"World's Hardest Easy Geometry Problem"

Geometry Level 3

Find x x (in degrees).


The answer is 20.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

6 solutions

Discussions for this problem are now closed

Louis W
Nov 30, 2014

Just make use of elementary geometry you say? As you wish...

All the angles in a triangle add up to 180º, so I can fill in some blanks on the picture.

m A C B = 20 º m\angle ACB = 20º

m A D B = 40 º m\angle ADB = 40º

m A E B = 30 º m\angle AEB = 30º

There's more to find, but it leads to a dead end...

So I just need more lines on this picture (crazy, right?). As of this point in geometry, I would know about parallel lines and transversals. So to start, I need to draw the line parallel to A B \overline{AB} through D D , intersecting B C \overline{BC} at F F (so A B D F \overline{AB} \parallel \overline{DF} ). Then I can draw A F \overline{AF} , intersecting B D \overline{BD} at G G . Finally, I can draw C G \overline{CG} .

Now, there are quite a few congruent triangles on this picture, but none that can be proven with the information I have thus far. But I can fill in more blanks.

Corresponding Angles are Congruent, so:

m C A B = m C D F = 80 º m B D F = 60 º m\angle CAB = m\angle CDF = 80º\ \color{#3D99F6}{\Rightarrow} m\angle BDF = 60º

m C B A = m C F D = 80 º m\angle CBA = m\angle CFD = 80º

There are now several isosceles triangles on this picture, two of which are A B C \triangle ABC and D F C \triangle DFC . So,

D C F C \overline{DC}\cong\overline{FC}

A C B C \overline{AC}\cong\overline{BC}

Subtract these two: A C D C = B C F C A D B F AC - DC = BC - FC \color{#3D99F6}{\Rightarrow} \overline{AD}\cong\overline{BF}

I now have everything necessary to say that by the SAS postulate, A B D B A F \triangle ABD \cong \triangle BAF . Thus,

m D B A = m F A B = 60 º m F A E = 10 º m\angle DBA = m\angle FAB = 60º\ \color{#3D99F6}{\Rightarrow} m\angle FAE = 10º

m A D B = m B F A = 40 º m A F D = 60 º m\angle ADB = m\angle BFA = 40º\ \color{#3D99F6}{\Rightarrow} m\angle AFD = 60º

That is the second angle of D F G \triangle DFG , thus m D G F = 60 º m\angle DGF = 60º , which makes D F G \triangle DFG equiangular, and thus equilateral. Thus,

D F D G G F \overline{DF}\cong\overline{DG}\cong\overline{GF}

I now have everything necessary to say that by the SSS postualte, C G D C G F \triangle CGD \cong \triangle CGF . Thus,

m A C G = m B C G = 10 º m\angle ACG = m\angle BCG = 10º

And now a tricky one to see, I now have everything necessary to say that by the ASA postulate, A C G C A E \triangle ACG \cong \triangle CAE . Thus,

A G E C \overline{AG}\cong\overline{EC}

A F C \triangle AFC is isosceles, so A F F C \overline{AF}\cong\overline{FC}

Subtract those two: A F A G = F C E C G F E F D F E F AF - AG = FC - EC \color{#3D99F6}{\Rightarrow} \overline{GF}\cong\overline{EF} \color{#3D99F6}{\Rightarrow} \overline{DF}\cong\overline{EF}

That makes D F E \triangle DFE isosceles. Therefore,

2 ( x + 30 ) º + 80 º = 180 º 2(x+30)º + 80º = 180º

x = 20 º \color{#3D99F6}{\Rightarrow} \color{#D61F06}{x = 20º}\space\space\space\Box

Nice done, I liked it. I wonder if there exist a shorter way.

Tagesse Lonsamo - 5 years, 7 months ago

I cant figure out this: "by the ASA postulate, ∆ACG = ∆CAE" is trure. Can you more explain.

mongol genius - 4 years, 11 months ago

I guess you did have to put that one together a little. It's given that m E A C = 10 ° m \angle EAC = 10° , and I found before that m F A E = 10 ° m \angle FAE = 10° . Add those together and m G A C = 20 ° m \angle GAC = 20° , same as A C E \angle ACE . Also, I found before that m A C G = 10 ° m \angle ACG = 10° , just like E A C \angle EAC . Finally, A C \overline{AC} is congruent to itself. It may be difficult to see in the picture, but these two sets of congruent angles are oriented on A C \overline{AC} such that these two triangles are congruent by the ASA postulate.

Louis W - 4 years, 11 months ago

Great job. Very nicely done........

Sandeep Sharma - 6 years, 6 months ago

the answer is 30

Ralston Rhoden - 5 years, 5 months ago

how /FAB = 60

Chandu Shaker - 5 years, 5 months ago

A B D B A F \triangle ABD \cong \triangle BAF , and corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent.

Louis W - 4 years, 11 months ago

Another reason is that since AB || DF then the Alternate angle theorem can be applied to show that FAB = DFG. since Triangle DFG is equilateral.

Jonathan Harrison - 4 years, 11 months ago

Can somebody tell where I went wrong- Ang(DAE)=ang(DBE)/2=10°.So B is the centre of the circle joining D,E, and A.Now,ang(AED)=ang(ABD)/2=60°/2=30°.

Ayush Pattnayak - 5 years, 1 month ago

I have no idea what you are trying to do, make a circle out of angle bisector concurrence?

But, if B is the center of the circle joining D, E and A, then BD, BE and BA are all radii and should equal one another. And they aren't, or triangles ABD and BDE would both be isosceles and this problem would be much easier.

Louis W - 4 years, 11 months ago

@Louis W - So what?BD, BE and BA might be equal.Start from my logic,where was I wrong?After all,B can be the centre of the concerned circle!

Ayush Pattnayak - 4 years, 11 months ago

That's the thing, I don't know what your logic was in the first place. And no, none of those are congruent. If they were, A B D \triangle ABD would be isosceles and m A D B m \angle ADB would be 80 ° 80° , but it is 40 ° 40° . Similar for B D F \triangle BDF . So whatever your logic is, something is wrong with it because the outcome doesn't work.

Louis W - 4 years, 11 months ago

I can see that DFE = 80 and I can agree that if the argument for Isocelles is right then angle DEF = (x + 30) but how did you get the extra (x + 30)? I cannot see how you get the measure for Angle FDE as (x + 30).

Jonathan Harrison - 4 years, 11 months ago

D F E \triangle DFE being isosceles has nothing to do with m D E F = ( x + 30 ) ° m \angle DEF=(x+30)° . That is just the sum of the two smaller angles that comprise it (look at the very beginning, m A E B = 30 ° m \angle AEB=30° ). m F D E = ( x + 30 ) ° m \angle FDE=(x+30)° because D F E \triangle DFE is isosceles, one of the two angles opposite the congruent sides is ( x + 30 ) ° (x+30)° and those two angles are also congruent.

Louis W - 4 years, 11 months ago

I get it 'till triangle EDF is isosceles. But then, I'll tend to state that angle EDF + 2(x+30) = 180° However, once we are here, angle DEF = angle EFD = angle CBA = 80° x = DEF-30° would give me 50° What am I doing wrong? Wherer do the 80° come from in the last equation?

Marçau Champaud - 4 years, 10 months ago

The two angles congruent in an isosceles triangle are the two angles opposite the two congruent sides. D F \overline{DF} and E F \overline{EF} are the congruent sides, so E D F \angle EDF and D E F \angle DEF are the congruent angles, one of which is ( x + 30 ) ° (x+30)° . The third angle E F D \angle EFD (aka C F D \angle CFD ) is 80 ° 80° , and is found shortly after I modified the picture.

The way that you set it up would imply that D E \overline{DE} and D F \overline{DF} are congruent, which is not what happened.

Louis W - 4 years, 10 months ago

Nice! I had to get out the colored pencils when you said it got tricky.

Michael Rocheleau - 4 years, 9 months ago

hi Louis W, correct working. though at some points you made it unnecessarily lengthy! but till now only your working is correct. I appreciate your hard work. very good job.

MrRafin Ahmed - 6 years, 6 months ago

nice job if / FBD= 30 / DBA =50 EAB= 60 EAD= 20 what will the answer pls

محمد مصباح - 5 years, 11 months ago

The answer would be x = 30 ° x=30° . Instead of drawing the line through D, you would draw it through E, and then draw a few more lines. It makes a different picture, but uses similar concepts.

Louis W - 4 years, 11 months ago

I didnt think i understand u wrote because its too long for me....

Sulung Agus - 4 years, 11 months ago
Long Tran
Dec 18, 2015

How did you go from the sin(10)/[2cos(80)sin(70)] to x=20? I'm trying to follow, but the math wasn't working out for me in the end.

Scott Mann - 4 years, 10 months ago
Don Spaulding
Sep 6, 2016

Use the law of cosines to solve for cos(x) in terms of the base and sides of the large isosceles triangle. Two equations in two unknowns

My triangle is this one, I know the "correct" answer is 20, but this is what I did and my answer is x = 50°. Please let me know if you find a mistake so I can correct it, thank you

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=994470413942408&set=a.610002989055821.1073741834.100001383774807&type=3&theater

The angles at the point on side AB of the triangle. What makes you the angles are 60 and 80? And please label intersection points properly. Don't reuse name for different points.

Tan Wei Xin - 5 years, 5 months ago
Ilan Amity
Dec 18, 2015

A similar difficult problem will be with the same drawing (not to scale) but with different angles: the pair 70 - 10 becomes 60 - 20 and the pair 60 - 20 becomes 50 - 30

Draw AB।।DG and DG।।EF. So, <FEG=100. (as, <CEF=80). DE divide <FEG equally. So,<FED=<DEG=50. <DEG=x+30=50. So, x=50-30=20.

But how did you get <FEG is equally divided by DE?

Mark Guo - 6 years, 6 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...