Zebedees's Number

Logic Level 2

Zebedee secretly writes down two consecutive positive integers . Then he tells one of the numbers to Xanthe, and the other number to Yvette (without telling them each other's number, but only telling their numbers are consecutive). The following conversation ensues:

Xanthe: "I don't know your number."
Yvette: "I don't know your number."
Xanthe: "Now I know your number!"
Yvette: "Now I know your number!"

Which of the following must be one of the two numbers?


Note: A randomly chosen correct and complete solution writer will receive a copy of Alex's new puzzle book, Can You Solve My Problems? .

1 2 3 4 5 Not possible to tell

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

24 solutions

Tarmo Taipale
Mar 30, 2017

First, I want to note that you can't assume the numbers are between 1 and 5. You only know they are consecutive positive integers.

To start with, Xanthe would know Yvette's numbers at the start if her number was 1, as Yvette's number would have to be 2 (0 isn't positive). So Xanthe's number isn't 1, and the Yvette states, knowing Xanthe's number isn't 1, that she doesn't know Xanthe's number.

If Yvette's number was 1, she would know Xanthe has 2 and if Yvette's number was 2, she would know Xanthe has 3 (as Xanthe can't have 1). Which means Yvette has an other number than 1 or 2.

As Xanthe knows Yvette has an other number than 1 or 2, she must have the number 2 or 3 herself (by having 2 she would know Yvette has 3 as Yvette can't have 1, and by having 3 she would know Yvette has 4 as Yvette can't have 2).

Having 3, Yvette knows Xanthe has 2, as Xanthe couldn't have known Yvette's number if Xanthe's number was 4 (where Yvette could have 3 or 5. Having 4, Yvette knows Xanthe has 3, as Xanthe couldn't have known Yvette's number if Xanthe had 5 instead (where Ivette could have 4 or 6).

Which means, we have two possible cases:

  • Xanthe has the number 2 and Yvette has the number 3 OR
  • Xanthe has the number 3 and Yvette has the number 4

The conclusion is that either of the numbers must be 3 \boxed{3} .

nice solution.

so if x had 3 and y had 2 the conversation would be:

x : i don't know ur number

y : i know ur number

x : i know ur number

but what would it be if x had 4 and y had 3 and x has to start the conversation? i am a little confused

Mehdi K. - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Well, if X has 4 and Y has 3, the following would happen:

X doesn't know whether Y has 3 or 5, so she says she doesn't know. If X had 1, she would have concluded that Y has 2. So Y knows X can't have 1. As she has 3, she doesn't know whether X has 2 or 4, saying she doesn't know. If Y had 1, she would have concluded X has 2, and if Y had 2 she would have concluded X has 3. So Y doesn't have 1 or 2. X still doesn't know whether Y has 3 or 5 and says she doesn't know. Y knows X can't have 1,2 or 3. (Y would have 3 if X had 2, and if X had 3, Y would have 4). And now Y knows X must have 4 by having 3 herself. If Y had 5, she couldn't have known X has 4, so X now knows Y has 3.

So the conversation would be like this: X: "I don't know your number." Y: "I don't know your number." X "I don't know your number." Y: "I know your number!" X: "I know your number!"

Tarmo Taipale - 4 years, 1 month ago

x is 2, y is 3

Wong Kwym - 4 years, 1 month ago

The problem didn't state that z gave the numbers in ascending order to x and y respectively, it is only assumed.

Matt Kister - 4 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

No, it is not assumed. Y might have the bigger number as well, but this isn't the case, judging by what X and Y say and in which order. The conversation X and Y had, implies that it's possible that X has 3 and Y has 4, but it's impossible that X has 4 and Y has 3, for instance.

Tarmo Taipale - 4 years, 1 month ago

In France, "positive" means "superior or equal to zero" since the high school. When strictly superior, then "strictly positive". The states was not enough to be understood and solved in foreign language.

Leonblum Iznotded - 2 years, 11 months ago
Brandon Monsen
Mar 30, 2017

Relevant wiki: K-level thinking

Xanthe's first statement implies that her number isn't 1 1 , since that would force Yvette's number to be 2 2 .

With this knowledge, Yvette still doesn't know Xanthe's number. If her number was 2 2 , she would be able to conclude that Xanthe's number was three, since one of the surrounding numbers ( 1 1 ) was already ruled out from the first statement. If she had a 1 1 , then she would know that Xanthe must have a 2 2 as well. Hence, Yvette doesn't have a 1 1 or a 2 2 .

Now, Xanthe does have enough information to determine Yvette's number, and we know that Yvette doesn't have a 1 1 or a 2 2 . This means that 1 1 or 2 2 must be consecutive to Xanthe's number if she were able to determine which number Yvette has.

Since we've already established that Xanthe doesn't have a 1 1 , we get that Xanthe's number must be a 2 2 or a 3 3 , which would force Yvette to have a 3 3 or a 4 4 .

In both cases, 3 \boxed{3} is one of the two numbers.

Yatin Khanna
Mar 30, 2017

Statement 1: (Xanthe) "I don't know your number."
Conclusion: Xanthe doesn't have the number 1; or else; she would directly know that Yvette has 2.

Statement 2: (Yvette) "I don't know your number."
Conclusion: Yvette doesn't have 1; or else she would have known Xanthe's number; neither does Yvette have 2; because then she could have known that Xanthe has 3; as the possibility of Xanthe having 1 was already eliminated by statement 1.

Statement 3: (Xanthe) "Now I know your number."
Conclusion: Since, Xanthe has had no other information apart from the conclusion of statement 2(i..e. Yvette doesnt have 1 or 2); this means that this information is enough for Xanthe to know Yvette's number. This means that eliminating 1 and 2 in mind leaves her with only 1 possible case; which means that Xanthe has 2 and Yvette has 3 (eliminating 1 helps Xanthe know this) or Yvette has 4 and Xanthe has 3 (eliminating 2 helps Xanthe know).

Statement 4: (Yvette) "Now I know your number."
Conclusion: Yvette must have understood what went in Xanthe's mind after her (Yvette's) previous statement (see conclusion of previous statement) and now; Yvette can easily know Xanthe's number to be 2 or 3 based on the number with her.

Note that no other case would work because then; Yvette's first statement isn't good enough for Xanthe to definitely know the other number.
Hence the two possible cases are ( 2 , 3 ) ; ( 3 , 4 ) (2, 3); (3, 4) and the only number which appears in both is 3 \boxed {3}

Very systematic approach. For a bonus challenge: What would the 2 integers be if Yvette said "I still don't know the numbers." ? Will your approach still work?

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

In these kind of questions we assume everyone to be perfectly logical. So, I dont think the situation you are presenting is possible I.e. given X knows the number of Y; Y can definitely guess the number of X.

This made me realise that the 4th statement is quite irrelevant to the problem.

Yatin Khanna - 4 years, 1 month ago
Shoaib Shafi
Mar 30, 2017

Solution: Statement 1: Xanthe doesn't know Yvette's number => Xanthe doesn't have number 1, If she would have number 1 then she would know for sure that Yvette has number 2.

Statement 2: Yvette doesn't know Xanthe's number => Yvette doesn't have number 1, If she would have number 1 then she would know for sure that Xanthe has number 2, and she also doesn't have number 2 because if she had number 2 than she would know that Xanthe has number number 3 because Xanthe doesn't have number 1 and other consecutive to 2 is 3.

Statement 3: Now Xanthe knows Yvette's number => From Statement#2, Xanthe learnt that Yvette can't have 1 or 2. So there are two cases for Xanthe to know Yvette's number. If Xanthe has 2 then she knows that Yvette must have 3 because Yvette can't have 1. If Xanthe has 3 then she knows that Yvette must have 4 because Yvette can't have 2.

Statement 4: Now Yvette knows Xanthe's number => If Yvette has number 3, then she knows that Xanthe has 2 because if Xanthe had 4, Xanthe would never know Yvette's number. If Yvette has number 4, then she knows that Xanthe has 3 becuase if Xanthe had 5 ,Xanthe would never know Yvette's number.

Now, only number which is present in both cases is 3. Hence, 3 is one of the Zebedee's numbers.

Gsm Offln
Apr 13, 2017
  1. The first girl (X) is only sure if she has a number at either end of a known sequence (1 in the case of positive integers), then Y should have 2.
  2. If not, Y is only sure if she herself has 1 or 2 (then X has either 2 or 3, correspondingly).
  3. If not, X is only sure if she herself has 2 or 3.
  4. If not, Y is only sure if she herself has 3 or 4. ... and so on ... N. If not, X/Y is only sure if she herself has either N-1 or N. N+1. Y/X is sure, too, as she has either N or N+1 (the phase in the picture is superfluous).

We can easily see that after every round we eliminate one number from the end of the range until one of the girls reaches either her number or the next one. Since X told she knows in the 3rd round, she has either 3 or 2. Thus Y has either 4 or 3. One of the girls surely has 3.

Great generalization. Food for thought: If precisely one of the 4 speeches is a lie, how can we solve this problem? I'm thinking it got something to do with Hamming codes but I don't know how to push through. Thoughts?

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 1 month ago
Sophie Liu
Apr 10, 2017

If Xante had any number x larger than 2, he would never know what Yvette's number is, since Yvette's number can be x+1 or x-1. No matter what Yvette says, Xante can not know Yvette's number.

When Yvette is 1, after being told that Yvette doesn't know his number, Xanthe knows Yvette's number. If Yvette was 1, he would know Xanthe's number, which would be 2, and Xanthe would know Yvette's number, since it would have to be 1 for Yvette to immediately know what Xanthe has. However, neither know the other's number in the first phase of the conversation, but they know in the second, so Yvette cannot be 1.

When Xanthe is 2, Yvette can either be 1 or 3, but since Yvette is not 1, he must be three, which is what Xanthe must have been thinking (Yvette should know my number if her's is 1, so since she doesn't know, it must be 3). It works out for Yvette, as well (Xanthe knows my number now, so she can't be 4, or she wouldn't know anything, so since Xanthe knows, she must be 2!).

Gregory Lewis
Mar 31, 2017

X doesn't know => X > 1 (1 is the only positive integer with only 1 neighbor)

Y doesn't know => Y > 2 (as above, but 2 also has only one eligible neighbor, since X != 1)

X now knows => X = 2, Y = 3 or X = 3, Y = 4 (2 and 3 are the only integers with exactly 1 neighboring number > 2)

Therefore, 3 must be one of the numbers.

Chiew Shia See
Mar 31, 2017

If Pearson A got number 1 or 5, she must obviously know Pearson B's number since they knew that number given is consecutive, but Pearson A does not know. Hence, Pearson A got 2,3 or 4. Now, Pearson B said she don't know Pearson A's number, hence Pearson A knew that Pearson B got 2,3 or 4. Pearson A had changed her opinion, therefore: Situation 1. if Pearson A got 2, she knew that Pearson B got 3. Situation 2. if Pearson A got 4, she knew that Pearson B got 3. [Pearson A obviously did not get number 3 because once Pearson B said she did not know, Pearson A changes her opinion.(If Pearson A get number 3, she will not change her opinion since she only know Pearson B get number 2 and 4.)]

Conclude, Pearson B get number 3.(Pearson B)

Praveen Kumar P
Mar 31, 2017

From the given options, possible answers for X and Y are:

X: 1 2 3 4 5
Y: 1 2 3 4 5

From statement 1: For X to know Y, X must be 1 or 5. Since X don't know Y's number, then X cannot be 1 or 5. so possible X and Y are:

X: 2 3 4
Y: 1 2 3 4 5

From statement 2: For Y to know X, Y must be 1 or 5. Since Y don't know X's number, then Y cannot be 1 or 5. so possible X and Y are:

X: 2 3 4
Y: 2 3 4

the possible combinations of (X,Y) are: (2,3),(3,2),(3,4),(4,3) which shows that 3 \boxed{3} is always one of the numbers...
Two statements are sufficient.

For simplicity, it is obvious that the consecutive numbers over 4-5, both girls can never make sure what the other one has, and they can't have 1 either, as 0 is not allowed. The possible pair varies in 2-4, which clearly involves 3 in either of them.

To clarify further, if X has 2, she only knows Y has 1 or 3. Then when Y declares she does not know, Y obviously can't have 1. Therefore, the possible (x,y) is (2,3).

If X has 3, Y can either have 2 or 4. If Y has 2 and knows that X doesn't know her number, she can easily figure out that X can't have 1, thus knowing X will have 4. However, since Y doesn't know, X can figure out that Y doesn't have 2, thus the next possible (x,y) is (3,4).

If X has 4, Y can have either 3 or 5, but even if Y has 3, she will naturally not know X's number, for either 2,4 is still in the middle of the integers.

Thus, there are only two such possibilities, both of which confirms that either of them will have 3.

Shantanu Agarwal
Mar 30, 2017

First of all we have to assume that there are only 5 numbers 1 to 5 otherwise you cant tell the answer. Now we know that both of them knows that the numbers are consecutive. When first girl says "I don't know your number". This means she don't have 1 or 5 else if she had 1 or 5 she would have knew the other number also because the two numbers are consecutive. But she still don't know the other girls number. When second girl says she too don't know the first one's number. This means she too didn't get a 1 or 5. Now both knows that the other girl didn't get a 1 or 5. Now girl 1 and 2 could have 2,3,or 4. If one has 2 or 4 then other girl has 3. Thus first one got one of the 2 or 4(as she was sure).
Thus 3 is a necessary number. But the question is vaguely posted. There is no bound on total numbers. Also 2nd girl won't be able to know the 1st girls number.

But 1-5 are the choices for the known number, not the possibilities for the numbers.

Whitney Clark - 4 years, 2 months ago

If one of them got number 1 then other can conclude the other number is 2. The only positive intger close to 1 is 2.

Both Xanthe and Yuvanthe(X and Y) got correct answer once both came to know other don't know number each other. When X=2: Y can have 2 values. 1 or 3 ( X-1 or X+1) When Y says I don't know X , X can rule out possibility of Y=1 means Y=3

When X says I don't know Y whose value is 3, Y thinks X can have 2 values 2 or 4 (Y-1 or Y+1) Since X says that now he/she got the value of Y Y can rule out X=4. If X was 4 it cannot understand value of Y.

So X=2 and Y=3

Scrub Lord
Apr 12, 2017

Let us consider two combinations: 2,3 and 3,4. Why? Because the only case when Yvette knows Xanthe's number (or vice versa) right away is when her number is 1. Therefore, neither Xanthe's nor Yvette's number is 1. If Xanthe's number is 2, the only numbers that are consecutive in pair with 2 are 1 and 3. Because Yvette's number is not 1, the only remaining option is 3. Then consider a scenario in which Xanthe's number is 3, which implies that Yvette's number is either 2 or 4. If her number is 2, she already knows Xanthe's number is 3, since it's not 1. Because she doesn't know Xanthe's number, her number must in fact be 4.

Zarin Tasnim
Mar 31, 2017

Looks harder than it is!

It can't be 1 or 5, because then it can't be consecutive. The remaining options are 2,3,4. If they're consecutive pairs, it has to be 2-3, or 3-4 - meaning 3 is for sure one of the numbers!

First Xanthe said I dont know your number. This remove 1 and 5 from the selection because if Xanthe got 1 she defenitely knew that Yvette got 2 and if she got 5 she knew Yvette got 4. Second Yvette said I dont know you number, meaning she also doesnt have the number 1 and 5. This gives two possible cases - they got 2 and 3 -or they got 3 and 4 In both cases number 3 must be one of Zebedee's numbers. more.... Yvette doesn t really know Xanthe s number because she have the number 3.

Philippe Proost
Mar 30, 2017

First, let's look at the list of positive, consecutive numbers: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,...

Now, the root idea of this problem is:

"The person who gets 1, will know the other number, as its only positive neighbouring number is 2 (0 isn't positive)".

More general, a person will know the other number when they can exclude one of the two options.

Let's look at the possible numbers per person:

X Y
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
.. ..

When X says she doesn't know her number, she can't have 1.

When Y says she doesn't know her number, she can't have 1 or 2 (as she knows X does not have 1).

The resulting possible numbers per person:

X Y
/ /
2 /
3 3
4 4
5 5
.. ..

When now X says she knows her number, she can have 2 or 3. As Y cannot have 1 or 2.

When now Y says she knows her number, she can have 3 or 4. As X can only have 2 or 3.

The only possible pairs are (2,3) and (3,4). Thus the number 3 must be one of Zebedee's numbers.

Pamela Dietz
Mar 30, 2017

Neither woman has 1 or 5 because if they did, they would know the other person's number was 2 or 4 respectively. That means that the two numbers come from the set of 2, 3 and 4. Three has to be one of the numbers - since the numbers are consecutive, the choice of 2 and 4 is eliminated. The choices are 2 and 3 or 3 and 4.

Avianna Gay
Mar 30, 2017

This solution was submitted by my friend Paul Kalmar, so if you happen to select this answer, give him the book... he's a friggin' genius , Thank you...

" It's a strange multiple choice question, as there are exactly two numbers possible and both are listed as choices. 2 and 3. The only number which would tell the other the answer is 1. Saying that they don't know the other number means they do not have 1. This is only informative if the number they have is 2, as the only remaining choice for other number is 3. Knowing that this solved the problem, the one with 3 knows the other has 2. "

-Paul Kalmar


Now here's my logic:

If either girl had the number 1, they would know that other girl had the number 2

But since neither girl had the number 1, Yvette and Xanethe now have all of the information that they need:

Yvette now knows for sure that Xanethe's number must be 3, seeing that neither of them have 1 and that would be only other consecutive number to the number 2, however, if she declares that she "knows" Xanethe's number, that still would leave Xanethe with two choices for Yvette (2 or 4) , so Xanethe still needs more information:

By telling Yvette "Now I know you're number " gives Yvette the chance to either:

A) Declare that she knows Xanethe's number. Which means that Yvette does not have two numbers to guess from...she only has one number to guess from. And since the number 1 has been ruled out, number 2 is the only number left that now has one consecutive number to choose from (number 3.), Yvette must have the number 2.

....OR.....

B) Yvette will declare that she still does not know Xanethe's number, which means that she has two possible numbers to guess from (3 or 5), meaning that Yvette would have the number 4.

Xanethe delcaring that she now "knows" Yvette's number, gives Yvette the chance to confirm to Xanethe, if Yvette has the number 2 or the number 4

However, in either scenario, Xanethe's number must be 3...

Vaidehi Pethe
Mar 30, 2017

One of the Zebedee's +ve integer is 3

Solution :

If Xanthe had 1, Yvette would have 2

But Xanthe would already know the two consecutive +ve integers

If Yvette had 1, Xanthe would have 2

But Yvette would already know the two consecutive +ve integers

Therefore 1 is not the possible integer

If Xanthe had 5, Yvette - 4 (6 isn't an option)

But Xanthe would already know the two consecutive +ve integers

If Yvette -5, Xanthe - 4

Yvette would already know the two consecutive +ve integers

Therefore 5 isn't a possible integer

Thus options left are numbers 2, 3, 4

If Xanthe had 2 then Yvette - 3

& if Yvette had 2, Xanthe - 3

If Xanthe had 3, Yvette - 4

& If Yvette - 3 then Xanthe - 4

Both conditions are having 3 in common,

thus we can assume that one of the Zebedee's +ve integer is 3

//saw this question on Facebook, and posted the answer there, then joined brilliant, it's brilliant, reposting it here//

Terry Townsend
Mar 30, 2017

Yes, it's 3, but you cannot use the 5 logic because the problem only states that the girls are given positive consecutive numbers. They are not told that the numbers must be less than or equal to 5. We know that for our multiple choice options, but that information was not given to the girls and it was not needed.

Then how do you get 3?

Konstantin Zeis - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

By presuming the forgotten condition :)

Predrag Popovic - 4 years, 2 months ago

(Sorry for bad english) the condition is not forgotten but implicit in the dialogue (otherwise it wouldn't be possible)

Nicola D'Amico - 4 years, 1 month ago

Are you claiming there are no consecutive positive integers above the number 5; please state your resource ?!

Mark W Allen - 4 years, 1 month ago

No, the top solution clearly demonstrates that we don't even need to know if the numbers can be larger than 5 or not.

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 1 month ago
Susan Harris
Mar 30, 2017

Neither girl can have a 1 or a 5 since, in that case, they would know the other had a 2 or a 4. Of the remaining three numbers the only consecutive pairs are 2,3 or 3,4 each of which contain a 3. QED

two consecutive positive integers is the only information given with no limits so the answer could just as well be the numbers 11 and 12, both consecutive positive integers. There is no range limit in the problem statement thus NOT possible to tell QED.

Marcel Jussaume - 4 years, 2 months ago

Why can't they have 5? Is there a reason the numbers can't be 6? They were only stated to be positive, not necessarily from 1-5.

Whitney Clark - 4 years, 2 months ago

the question does not state that the choices MUST be between 1 & 5. Therefore ANY integer is a possible solution. Hence, 'not possible to tell' SHOULD be the correct answer to the published question. If the answer is to be 3, then the question MUST state that there is a limited range of possibilities: in this case, [1,5]

Stefn Dreaves - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

You cannot tell the answer, but you can tell ONE of the answers to be 3. See Yatin's answer for more info.

Whitney Clark - 4 years, 1 month ago

Hmmm, you have only demonstrated that if the answer is narrowed down to be one of "1,2,3,4,5", then the answer is 3. But how do you know that the answer is narrowed down to one of these 5 integers? Why can't it be "Not possible to tell"? Or why can't it be "This problem don't show any correct option"?

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

One of the numbers is provably 3. We can't tell which one, though. Yatin Khanna explains why, above.

Whitney Clark - 4 years, 1 month ago

Solution:

Statement 1: Xanthe doesn't know Yvette's number => Xanthe doesn't have number 1, If she would have number 1 then she would know for sure that Yvette has number 2.

Statement 2: Yvette doesn't know Xanthe's number => Yvette doesn't have number 1, If she would have number 1 then she would know for sure that Xanthe has number 2, and she also doesn't have number 2 because if she had number 2 than she would know that Xanthe has number number 3 because Xanthe doesn't have number 1 and other consecutive to 2 is 3.

Statement 3: Now Xanthe knows Yvette's number => From Statement#2, Xanthe learnt that Yvette can't have 1 or 2. So there are two cases for Xanthe to know Yvette's number.

If Xanthe has 2 then she knows that Yvette must have 3 because Yvette can't have 1.

If Xanthe has 3 then she knows that Yvette must have 4 because Yvette can't have 2.

Statement 4: Now Yvette knows Xanthe's number =>

If Yvette has number 3, then she knows that Xanthe has 2 because if Xanthe had 4, Xanthe would never know Yvette's number.

If Yvette has number 4, then she knows that Xanthe has 3 becuase if Xanthe had 5 ,Xanthe would never know Yvette's number.

Now, only number which is present in both cases is 3. Hence, 3 is one of the Zebedee's numbers.

Shoaib Shafi - 4 years, 2 months ago
Abdeslem Smahi
Mar 30, 2017

The first person saying "I don't know yours", tells the second one that the first person cannot have 1 or 5, so must be 2, 3, 4. The second person replying that "I don't know yours" means that the second person cannot have 2 or 4, nor 1 or 5, so she must have 3.

You are forgetting that 1-5 are the choices for the answer, not the possibilities for the numbers.

Hey, it fooled me, too! :-)

Whitney Clark - 4 years, 2 months ago
Shivank Garg
Mar 30, 2017

If one of the number is '1' then other girl would have surely said that she know what is second number because only possible option will be `2'. Similar case for '5'. So only possible option remains "2 and 3" or "3 and 4". Therefore 3 is one of the number.

The problem does not state that 5 is an upper bound, but clearly says that the numbers are positive, so here is my interpretation: Xanthe might be given numbers 1 or 2 or 3 or .... or even infinity, but the only possibilty that Xanthe can be sure of the number of Yvette is as follow: - Assume Xanthe is given number 1, then she would know that Yvette has number 2 (because 0 is impossible, since number must be positive), conclusion: Xanthe is given a number greater than 1. If Xanthe is given 2, then Xanthe wouldn't know weither Yvette has 1 or 3, she would say "I don't know your number", if Yvette is given number 1, she would guess that Xanthe has number 2, and would have replied "I know your number" which is not the case so Xanthe is not given number 1 but 3. - If Xanthe is given 2, then Xanthe wouldn't know weither Yvette has 1 or 3, she would say "I don't know your number", but then since Yvette has number 3, she can't really know weither Xanthe has number 4 or 2, she would reply " I don't know your number" - Now Xanthe is very smart, if Yvette had 1, she would have guessed her number which is not the case, she deduce that Yvette must have a 3, she will reply "I know your number" - Now the tricky part is that Yvette will do the same reasoning we did, and will deduce that since Xanthe guessed right her number, she must have a 2, because there is no way (or strategy) that Xanthe would use to guess Yvette's number if she had a number greater than 2, she will know that she has a 2 and she will reply "I know your number". PS: 2 and 3 are the numbers that Zebedee gave and 2 is also a correct answer, not because there is an upper bound which is 5, but because there is a lower bound which is 1 stated in the problem, problem statement doesnt make any assumption on how big is that number!

Reda Naja - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

yaa........... that was my logic too.

No upperbound, stated in the qs. Must Must not guess from the given set of oprions since there is a "Not possible to Tell" option as well.

I made a simple table for (1,2 ) ; (2,1) ; (2,3) ; (3,2). Not more. Because then it would not be possible for any to be sure in just 2 turns.

the point is, Xanthe gets to be sure of Yvette's number first.

so Xanthe has to get a 2.

And only if Yvette has 3, she would be able to guess Xanthe's number at 2nd turn for her. which is the case. So, 2 & 3 both are right answers. Got the option 2 first from top to bottom flow of "standard" sight. Why not 2? no strong logic. So, 2 is my chosen answer.

Ananya Aaniya - 4 years, 2 months ago

I agree with Reda Naja.. that was my logic too.

No upperbound, stated in the qs. Must Must not guess from the given set of options since there is a "Not possible to Tell" option as well.

I made a simple table for (1,2 ) ; (2,1) ; (2,3) ; (3,2). Not more. Because then it would not be possible for any to be sure in just 2 turns. [Can not see a hassle free way to post the pic of my table or to create one.]

the point is, Xanthe gets to be sure of Yvette's number - first among the girls and not in the 1st round.

so Xanthe has to get a 2.

And only if Yvette has 3, she would be able to guess Xanthe's number at 2nd turn for her. which is the case. So, 2 & 3 both are right answers. Got the option 2 first from top to bottom flow of "standard" sight. Why not 2? no strong logic. So, 2 is my chosen answer. And I Know, my Answer: 2 is Correct.

Thanks..

Ananya Aaniya - 4 years, 2 months ago

The key to solving this problem is the fact that the two numbers are consecutive.

Let's start by using Xanthe's first statement that she doesn't know Yvette's number:

  • If Xanthe had a 1, she would know that Yvette has a 2 because their numbers are consecutive, and she would have said "I know your number!"
  • If Xanthe had a 5, she would also know that Yvette has a 4, again because their numbers are consecutive.

However, because Xanthe doesn't know Yvette's number, we can eliminate these possibilities. Xanthe's number is either 2, 3, or 4.

Yvette knows all of this because Xanthe said she doesn't know Yvette's number. But before declaring that she doesn't know Xanthe's number either, she takes note of the following:

  • If Yvette had a 1, she would know that Xanthe has a 2 because their numbers are consecutive.
  • If Yvette had a 5, she would know that Xanthe has a 4.
  • If Yvette had a 2, she would know that Xanthe has a 3. This is because Xanthe doesn't have a 1, as explained above.
  • If Yvette had a 4, she would also know that Xanthe has a 3, because Xanthe doesn't have a 5.

These statements eliminate all possibilities for Yvette except for 3, and now Xanthe knows that Yvette has a 3. This is the answer to the problem.

There is a fourth statement: Yvette also knows Xanthe's number! However, this is not true. There are two possibilities for Xanthe's number (2 and 4), and no more information can be obtained. Yvette is just guessing :)

So first of all, you cant use the idea that if one if them has 5 she would know since they said consecutive positive integers so the girl with 5 wouldnt know since the number can be 4 or 6. Secondly, none of them can have 1 since 1 would know the number immediately since 0 isnt a positive integer. Thus, if one of them had number 2 and they knew that the other guy doesnt know their number they would immediately know the other girl has 3 since the other girl would know her number if she had 1. Thirdly, if none of them have 2 lets say they have 3 they would say i dont know ur number if the other girl doesnt know her number her number isnt 2 because of what is explained above thus the girl will know that the other had 4. So the number that must be there must be 3. If anybody is wondering why didnt i get the answer is because i thought zero is a positive integer lol. Hope this isnt confusing.

Hazem Salem - 4 years, 2 months ago

You are forgetting that 1-5 are the choices for the answer, not the possibilities for the numbers.

Hey, it fooled me, too! :-)

Whitney Clark - 4 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

yeah but it is a posssible number of the 2 meaning that if one of them had 5 then the other may have a 4 or a 6

Hazem Salem - 4 years, 2 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...