Define
f ( x ) = 2 1 tan ( 2 x ) + 4 1 tan ( 4 x ) + 8 1 tan ( 8 x ) + ⋯ .
Then f ( 8 3 π ) can be written as b π c a + d − e
If b a is in simplest form i.e. g cd ( a , b ) = 1 , and a , b , c , d , e ∈ N , find the value of a + b + c + d + e .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Did exactly the same way!
Did in both way as shown by calvin sir and Krishna sharma!
P ( n ) = c o s 2 n x c o s 2 n − 1 x . . . . c o s 2 x
l i m n → ∞ P ( x )
P ( n ) = 2 s i n 2 n x 2 s i n 2 n x c o s 2 n x c o s 2 n − 1 x . . . . . c o s 2 x
2 s i n x c o s x = s i n 2 x
thus we get(multiplying and divivding by 2 n times and applying the above identity in each step)
l i m n → ∞ P ( n ) = l i m n → ∞ 2 n s i n 2 n x s i n x
l i m n → ∞ P ( n ) = l i m n → ∞ 2 n 2 n x s i n 2 n x × 2 n x s i n x
l i m n → ∞ P ( n ) = x s i n x
Thus,
c o s 2 x c o s 2 2 x c o s 2 3 x . . . . . = x s i n x
l o g c o s 2 x + l o g c o s 2 2 x + l o g c o s 2 3 x + . . . . = l o g s i n x − l o g x
Differentiating,
− ( 2 1 t a n 2 1 + 4 1 t a n 4 1 + 8 1 t a n 8 1 + . . . . . . ) = c o t x − x 1
2 1 t a n 2 1 + 4 1 t a n 4 1 + 8 1 t a n 8 1 + . . . . . . . . . . . . = − c o t x + x 1
f ( x ) = x 1 − c o t x
f ( 8 3 π ) = 3 π 8 − c o t ( 2 π − 8 π )
f ( 8 3 π ) = 3 π 8 − t a n 8 π
t a n 2 x = 1 − t a n 2 x 2 t a n x
t a n 4 π = 1 − t a n 2 8 π 2 t a n 8 π
1 − t a n 2 8 π = 2 t a n 8 π
2 = t a n 2 8 π + 2 t a n 8 π + 1
1 + t a n 8 π = ± 2
t a n 8 π = 2 − 1 ( as in first quadrant)
f ( 8 3 π ) = 3 π 8 − ( 2 − 1 )
f ( 8 3 π ) = 3 π 8 + 1 − 2
Awesome Soln!
Here is similar but shorter method I want to share
f ( x ) = 2 1 t a n ( 2 x ) + 4 1 t a n ( 4 x ) …
Integrating
∫ f ( x ) = − l n ( c o s ( 2 x ) ) − l n ( c o s ( 4 x ) ) − …
∫ f ( x ) = − [ l n ( c o s ( 2 x ) . c o s ( 4 x ) . c o s ( 8 x ) … ) ]
We have an identity
c o s ( y ) . c o s ( 2 y ) . c o s ( 4 y ) … c o s ( 2 n − 1 y ) = 2 n s i n ( y ) s i n ( 2 n y )
Here y = 2 n x
We get
∫ f ( x ) = − l n ( 2 n s i n ( 2 n x ) s i n ( x ) )
Here n → ∞
∫ f ( x ) = − l n ( x s i n x )
Differentiating we finally get
f ( x ) = x 1 − c o t ( x )
f ( 8 3 π ) = 3 π 8 + 1 − 2
A faster approach is to recognize that we have a telescoping sum. Because 2 1 tan 2 x = 2 1 cot 2 x − cot x , we can see that the partial sums telescope to
− cot x + 2 n 1 cot 2 n x .
Then, taking limits as n → 0 , we obtain − cot x + x 1 .
This "explains" why the formula looks so strange, involving both a trigonometric value and an algebraic value.
Log in to reply
Thanks! For sharing I knew there are other approaches to the problem and I was interested in them that's why it was named as ' what's your approach '
Hey I got the negative of the answer, and then just assumed it was the negative of the correct answer and got 15. Like i got f(x)=cotx-1/x. How does that extra minus sign pop up?
Can you post your solution of how do you got cotx - 1/x? Thanx!
Log in to reply
I like everyone else integrated then derived. However i got that it was the derivative of the ln of the product of a bunch of cosines
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
A faster approach is to recognize that we have a telescoping sum. Because 2 1 tan 2 x = 2 1 cot 2 x − cot x , we can see that the partial sums telescope to
− cot x + 2 n 1 cot 2 n x .
Then, taking limits as n → ∞ , we obtain − cot x + x 1 .
We can thus evaluate that
f ( 8 3 π ) = 3 π 8 + 1 − 2 .
This "explains" why the formula looks so strange, involving both a trigonometric value and an algebraic value.