A tunnel is dug through the earth and a point mass m falls from rest in it. I do know other methods but i want to do it using calculus , i tried it , but the answer i get is not matching . and also briefly tell how to accurately solve 2nd degree differential equations, i have take i account the shrinking of gravity while going down !
Doubt resolved all thanks to Mark Heninngs sir !
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Assuming that the tunnel is radial...
At a distance x from the centre of the earth, the gravitational attraction is proportional to x. Thus we obtain a differential equation dt2d2x=−k2x lumping all the constants together into k. The simplest way to solve this DE is to look for solutions of the form x=eimt. This function will be a solution provided that m2=k2, so we have solutions e±ikt. Since we can choose the initial speed and position of the particle, the general solution is x=Aeikt+Be−ikt Changing the shape of the arbitrary constants, this solution becomes x=Ccoskt+Dsinkt The particle performs SHM.
You can integrate the DE in the way you tried (except that you missed out the minus sign in the DE), obtaining (dtdx)2+k2x2=c If we start with the particle at rest at the earth's surface then, on the way down: dtdx=−kR2−x2 We can separate variables and integrate to obtain x=Rcoskt. The downside of this method, compared with the previous one, is that you need to keep on solving different DEs' depending on the direction of motion of the particle (and the consequent choice of sign for the square root).
Log in to reply
sir i knew that i was missing a negative sign (as x is decreasing) but since i had to square root every term after integrating once , i thought the minus is just creating difficulties so i dropped it for a second :( and this time i will do my method very clearly so that you can check it . also, i know no words how to thank you for the knowledge you impart me ! Thank you very much Sir