solution seeing as nobody did what I did or at least posted it.
From the first two rows, I noticed that you get the third column by checking whether the particular level has the same colors on the first two rows. If so, that particular level will be white on the third column, otherwise (meaning it will have different colors on the first and second column), it will be blue.
Looking at the third row:
Column 1 has WBWB (starting from the innermost level outward)
Column 2 has BWWB therefore
Column 3 has BBWW which is A.
Hopefully I helped.
How do figure out the first and second columns?
Thank you very good solution
COol solution..The only one I understand
Also, this is the sa,e thing as the first solution..XOR of first two columns is 1 if they have different vaues, and is 0 if they have diff values..
Horizontally similar colors gives white circle , and diffrent gives blue , like that
blue + white = blue
blue + blue = white
white + white = white
Cool. At least this is the most understandable solution for me
your hypothesis cannot be applied on the 2nd and 3rd row
Log in to reply
You Are Right it cannot be applied to 2nd & third row
My logic was much simpler then anybody else's. Just notice that each row or column has one white ring in the center, one in the middle and one on the outer edge. If you see the third row or column the only one which was missing was the outer white ring. And A was the only one with the white ring on the outer edge. Just took me less than a minute to solve this one. Cheers!
That's basically how I was able to figure it out. I sort of made up a theory relating to this puzzle called "One step away from each other".
THE MOST SIMPLIFIED SOLUTION
In every row there is a white centered circle and 2 blue circles;
and a white peripheral ring and 2 blue peripheral rings
The 3rd row requires a blue centered circle with a blue peripheral ring
So the answer is: A :D
I started by labeling all rings that are blue as numbers in a set starting from the outermost ring being 1 and the inner most ring being 4. Here is my labeling of the sets.
A | B | C | |
1 | { 1 , 2 , 4 } | { 2 , 3 } | { 1 , 3 , 4 } |
2 | { 2 , 3 , 4 } | { 1 , 3 } | { 1 , 2 , 4 } |
3 | { 1 , 3 } | { 1 , 4 } | ? |
Eventually I noticed that column C in rows 1 and 2 are a product of A ∪ B − ( A ∩ B ) which uses Set Intersection , Set Subtraction, and Set Union . Thus making row 3 column C have the value { 3 , 4 } .
This is just how I came to the solution, and in this case atleast it is logically equivalent to the xor method as they will be included in the set (i.e. turned on, made 1, made blue) by definition of my sets by if they are blue, then they will be excluded from the set (i.e. turned off, made 0, made white) by being either being both white which excludes them from being added in the first place by A ∪ B , or they will be excluded from the set by both being blue thus being excluded by subtracting the set A ∩ B .
Picture the left square and middle square on top of one another. The one on the left has the second ring blue and the middle on has the first ring blue so we know that the right one has to have the first and second rings blue. They both have the outermost ring blue so the right one needs to have the outer ring blank.
I just picked the one with white on the outside cuz the other rows had one with white on the outside and two with blue.
I got it with mixed reasoning (I pretty much guessed it). At first, I tried turning it into binary but I couldn't find the logical sequence there :3
What I thought of was the changing colours of the circles:
The white will move to inner levels if: - moving left to right - moving up to down
The white will move to outer levels if: -moving right to left - moving down to up
The only problem with this is the center of the circle. I just decided the center should be blue since the other two rows only had 1 white center :33 Any thoughts?
My answer was kinda simple. Basically, if all the white segments from the row are combined, they need to complete a white circle
Also, white may overlay with another white, so that'd leave A as the only answer
Each row needs to create a full withe circle. In the third row there are white circle on the second, third and fourth, but not for the first. So A is the only one with a withe circle in the first circle.
Seeing this complicated explanations I am a bit uncertain of mine. But here it is: I was looking for a circle with two whites because the lower left corner has it. This logic eliminates all but A and B. Then I eliminated B as it already apears in the middle in the bottom. Which left me with A as solution. Please comment if this was a pure coincidence or if it is a way to go.
I will explain my solution even though there is still one unexplained phenomena from my pov. However, I did get the answer correct.
First arrange the squares by their rings using a table of rows and columns: Row 1 - 8
Now, it is possible to draw diagonal lines through each successive pair of repeating colors. For example, notice the long diagonal connecting blue rings from Ring 3, R1 - Center, R4 (There's 4 blues in a row)
You can see the pattern more clearly now. It took work but what's going on is that the rings bounce from Ring3 towards the Center and back. Take the first square for example, it has a blue center and white ring nearest the center. So, the next square has a white center and blue nearest the center. This is because the blue center is moving away and the white ring is seeking the center. Again, Ring3 and Ring 2 in the first square are blue, so they will seek the center together and descend. This is why the 2nd square shows them still together but one ring closer to the center.
Every ring does this no matter the color, the rings seek the center then move away once they've arrived there. Sometimes colors descend and ascend into the same ring, when this happens I have not systematically found a solution to that final mystery. I think that if a color ascends or descends and there's no color there to take its place, then the abandoned ring will change its color to the opposite of what it was prior. Nevertheless, the bouncing fact alone is enough to take a good guess at the answer once the pattern is written out and understood.
This is how I visualized this:
For those who want a 'logical/binary' answer:
The above logic, in essence, is what XOR actually means: Here Blue is 1 and White is 0.
I simply looked at the blank, or white space and decided on whether it was (inner, outer, or middle) and used that to decide. The top row was inner, outer, middle. The second row was outer, middle, inner. So the bottom row must be middle, inner, OUTER.
I suppose you could have used the same logic, but for columns instead of rows. I just looked it over and it seems to add up that way as well. It's almost like a Soduko puzzle.
I didn't remember the XOR truth table so I use a more simplistic approach and I guess a less smart way to solve it but this is how i did it.
I saw the patterns for row number one and two by seeing it as outer ring, middle ring, inner ring and the center circle, I did thought of it like it was the solar system.
The first row I saw it like this: The first square has the inner ring white; the second square has the outer ring and center circle white; the third square has the middle ring white which was the last ring left to become white. So I applied that logic to the second row the last ring left to become white was the inner ring.
The third row was interesting because the second square has the middle and inner ring white so it repeat the middle ring from the first square but I knew that the one left was the outer ring although I did doubt it.
I thought that the answer was the letter E because I thought that it was a different case from the first two rows and in this case the center circle would be white because in row number one and number two the squares one and three the center circles are blue so I saw the third row as an inverted case but even if that were the case it would break the pattern in row number one and two and the other answers were illogical according to that pattern so I choose letter A mainly because the outer ring follow that pattern.
This pattern can be applied from left to right, right to left, up to down and down to up.
Similar to Chee's answer, you can think of the circle colors like light switches. Blue (flipping switch on) + Blue (flipping switch again) turns light off. Blue + White or White + Blue turns light on. White + White leaves light off.
Every row has at least one white ring at the bottom, A is the only option with a white ring at the bottom.
My 10 year old son worked this out ... I still don't get it.
The white is always where there was no white before.
XOR truth table (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusive_or)
Input A | InputB | Output | |
A | B | ||
0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 1 | 1 | |
1 | 0 | 1 | |
1 | 1 | 0 |
R O W − A | R O W − B | R O W − C | |||
C O L − A | 1( B ) | 1( B ) | 0( W ) | 1( B ) | 0( W ) | 1( B ) | 1( B ) | 1( B ) | 1( B ) | 0( W ) | 1( B ) | 0( W ) | ||
C O L − B | 0( W ) | 1( B ) | 1( B ) | 0( W ) | 1( B ) | 0( W ) | 1( B ) | 0( W ) | 1( B ) | 0( W ) | 0( W ) |1( B ) | ||
C O L − C | 1( B ) | 0( W ) | 1( B ) | 1( B ) | 1( B ) | 1( B ) | 0( W ) |1( B )) | 0( W ) | 0( W ) | 1( B ) | 1( B ) |
When the image that has the white circle in the middle and a ring at one point in the outer circle is shown, the second one after that will have the outer ring selected of the one it was. And the next tie this happens the ring before and now will be selected.
I turned them into binary and it gave me this :
ROW 1 (10-11 01-10 11-01) ROW 2 (11-10 01-01 10-11) ROW 3 (01-01 10-11 _ - _)
So I checked the relationships and noticed: If you add the first number of the first two columns of ROW 1, the result matches the first number in the third column of that same row. If you subtract the second number of the the second column of ROW 1 it matches the second number of the third column in that row. But in the ROW 2 it works if you inverse which pair you add and which pair you subtract. Ie you subtract the first numbers (01 from 11), and add the second numbers (10 and 1). And that makes it match the third column of that row. So in the third row I used the pattern that was bound to come again, ie that of the first row. It matched answer A. I thought it was a good time to give up since it had already worked! It's probably similar to the explanation below about XOR tables
Just look at the rows and see if it contains a white outer ring, if not, there’s your answer.
Easiest way to think of this is to consider white=1 and blue= --1 Moving left to right in each row, compare the corresponding rings in the first two circles, and multiply their values to get the values of the corresponding rings of the third circle.
Starting with the outer rings of the top row, We have blue then white. --1(blue) ×1(white)= --1(blue)
Now let's try the bottom rows outer rings --1(blue) × --1(blue) = 1(white)
As you can see, all the circles follow this pattern so it's easy to confirm the answer is A.
To make it even simpler (visually) just think "If they are the same then white, if different then blue"
The remaining rings which should change into white would be the ones that did not change color in the the last two models. (Looking at 3 individual horizontal lines. Therefore, the answer is A.
Pattern follows two rules:
R1 A tiles shares exactly 1 shaded region with its neighbour
R2 Every tile is painted in 2 or more regions.
all circles in each horizontal line fills all the blue with white when joined
so the third one on the last row should fill the mmmm it's circle line on it's edge
very very and very simple i hardly took 15 seconds! look the inner most circle in each row(horizontal) are 2 blue and 1 white and like this each row outer most circles are 2 blue and 1 white according to this for third row option a follows .
It's very simple: you just have to understand the pattern in each line. It's a sum between the rows of the first two houses, resulting the third one.
The pattern says:
blue + blue = white
blue + white = blue
white + white = white
Look at rows 1,2, and 3. Overlapping the three circles in Row 1 would create a FULLY white circle. Overlapping the circles in the second row again makes a full white circle so the third should also form a white circle so the answer is A
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Turn them into binary, so for example for the first row with blue = 1, white = 0, you'll get :
1101-0110-1011
They follow the XOR truth table: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusive_or i.e the first & second columns are the input and the third column is the output
It applies to the second row of the question and if you do this for the third row you'll get the answer A.