Is the following sequence of steps valid? If no, which step is wrong?
Step 1 : Consider the following limit:
L = n → ∞ lim n 2 1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ + n
Step 2 : Verify that it is of the indeterminate form ∞ ∞ .
Step 3 : Apply L'hôpital's rule to get
L = n → ∞ lim 2 n 1 = 0 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Your Stolz-Cesaro proof is almost correct. It should be:
If n → ∞ lim b n a n is finite and is equal to L , then L = n → ∞ lim b n + 1 − b n a n + 1 − a n .
Very neat solution! +1
Log in to reply
Thank you! I have edited my solution to correct the Stolz-Cesaro proof.
Why assumed that , the derivative of (1+2+3+...+n)=1 is totally wrong?
Log in to reply
It is wrong because it is a discrete function and its derivative does not exist.
There is nothing wrong with step 1 and 2.
In step 3, applying l'Hôpital's rule as n → ∞ lim d x d n 2 d x d ( 1 + 2 + 3 + . . . + n ) is wrong. It should be as follows:
L = n → ∞ lim n 2 1 + 2 + 3 + . . . n = n → ∞ lim 2 n 2 n ( n + 1 ) = n → ∞ lim 2 n 2 n 2 + n Differentiate up and down. = n → ∞ lim 4 n 2 n + 1 Differentiate up and down again. = n → ∞ lim 4 2 = 2 1
Limit can also be obtained as follows:
L = n → ∞ lim 2 n 2 n 2 + n = n → ∞ lim ( 2 1 + 2 n 1 ) = 2 1
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
First of all, let's check whether the value of the limit obtained is correct.
In the sum of n, n², or n³ wiki, we saw that 1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ + n = 2 n ( n + 1 ) . We can substitute this in the problem.
L = n → ∞ lim n 2 1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ + n = n → ∞ lim 2 n 2 n ( n + 1 ) = n → ∞ lim 2 n n + 1 = n → ∞ lim 2 1 + n 1
When n → ∞ , we see that n 1 → 0 . Therefore L = 2 1 . The answer does not match with the answer obtained in the problem, so at least one of the steps in the problem is not valid.
There is nothing wrong in Step 1 . The limits exists, and we just found its value.
There is nothing wrong in Step 2 either. Both the numerator and the denominator tend to positive infinity. The limit is of the indeterminate form ∞ ∞ .
However Step 3 is wrong. Since L'hôpital's rule is generally defined for functions whose domain is real numbers and the function in the problem has domain of natural numbers, we cannot apply it directly. Moreover, while trying to apply L'hôpital's rule in Step 3, it is assumed that d n d ( 1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ + n ) = 1 , which is incorrect.
Instead, let us define a function f : R → R such that f ( x ) = 2 x 2 x ( x + 1 ) . We can now apply L'hôpital's rule.
x → ∞ lim f ( x ) = x → ∞ lim 2 x 2 x ( x + 1 ) = x → ∞ lim 4 x 2 x + 1 = x → ∞ lim 4 2 + x 1
When x → ∞ , we see that x 1 → 0 . Therefore lim x → ∞ = 4 2 = 2 1 .
Note that for every natural number n , f ( n ) is identical to the given expression in the problem: n 2 1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ + n . As x tends to + ∞ , we see that f ( x ) tends to 2 1 . So as n tends to + ∞ , f ( n ) also tends to 2 1 . Therefore L = 2 1 .
Alternatively, we can apply the Stolz–Cesàro theorem , which is a discrete version of L'hôpital's rule. It states that
if { a n } n ≥ 1 and { b n } n ≥ 1 are sequences of real numbers, and
if { b n } n ≥ 1 is a strictly monotonic divergent sequence, and
if n → ∞ lim b n a n is finite and is equal to L , then
n → ∞ lim b n a n = L = n → ∞ lim b n + 1 − b n a n + 1 − a n
In the given problem, a n = 1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ + n and b n = n 2 . Note that { b n } = n 2 is a strictly increasing and divergent sequence.
L = n → ∞ lim n 2 1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ + n = n → ∞ lim ( n + 1 ) 2 − n 2 ( 1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ + n + ( n + 1 ) ) − ( 1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ + n ) = n → ∞ lim 2 n + 1 n + 1 = n → ∞ lim 2 + n 1 1 + n 1
When n → ∞ , we see that n 1 → 0 . Therefore L = 2 1 .