This is note 1 in a set of notes showing how to obtain formulas. There will be no words beyond these short paragraphs as the rest will either consist of images or algebra showing the steps needed to derive the formula mentioned in the title.
Suggestions for other formulas to derive are welcome, however whether they are completed or not depends on my ability to derive them. The suggestions given aren't guaranteed to be the next one in the set but they will be done eventually.
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
I made a YouTube video showing how this would work in arbitrary fields not of characteristic 2. The field not having characteristic 2 is so important because this avoids any of your calculations having zero determinants; in other words, the quantities 2 and 4 will be 0 modulo 2 and our prescribed condition avoids this occurring. In such a setting, steps 6, 7 and 8 will not be valid; solutions can only exist when b2−4ac is a square number in the field. This indicates the severe limitations of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra in its scope only being applied in the framework of the "real number field" and the "complex number field".
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Yup! This is the derivation of the quadratic formula. Great!
I made a YouTube video showing how this would work in arbitrary fields not of characteristic 2. The field not having characteristic 2 is so important because this avoids any of your calculations having zero determinants; in other words, the quantities 2 and 4 will be 0 modulo 2 and our prescribed condition avoids this occurring. In such a setting, steps 6, 7 and 8 will not be valid; solutions can only exist when b2−4ac is a square number in the field. This indicates the severe limitations of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra in its scope only being applied in the framework of the "real number field" and the "complex number field".