This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
Isn't 3sin−1x=sin−1x satisfied only when sin−1x=0. If that is true then recalling basic identities of equations:
ac=ad⇒c=d
(Only when a is non zero).
However in our case c=3, d=1 while a=sin−1x which is 0!! Hence
3sin−1x=sin−1x⇒3=1
@Rishabh Jain
–
The problem is that the first four lines are only valid if x=0. If not sin−1x would be 0 for al x, by this argumentation, but the first 4 lines make implicit assumtions that x lies in certain ranges and the intersection of those is {0}
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
You're making two different mistakes.
The first one is that if x2≤21, then (2x2−1)2=(1−2x2)=(2x2−1)
The second one is that if x2>21 then ∣sin−1(x)∣>4π. and 2∣sin−1(x)∣≥2π
Therefore it should be obvious that, 2∣sin−1(x)∣=∣sin−1(2x1−x2)∣, since the LHS >2π and the RHS ≤2π (Range of sin−1 is [2π,−2π])
Isn't 3sin−1x=sin−1x satisfied only when sin−1x=0. If that is true then recalling basic identities of equations: ac=ad⇒c=d (Only when a is non zero).
However in our case c=3, d=1 while a=sin−1x which is 0!! Hence 3sin−1x=sin−1x⇒3=1
Log in to reply
i tried deriving a standard derivation......so universally doesnt it mean that sin inverse x universally is 0!!!!
I think that there is another mistake because if everything is correct till the last step then, 2sin−1x+sin−1x=sin−1x or sin−1x=0.
Log in to reply
Exactly sin−1x=0 that's why in last step we cannot cancel sin−1x from both sides to claim 1=3.
Log in to reply
sin−1x would be 0 for al x, by this argumentation, but the first 4 lines make implicit assumtions that x lies in certain ranges and the intersection of those is {0}
The problem is that the first four lines are only valid if x=0. If not