This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
it's good to see this....
see this what your proof says in terms of 11=112=1×112−12=1×1−12(1+1)(1−1)=1(1−1)andyoucancelled(1−1)i.e.0frombothsideswhichmeans00thatdoesn′texist
@Kushagra Sahni
–
I get that x^2 =y^2 can have two outcomes but what I am trying to tell u is that x and y have the same signs and this can be seen in the 1st step of the falla ie.Get that.
@Adarsh Kumar
–
16 is just a random example to prove that sqrt. of any real number can be both positive or negative, unless specified otherwise that x>0 or x<0
4-9/2 is obviously a negative number it's equal to -0.5 you should have realized that the square root of a negative number do not exist imaginary only, so you cannot take the square root of the both sides :)
If x=y , then x-y = 0
Hence we cannot cancel (x-y) in the 5th step coz a number divided by 0 is not defined in mathematics.
So even if you prove that 1+1=1(which is not likely to happen).....it won't be practical in real life
Mr. Sharky....you can divide an inequality only by a non zero number....here when you have assumed x=y...then x-y becomes zero....and this is the reason you are getting 2=1
IN STEP 4, YOU CANCELLED X-Y FROM BOTH SIDES AND X-Y WILL BE 0. SO ACTUALLY YOU DIVIDED BY 0 WHICH IS NOT DEFINED. SO, YOU CAN'T PROCEED TO STEP 5. GOOD IF YOU KNOW THIS, IT MEANS THAT YOU ARE GOOD AT MATHS BECAUSE YOU KNOW THE FUNDAMENTALS OF IT. THESE KIND OF QUESTIONS STRENGTHEN
YOUR CONCEPT IN MATHEMATICS. I WOULD BE OBLIGED IF YOU POST MORE QUESTIONS OF THIS KIND. I LOVE MATHS AND WANT TO STRENGTHEN EACH OF MY CONCEPTS:)
x = y i.e. x- y = 0.
But we cancelled x - y from LHS and RHS in the fourth step, which means you cancelled 0!!!
I was in a condition of getting a 'Heart Attack'!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We have seen and it is easily observed that the note posted by Sharky Kea is wrong (I mean to say 1 + 1 is not equal to 1) . The truth is when we solve a equation we actually don't know the value of the variable or variables.But in this case we already have put that x = y so by this we know that x - y = 0 so we can't just cancel
x - y on both sides . In case we don't know the value or if x is equal to y or x is greater than y or something else.....
In that case we can cancel x - y on both the sides as we don't know the value of it , it may be 1 or 4 or even 0 . But because can't assume that it will definitely be 0 so we can cancel x - y on both sides and then the answer will come to be x = 0 and if we substitute it , it holds true. So, 1 + 1 is not equal to 1.
In the third step we subtract y^2 from both the sides. Then we get x^2 - y^2 on left hand side. But x^2 - y^2 = 0 as x = y ,
x^2 = y^2 ,
x^2 - y^2 = 0.
there are more than one problem in your answer
the first one when you divide the both side on (x-y) the rule is ( x - y != 0 ) and x = y so x - y = 0 and you can't divide
the second one is when you reach to the line before the last one x + y = y
so that will be x = y - y that's give x = 0
On 4th step
(x+y)(x-y)=y(x-y), you have cancelled out x-y from both the sides. But according to the assumption made, where x=y => x-y=0. Also 0/0 is undetermined not 1 , so that step is wrong.
At the fifth step, we arrive at the result- x+y=y.Let us think at once, at what values of x and y, can this be true ?only when x=y=0.This is the only solution to x+y=y.If this solution follows , we can never get the result 1+1=1.This is the fallacy.
in 3rd step there is (x^2-y^2) at l.h.s. & in next step it is written as (x+y)(x-y),but it is not applicable for the equal numbers which is the condition given in 1st step....
From (x+y)(x-y) = y(x-y) to x+y = y, you divided each side by (x-y), but since you cannot divide by 0, this only applies if x-y does not equal 0, and since you set both x and y as 1, x-y does equal 0, which makes the equation invalid.
since x=y as stated in the problem, dividing both sides by (x-y) will result in an undefined equation as (x-y) = 0. (x+y)/0 = Undefined so the equality does not hold. <It is equivalent to saying that 1/0=2/0 clearly undefined>
You should watch forth step you ignored x-y ... It
Means u r handling it like a real number...but if you transfer both x-y in one side you will see that u have made 0/0 undefined form......
If x=ythen x−y=0 so in the 4th step you are factoring as (x+y)(0)=y(0) and in the the 5th step you are dividing both sides by 0 and taking the result as 1 which is not allowed
@Sharky Kesa
Hi
This note is similar to my question 'Is it True?'.. check out https://brilliant.org/community-problem/is-it-true/?group=enKxDb2d6cg4&ref_id=201435
Well, technically, the problem is similar to my note. I posted this over 5 months ago, Eddie had reshared about 3 weeks ago and it became a hit. Before, it wasn't.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
x=y This means x−y=0.
In step 4 you have cancelled 0 from both sides!!The world just exploded!!!
Log in to reply
What if it has? What if this is the afterlife?
it's good to see this.... see this what your proof says in terms of 1 1=112=1×112−12=1×1−12(1+1)(1−1)=1(1−1)andyoucancelled(1−1)i.e.0frombothsideswhichmeans00thatdoesn′texist
please give me suggestion if i am wrong
How about this?
-20=-20
4²-9x4=5²-9x5
4²-9x4+81/4=5²-9x5+81/4
(4-9/2)²=(5-9/2)²
4-9/2=5-9/2
4=5
2+2=5
Log in to reply
If x^2=y^2, it doesn't necessarily mean that x=y, it means x=+-y as y can be negative also.
Log in to reply
But in the first step it is given that x=y which implies that both the variables have to have the same sign,unless they both are zero.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
when you take the square root of both sides, you have to add plus or minus sign, and remove extraneous solutions.
since x^1/2 is = +x therefore you can't write 4^2-9*4+81/4 = (4-9/2)^2 it must be written as
(9/2-4)^2=(5-9/2)^2 ie 9/2-4=5-9/2 => 9=9
4-9/2 is obviously a negative number it's equal to -0.5 you should have realized that the square root of a negative number do not exist imaginary only, so you cannot take the square root of the both sides :)
Really, 2+2=5, I checked it using MS Excel: pic.twitter.com/iS9BNigN3p ;)
I think 4th line has defect.
if we taking square root then there are two ans one is positive second one is negetive having magnitude same so we have to assume both cases....
This one's good,
−1=−1
1−1=−11
1−1=−11
1−1=−11
1i=i1
i2=1
−1=1.□
Log in to reply
Quotient rule for radicals yx=yx only applies when x and y are non-negative, and that y=0. So, the third to fourth line of solution is faulty.
Log in to reply
You found it. :D
I completely agree with you
u have to put both + and - while removing the root sign!!
Log in to reply
Wrong
YES, SAME CONCEPT. IF X^2=Y^2, THEN X IS NOT NECESSARILY = TO Y, IT CAN BE -Y ALSO
If x=y , then x-y = 0 Hence we cannot cancel (x-y) in the 5th step coz a number divided by 0 is not defined in mathematics. So even if you prove that 1+1=1(which is not likely to happen).....it won't be practical in real life
u r not allowed to cancel 0 from both sides...i mean (x-y)
Mr. Sharky....you can divide an inequality only by a non zero number....here when you have assumed x=y...then x-y becomes zero....and this is the reason you are getting 2=1
Zero by zero is indeterminate form.. You cannot cancel zero by zero.. (x-y)=0
in 4th line do---x^2+y^2-2xy=xy-y^2
then solve it as, x^2+2y^2-3xy=0
it forms x^2-3xy+2y^2=0
x^2-xy-2xy+2y^2=0
x(x-y)-2y(x-y)=0
(x-2y)(x-y)=0
x=2y or x=y
hence x=y proved;;;;;;
A very good one this is but you know the problem with this.
Log in to reply
Yes I do.
You got x+y=y. Doesn't this imply x=0 and consequently y=0?
Log in to reply
Yes, but I meant for all values of x and y.
Log in to reply
Hmm.....
y can be any value in this case, since only x has to be 0. ((According to x + y = y))
zero cannot be divided
Log in to reply
zero cannot be divided "by"
if x=y then you should not cancell x-y on both sides of equality
IN STEP 4, YOU CANCELLED X-Y FROM BOTH SIDES AND X-Y WILL BE 0. SO ACTUALLY YOU DIVIDED BY 0 WHICH IS NOT DEFINED. SO, YOU CAN'T PROCEED TO STEP 5. GOOD IF YOU KNOW THIS, IT MEANS THAT YOU ARE GOOD AT MATHS BECAUSE YOU KNOW THE FUNDAMENTALS OF IT. THESE KIND OF QUESTIONS STRENGTHEN YOUR CONCEPT IN MATHEMATICS. I WOULD BE OBLIGED IF YOU POST MORE QUESTIONS OF THIS KIND. I LOVE MATHS AND WANT TO STRENGTHEN EACH OF MY CONCEPTS:)
x = y x - y = 0 But in 5th step we cancelled x-y
because of division by zero (x-y)=(1-1)=0
Here (X-y)=0 so we can't devide it from both side so the 4yh step is wrong
I have objection ! you have said that x=y then x-y=0 then why are you cancelling x-y on both sides?
why cant we divide zero by zero?
Log in to reply
That could assume ANY value (i.e. 0, pi, 13, 23523523523,e, you get the point where y,o,u,g,e,t,t,h,e,p,o,i,n, and t are real numbers, etc.)
x squared - y squared = 0
x = y i.e. x- y = 0. But we cancelled x - y from LHS and RHS in the fourth step, which means you cancelled 0!!! I was in a condition of getting a 'Heart Attack'!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
u cant cancel 0 from both the sides in step 4! x-y=0!
you must not cancel x-y on both sides as both have value of 0
Actually it must be: (2-1)^{2} = 2^{2}-2x2x1 +1^{2} =1^{2}-2x1x2+2^{2} =(1-2)^{2} i.e., (2-1)^{2}=(1-2)^{2} =2-1=1-2
=4=2 Hence, 2=1
0 by 0 is not 1 my friend
The error is in line 4 x-y=0 It is incorrect for divided with this.
sir you can't just remove what is spouse to be one of the solutions and say hi everybody the algebra is wrong....
what if i say 1=1
25-24=41-40
(3x3)+(4x4)-(2x3x4)=(5x5)+(4x4)-(2x5x4)
(3-4)^2=(5-4)^2
3-4=5-4 (taking root both sides)
-1=1
if x=y then x-y=0 we cant cancel 0
x-y = 0 You cannot cancel it from the equation
We have seen and it is easily observed that the note posted by Sharky Kea is wrong (I mean to say 1 + 1 is not equal to 1) . The truth is when we solve a equation we actually don't know the value of the variable or variables.But in this case we already have put that x = y so by this we know that x - y = 0 so we can't just cancel x - y on both sides . In case we don't know the value or if x is equal to y or x is greater than y or something else..... In that case we can cancel x - y on both the sides as we don't know the value of it , it may be 1 or 4 or even 0 . But because can't assume that it will definitely be 0 so we can cancel x - y on both sides and then the answer will come to be x = 0 and if we substitute it , it holds true. So, 1 + 1 is not equal to 1.
if x = y , then x-y = 0, therefore you cant use x-y to divide your algebraic expressions
x - y = 0 since 0/0 is not defined... its false
Division by zero is undefined
You divided by 0.
In the third step we subtract y^2 from both the sides. Then we get x^2 - y^2 on left hand side. But x^2 - y^2 = 0 as x = y , x^2 = y^2 , x^2 - y^2 = 0.
so, we have fallacy in the third step itself.
if u remove (x-y) on both side then a condition x is not equal to y should be followed.......so it is wrong.
cancelling out the term (x-y) because that means you cancel zero.
Step 1 & 2 are..
x-y can be cancelled when you x-y is Not equal to zero means x is not equal to y
in step 4 you cancelled (x-y) on both sides but as x=y that means that x-y = o and any expression divided by 0 is not defined.
there are more than one problem in your answer the first one when you divide the both side on (x-y) the rule is ( x - y != 0 ) and x = y so x - y = 0 and you can't divide the second one is when you reach to the line before the last one x + y = y so that will be x = y - y that's give x = 0
Since x=y, x-y=0... if you divide a number by zero it will be undefined, so you cannot divide the equation by x-y.
Not sure that x-y=0 or not!
Log in to reply
No, we are not assuming. If x=y, then obviously x-y=0
Here one can't cancel x-y from both sides
Log in to reply
No, we are not assuming. If x=y, then obviously x-y=0
U r assuming (x-y) = o which is not the case !!
Hi Kesa i'm also confused with this riddle.there is an aliter proof also
In step 4, you divided both sides by (x - y) to arrive at x + y = y.
Meaning, there is a division by zero.
On 4th step (x+y)(x-y)=y(x-y), you have cancelled out x-y from both the sides. But according to the assumption made, where x=y => x-y=0. Also 0/0 is undetermined not 1 , so that step is wrong.
u can't cancel x-y bcz it is 0.
you are a master piece as you can divide 0 by 0
At the fifth step, we arrive at the result- x+y=y.Let us think at once, at what values of x and y, can this be true ?only when x=y=0.This is the only solution to x+y=y.If this solution follows , we can never get the result 1+1=1.This is the fallacy.
x-y=0
x-y=0 => 0/0
you just cancelled two zeroes respectively from the lhs and the rhs in step 4. This cant be done
in 3rd step there is (x^2-y^2) at l.h.s. & in next step it is written as (x+y)(x-y),but it is not applicable for the equal numbers which is the condition given in 1st step....
interesting! I can't find it
Log in to reply
x=y, therefore x-y=0.
The element is zero shock swallow does not participate in the multiplication operation
x+y ≠ y
in the 5th step
x-y/x-y = 0/0 math error
(x+y)(x-y) = y(x-y) only proves that 0=0 x-y cannot be cancelled out as we usually do
(x-y) can not be divided from both sides as x=y makes it divided by zero.
x^2 =y^2 doesnot imply x=y
x = y
x - y = 0
In the fourth step you divided by (x-y), or 0. And when divided by 0, it should be 0 = 0 not 1 + 1 = 1 :)
x-y = 0 & you cancelled 0 on both sides ( 0/0 is not 1 , but undefined).
In the 4th step, (x-y) is on the both sides. dividing (x-y) by (x-y) gives 0/0, which is the indeterminate form. That is the fallacy
since x=y, x-y=0,and in the next step the division isnt possible because division by 0 is not defined in mathematics
Substitute numbers from the beginning and then you get the fault. :P
x-y=0
x=y x-y=0 so (x+y)(x-y)=y(x-y) (x+y)(x-y)/(x-y)=y as (x-y)=0 (x+y)(x-y)/0 which is not exist
you cannot cancel x-y to both sides since x-y = 0. any number divided by 0 is undefined.
when you cancel x-y in LHS with RHS,it directly means that x not equal to y,but then you are putting x=y in next step!
divided by zero
In step 4 you have cancelled 0 from both sides which is not possible
YOu cannot cannot 0 both sides.
u can't divide by x-y since x -y = 0
x - y = 0 and any no. divided by zero is infinity so,we can't cut x-y from both sides.
Take a note from x=y The false statement is when dividing both sides by the difference of x& y where it is indeterminate with denominator of x-y=0.
cannot divided by 0 two sides of equation in step 4 (//because x=y so x-y=0)
x+y=y is the fallacy
Division by zero. Since x = y, x - y = 0. We cannot use the Cancellation Law of Multiplication for a factor of zero.
the eqation (x+y)(x-y)=y(x-y) has two solutions ,first one is (x+y)=y and (x-y)=0.Which gives x=y,the right solution.
x-y, since x-y=0, dividing any number by 0 is undefined (0 by 0 is indeterminate).
because x=y so x-y= 0 => in step 4 you can change both sides to 0
You cannot cancel X-Y until X=Y....
cancellation of (x-y) on both sides is a mistake
If x=y then (x-y) =0 and hence it cannot be divided on any side.
x-y=0, in step 4 x-y can't be eliminated
x=y
From (x+y)(x-y) = y(x-y) to x+y = y, you divided each side by (x-y), but since you cannot divide by 0, this only applies if x-y does not equal 0, and since you set both x and y as 1, x-y does equal 0, which makes the equation invalid.
x=y => x-y=0 => can't divide ( x-y ) in line 4
dividir entre cero
You cancelled x-y with each other. what if values of it is 0? Cancelling of 0/0 is not 1. Btw, result is x=y=0
since x-y=0 you can't cut x-y on both the sides of step no.4
This should have been framed in a form of a question.
since x=y as stated in the problem, dividing both sides by (x-y) will result in an undefined equation as (x-y) = 0. (x+y)/0 = Undefined so the equality does not hold. <It is equivalent to saying that 1/0=2/0 clearly undefined>
as per you second last equation, x is multiple of 2y .. so "x" never is equal to y..
well.. (x-y)=0 so,, no
you have just factored 0 , there are many solutions .. just like 9 x 0 = 0
x-y is 0.Cannot cancel a 0 term
x-y is not 0. you can not cancel a 0 term
x=y means
x−y=0
in step 4 you are dividing the expression by zero which is not possible . this is the fallacy
You should watch forth step you ignored x-y ... It Means u r handling it like a real number...but if you transfer both x-y in one side you will see that u have made 0/0 undefined form......
its wrong when x + y = y, x=y -y or x=0 so you are dead wrong man
x=y implies x-y=0.In step 4 we have divided both sides by 0.So,it's 0/0 which is undefined.
That's not possible
in 4th line, you cannot cancel zero (x-y=0) with zero of other side.
(x-y) = 0. You took 0/0 = 1, which is actually indeterminate.
(x + y )(x - y) = y(x - y) can yield to (x+y) = y only when x not equal to y.
since x=y,x-y=0 in 4th step u have divided by x-y=0 which is not allowed
here, given that x=y and it means x-y=0.... and in 4th step we cannot cancel out (x-y) from both side... so this is totally wrong
Why x=y if x=y then at last what is the necessity that x+y=x
If x=ythen x−y=0 so in the 4th step you are factoring as (x+y)(0)=y(0) and in the the 5th step you are dividing both sides by 0 and taking the result as 1 which is not allowed
This talk is wrong, because it can not be divided by zero to zero, or equal to, this clowning
Log in to reply
Many remarkable things are discovered as a result of clowning :)
Log in to reply
Is clowning the same as trolling, just more mathy?
Log in to reply
@Sharky Kesa Hi This note is similar to my question 'Is it True?'.. check out https://brilliant.org/community-problem/is-it-true/?group=enKxDb2d6cg4&ref_id=201435
Log in to reply
Well, technically, the problem is similar to my note. I posted this over 5 months ago, Eddie had reshared about 3 weeks ago and it became a hit. Before, it wasn't.
We can cancel only non zero common term in both sides of an equation