{ 0 . 2 7 2 7 2 7 … , λ , 0 . 7 2 7 2 7 2 … } are in harmonic progression, then λ must be an irrational number.
If the numbers
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
As we know that both the terms leaving lamda are rational so lambda has to be rational
Let a = 0 . 2 7 2 7 2 7 . . . . and b = 0 . 7 2 7 2 7 2 . . . .
1 0 0 a = 2 7 . 2 7 2 7 2 7 . . . . & 1 0 0 b = 7 2 . 7 2 7 2 7 2 . . . .
\Rightarrow 99a = 27 \text { & } 99b = 72
a = 1 1 3 , b = 1 1 8
Now
1 1 3 < λ < 1 1 8
λ = 1 1 5
which is rational, hence λ need not be irrational.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Given any three successive terms in an harmonic progression, {...,x, y, z,...}, the following is true
y = x + z 2 x z
If x = 1 1 3 and z = 1 1 8 , then
y = 1 1 3 + 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 1 1 8 = 1 2 1 4 8
which is a rational number, as would be expected for any rational x , z .
Harmonic Progression