Why we rip the way we do

When tearing a sheet of paper most people exert a force perpendicular to the sheet, rather than grabbing the sheet by the edges and trying to pull it apart. The physics of this can be understood with a simple model.

Consider a row of three springs along the x-axis with the same spring constant and length, connected end to end. Initially, they are all at their natural length. If any of them stretch by more than one percent they will break. This is our paper. Tearing apart is equivalent to putting forces N1 and N2 (each with magnitude N) at the two points where two springs join, in opposite directions and perpendicular to the springs. Pulling apart is equivalent to putting equal and opposite forces F1 and F2 (magnitude F) at the same points but now parallel to the springs. Find the ratio F / N F/N when the middle spring breaks.

Details and assumptions

  • Hint 1: Do NOT assume that the ends of the springs move only vertically.
  • Hint 2: tear the paper slowly and think about force balances.


The answer is 5.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

David Mattingly Staff
May 13, 2014

We first simplify by assuming the natural length of the springs is 1 m and that we stretch the springs slowly towards the breaking point. In this case, one can treat the ends of the springs as moving at a constant velocity and hence with zero acceleration. For the case of the horizontal forces, the force balance on the right node is F N e t = 0 = F 1 k Δ m k Δ m / 2 F_{Net}=0=F_1-k\Delta_m-k\Delta_m/2 where Δ m \Delta_m is the amount the middle spring has stretched (NOT the length of the spring). Hence F = 3 k Δ m / 2 F=3k \Delta_m/2 .

Similarly, one can do a force balance for the vertical force case. However, one must consider both x and y directions and do a little geometry first. Center a coordinate system on the middle spring (so the origin is in the center of the middle spring) and denote the horizontal position of the right end of the middle spring by 1 / 2 x 1/2-x . The y displacement will be denoted by y. Since the middle spring will snap if it only stretches by 0.01 m, the displacements are small relative to the length of the springs. The angles the springs make with the horizontal are also small and we can use the small angle approximation ( cos θ 1 , sin θ = θ \cos~\theta \approx 1, \sin~\theta=\theta ). The total stretch of the middle spring (remember that it's stretching on both 'sides') is Δ m = 2 y 2 2 x \Delta_m=2y^2-2x and the total stretch of the right spring is x + y 2 / 2 x+y^2/2 .

The horizontal force balance and the small angle approximation allows us to relate x and y, yielding 2 x = y 2 2x=y^2 . The vertical force balance allows us to find N as N = 3 k Δ m 3 / 2 N=3k \Delta_m^{3/2} . F / N F/N is therefore F / N = ( 2 Δ m 1 / 2 ) 1 F/N=(2 \Delta_m^{1/2})^{-1} . At snapping Δ m = 0.01 \Delta_m=0.01 , which yields F / N = 5 F/N=5 .

The length of the 3 springs were equal, i suppose. So why did you impose their expansion unequal in the 'F' case?

Masuk Shoumo - 1 year, 10 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...