What's so special about 1987?

( m 1987 m + 1987 ) m 1987 m + 1987 = ( n 7891 n + 7891 ) n 7891 n + 7891 (m^{1987}-m+1987)^{m^{1987}-m+1987} = (n^{7891}-n+7891)^{n^{7891}-n+7891}

Find the number of solutions to the Diophantine equation above?


Hint: Work in modular arithmetic using a small mod.

Details and Assumptions

If there are infinitely many solutions, input 1 -1 .


The answer is 0.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Jake Lai
Mar 1, 2015

We work in mod 7 to show that there are no solutions.

We know φ ( 7 ) = 6 \varphi(7) = 6 . Hence, taking mod 7 on both sides' bases,

m 1987 m + 1987 m c 1 φ ( 7 ) + 1 m + 7 c 2 1 1 ( m o d 7 ) m^{1987}-m+1987 \equiv m^{c_{1}\varphi(7)+1}-m+7c_{2}-1 \equiv -1 \pmod{7}

n 7891 n + 7891 n c 3 φ ( 7 ) + 1 n + 7 c 4 + 2 2 ( m o d 7 ) n^{7891}-n+7891 \equiv n^{c_{3}\varphi(7)+1}-n+7c_{4}+2 \equiv 2 \pmod{7}

The index of the LHS is always odd; as for the RHS, 2 k 1 , 2 , 4 ( m o d 7 ) 2^{k} \equiv 1,2,4 \pmod{7} for all k N k \in \mathbb{N} , so LHS will never be congruent to RHS.

Hence, there are 0 \boxed{0} solutions to the Diophantine equation.

Why did you specifically choose mod 7 ?

A Former Brilliant Member - 6 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Honestly, I have no idea.

Jake Lai - 6 years, 3 months ago

As pointed out by Calvin Lin, if LHS is a a a^{a} and RHS b b b^{b} (as in the Diophantine) then a = b a = b . Then, proceed with parity.

Jake Lai - 6 years, 3 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...