sec ( 2 0 1 5 2 π ) + sec ( 2 0 1 5 4 π ) + sec ( 2 0 1 5 6 π ) + … + sec ( 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 4 π ) = ?
Bonus : Generalize the sum k = 1 ∑ n sec ( 2 n + 1 2 k π ) in terms of n with a proper derivation without using methods like Induction.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Let z = e i θ = x + i y . Then:
cos ( ( 2 n + 1 ) θ ) = R e ( z 2 n + 1 ) = k = 0 ∑ n ( 2 k 2 n + 1 ) x 2 ( n − k ) + 1 ( i y ) 2 k = k = 0 ∑ n ( − 1 ) k ( 2 k 2 n + 1 ) x 2 ( n − k ) + 1 ( 1 − x 2 ) k
which we denote as f ( x ) . It's easy to see that:
f ( x ) = a 2 n + 1 x 2 n + 1 + … + a 1 x 1 . . . ( 1 )
where
a 1 = ( − 1 ) n ( 2 n 2 n + 1 ) = ( − 1 ) n ( 2 n + 1 ) . . . ( 2 )
On the other hand, since cos ( ( 2 n + 1 ) θ ) = 2 1 ( z 2 n + 1 + z 2 n + 1 1 ) = 1 + 2 1 ( z 2 n + 1 + z 2 n + 1 1 − 2 )
= 1 + 2 z 2 n + 1 1 ( z 2 n + 1 − 1 ) 2 and
( z 2 n + 1 − 1 ) 2 = k = 0 ∏ 2 n ( z − e 2 n + 1 2 k π i ) 2 = k = 0 ∏ 2 n ( z − e 2 n + 1 2 k π i ) ( z − e 2 n + 1 − 2 k π i )
= k = 0 ∏ 2 n ( z 2 + 1 − 2 z cos ( 2 n + 1 2 k π ) )
We also have:
f ( x ) = 1 + 2 1 k = 0 ∏ 2 n ( z + z 1 − 2 cos ( 2 n + 1 2 k π ) )
= 1 + 2 2 n k = 0 ∏ 2 n ( x − 2 cos ( 2 n + 1 2 k π ) ) . . . ( 3 )
Now we compare the expressions ( 1 ) and ( 3 ) for f ( x ) . We see from ( 1 ) that the constant term in ( 3 ) is zero. Therefore:
2 2 n k = 0 ∏ 2 n cos ( 2 n + 1 2 k π ) = 1
Comparing the coefficients of x in ( 1 ) and ( 3 ) , and dividing by the product above (which equals 1), we get:
a 1 = k = 0 ∑ 2 n sec ( 2 n + 1 2 k π ) = 1 + 2 k = 1 ∑ n sec ( 2 n + 1 2 k π )
Setting the above expression for a 1 equal to the expression in ( 2 ) , we get:
k = 1 ∑ n sec ( 2 n + 1 2 k π ) = 2 ( − 1 ) n ( 2 n + 1 ) − 1
which equals n if n is even, and − ( n + 1 ) if n is odd.
Since our n for the problem is n = 1 0 0 7 , and since it's odd, the answer is − 1 0 0 8 .
Could u elaborate the fifth step from end
Log in to reply
In (1), the constant term in f(x) is zero as you can see. Therefore in (3) also the constant term of f(x) should be zero. That is it.
How do you think of such good mathematics questions?
Log in to reply
Well I had solved such a problem for n = 3 . I thought to generalize it. Then, I extended n = 3 to n = 1 0 0 7 , and that's it.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let S = k = 1 ∑ ( n − 1 ) / 2 sec ( n 2 π k ) where n is odd, w = e 2 π i / n , t = w + 1 / w = 2 cos ( n 2 π ) and P k = w k + 1 / w k = 2 cos ( n 2 π k ) .
Factoring w n = 1 we obtain: w n − 1 + w n − 2 + ⋯ + w + 1 = 0 , then divide by w ( n − 1 ) / 2 : w ( n − 1 ) / 2 + 1 / w ( n − 1 ) / 2 + w ( n − 3 ) / 2 + 1 / w ( n − 3 ) / 2 + ⋯ + w + 1 / w + 1 = 0 .
That expression is also P ( n − 1 ) / 2 + P ( n − 3 ) / 2 + ⋯ + P 1 + 1 = 0 , which obviously factors as ( t − 2 cos n 2 π ) ( t − 2 cos n 4 π ) ⋯ ( t − 2 cos n π ( n − 1 ) )
Now, by Newton's sums we see that P 1 = t , P 2 = t 2 − 2 and P k = t P k − 1 − P k − 2 . We only want to know the coefficient of t and the constant term, so we see that the last term of P k is:
So, adding them:
⋯ + ⌊ 4 n + 1 ⌋ terms ( 1 − 3 + 5 − 7 + ⋯ ) t + ⌊ 4 n − 1 ⌋ terms ( − 2 + 2 − 2 + ⋯ ) + 1 = 0
By Vieta's formulas, S is − 2 × constant term coefficient of t :
S = − 2 × ( − 2 + 2 − 2 + ⋯ ) + 1 1 − 3 + 5 − 7 + ⋯
After adjusting it, we end up with S = 2 ⌊ 4 n + 1 ⌋ ( − 1 ) ( n − 1 ) / 2
In this problem n = 2 0 1 5 , so S = − 1 0 0 8 .