This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
log1719=19log17=(171719)(log19log19log17)=>1 because xlogx is strictly decreasing for x>e(19log1917log17)17log19
Therefore
19log171719>17log19>1917
Consider the function f(x)=xx1. If you test it's derivatives, you'll find it assumes it's maximum at x=e. So f is larger for that number which is closer to e as f′<0 for x>e. Particularly here, e<17<19, so 17171>19191⇒1719>1917. Sorry bro, calculus is the best option for these problems. You may use a non calculus number theoretic approach but that will be long. Explicitly, you need to do some calculation.
Show that for n≥3, we have nn+11 is a decreasing sequence and that nn−11 is an increasing sequence. The usual approach would be calculus, but you can also use the binomial theorem.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
log1719=19log17=(171719)(log19log19log17)=>1 because xlogx is strictly decreasing for x>e(19log1917log17)17log19 Therefore 19log171719>17log19>1917
Log in to reply
Yeah I thought about that.. But.. Is there no other way we can prove that without using the rule of xlogx is decreasing for x>e ?
Consider the function f(x)=xx1. If you test it's derivatives, you'll find it assumes it's maximum at x=e. So f is larger for that number which is closer to e as f′<0 for x>e. Particularly here, e<17<19, so 17171>19191⇒1719>1917. Sorry bro, calculus is the best option for these problems. You may use a non calculus number theoretic approach but that will be long. Explicitly, you need to do some calculation.
Log in to reply
That's what we learnt in our school. For our exams... Nice example
(This doesn't work out ... Yet)
A non calculus, non logarithm, non tedious expansion / calculation approach.
Step 1: Show using the binomial theorem that for n≥3, we have nn+1>(n+1)n. ( Do you see why you need n greater than 3?).
Step 2: compare 1718>1817 and 1819>1918.
Log in to reply
Ah, yes, a decent solution.. Thanks Bro @Calvin Lin :)
Show that for n≥3, we have nn+11 is a decreasing sequence and that nn−11 is an increasing sequence. The usual approach would be calculus, but you can also use the binomial theorem.
Hence, we have 1719>1818>1917
17^{17+2} or (17+2)^{17} Which is greater...?
No
Absolutly cz 17 is smaller than 19