It is often difficult to compare the 'worth' of the research work done by two researchers. One way to quantify this is to use the number of citations. Currently, there are two indices which are used for this purpose.
h-index : A scientist has index if of his/her papers have at least citations each, and the other papers have no more than citations each.
g-index : Given a set of articles ranked in decreasing order of the number of citations that they received, the g-index is the (unique) largest number such that the top articles received (together) at least citations.
An author with publications has a h-index of and a g-index of . Which of these statements is always true?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Let the h index be n h .
Let the number of first n h papers be
c 1 ≥ c 2 ≥ c 3 ≥ ⋯ ≥ c n h ≥ n h and c n h + 1 < n h + 1
This means that ∑ i = 1 n h c i ≥ n h 2
Thus, the total number of citations for the first n h papers would at least be equal to n h 2 .
Thus, n h ≤ n g