This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
you must know that power (means strength) of x > l n x i.e x will dominate over l n x
so if x → 0 + and l n x → − ∞ then their product → 0
Log in to reply
We can reach the same result considering the series expansion for ln after changing it into exponential form. And yes, with that the question indeed becomes a 10 sec challenge!
YEAH,VEGETA SSJ2 IS THE STRONGEST.
@Hjalmar Orellana Soto : Hey there! Nice solution, thanks for posting it. +1! Keep up the good work.
But there were few formatting errors which I corrected. Just click toggle latex(in the menu on your profile pic) or click edit solution to see the changes made.
Try to use \lim instead of just typing "lim". Also, try using \displaystyle before the \lim expression to get a better view of it. For more information on latex, see the following guide: click here .
x → 0 + lim x x x x = e x ln ( x ) = e x ln ( x ) Apply a limit chain rule = x → 0 + lim e x ln ( x ) g ( x ) = x ln ( x ) , f ( u ) = e u = x → 0 + lim e x ln ( x ) ⇒ 0 Apply L’ Hopital’s rule = x → 0 + lim e u = 1
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
I still don't know how to do it in 10 seconds without knowing the graph xDD, but I did it this way (by using L'Hôpital's Rule): x → 0 + lim x x = x → 0 + lim e x ln x e ( lim x → 0 + x 1 ln x ) = e ⎝ ⎛ lim x → 0 + − x 2 1 x 1 ⎠ ⎞ e ( lim x → 0 + − x ) = e 0 = 1