The version didn’t work out well, so why not increase the length to (to win now requires 4 consecutive cubicles of the same colour), does it have a winning strategy, is it for the first player or for the second player or is it a draw in optimal play?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
@David Vreken @Π @Siddarth @Joe Byrne
Check out this article.
Looks like the first player will win with optimal play.
Log in to reply
Hmm if it took so much time to find optimal play on a computer, on a human scale I would say both sides should be able to win then, no question about 5×5×5 though given that 4×4×4 was itself so hard to solve or any other higher dimensional cases