Which are Bases?

Algebra Level 2

Which of the following are "bases" in the way described?

  1. ( 2 , 3 ) (2,\,3) and ( 1 , 1 ) (-1,\,1) generate R 2 \mathbb{R}^2 over the real numbers .
  2. , 2 2 , 2 1 , 2 0 , 2 1 , 2 2 , \dots,\,2^{-2},\,2^{-1},\,2^0,\,2^1,\,2^2,\,\dots generate real numbers by using their binary representation over F 2 \mathbb{F}_2 .
  3. 1 1 and 2 \sqrt{2} generate the algebraic numbers over the rationals.
1 and 3 1 and 2 1, 2, and 3 2 1

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Henry Maltby
Jul 1, 2016

Only 1 1 works.

  1. ( 2 , 3 ) (2,\,3) and ( 1 , 1 ) (1,\,-1) could work as a basis, since any element of R 2 \mathbb{R}^2 can be expressed as a sum of (real) multiples of them in precisely one way. They would therefore work as "coordinates".
  2. This is a more interesting question, because it showcases a subtlety of linear sums. In particular, a binary representation for an irrational (or rational recurring) number is not a finite sum. Even if we were to allow non-finite sums, they in general would not make sense (in this case, a notion of convergence in real numbers) and here would allow for non-uniqueness. For instance, 0.999.. = 1 . But when only finite sums are permitted, not all real numbers can be expressed in such away; in particular, we only get the rational numbers whose denominators are a power of 2 2 (possibly 1 1 ). So there is no way the prescribed numbers could be a basis for the real numbers over the finite field of two elements.
  3. For instance, there is no rational linear combination of 1 1 and 2 \sqrt{2} to give 3 \sqrt{3} . Try proving this yourself!

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...