I came across this problem today,\[\text{Two standard die are thrown simultaneously,}\\
\text{what is the probability that the sum of the numbers they show is 9?}\]
\[\text{Solution}:
\text{First method}:\text{this is the usual method that is,consider}\\
\text{the ordered pairs.}\\
\text{Total number of ordered pairs satisfying the given}\\
\text{conditions is 4 viz. (3,6),(4,5),(5,4),(6,3).}\\
\text{Total number of ordered pairs=36}.\\
\text{Thus,P(E)}=\dfrac{4}{36}=\dfrac{1}{9}.\]
Second method:In this method we consider differentsums which are 2-12 that is a total of 11 sums.But onlyone satisfies our condition which is 9.Thus,P(E)=111.Please help.
#Combinatorics
#Probability
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
@Azhaghu Roopesh M @Satvik Golechha
Log in to reply
The probability of appearing of the different sums from 2 to 12 is different because for 2, you have only 1 option, that is , (1,1), but for 5, you can have (1,4), (2,3), (3,2), and (4,1). So, method 1 is correct.
Log in to reply
oh!thanxxx!!
I'm truly very sorry dude , I didn't check my mail account today so I didn't come to know that you had mentioned me here . It's just by accident (I was checking the Explore tab for the first time !!) that I came to know of this .
Well, it seems Satvik has clarified your doubt :) . Sorry again !!
BTW I'm asking Calvin sir to devise a method so that we can get Notifications whenever someone mentions us in the Notifications tab . If possible reply to my comment at Calvin sir's messageboard so that he notices this inconvenience .
Log in to reply
Hey!No problem man!
My take on this is 212. When you throw a pair of dice, there are 21 possible outcome: 1-1,1-2 the same as 2-1, 1-3 the same as 3-1...and so on. That is equal to 6C2+6. Since there are 2 possible combinations that give a sum of 9: 6 and 3 combination and the 4 and 5 then it is equal 212.
Edit: This is under the assumption that one of the dice cannot be distinguished from the other. However, if one of the dice is colored blue then your first solution applies.
Log in to reply
You're making the same mistake as the OP. Just because there are 21 possible outcomes, doesn't mean they occur with the same probability. Your edit clearly shows why. How does changing the color of the die change the sum of the dice? What if I'm colorblind, does that mean that if someone watches the same dice rolls with me, he'll see different sums with different probabilities?
Take a simpler example of 2 dice. The possible outcomes according to you are (1,1),(1,2),(2,2).But if you try this example in real life, you'll find that (1,1) occurs half the times (1,2) does. Why? Because if we take ordered pairs, we can see that (1,2) can be achieved two ways, (1,2) and (2,1) whereas (1,1) can only be achieved one way (1,1).
Edit:- Just remembered an even simpler example. The lottery. Technicalities aside, there are only two outcomes, win or lose. But we all know that the probability of winning is not 21
Log in to reply
Thanxx!I got it!
What do you mean by "OP" ?
Log in to reply
Even if you are color blind that does not change the fact that one die can be distinguished from the other.
If the two dice can be distinguished from one another, they become independent events.
Log in to reply
Sorry. I thought your definition of being distinguishable was based on perception. Nvm. Anyways. So what you're saying means that being "distinguishable" is an intrinsic property of a dice. That is, It doesn't matter if I can't distinguish between them or not, they are intrinsically "distinguishable". And a pair of dice which does not satisfy this is "indistinguishable".
But this leads to absurd conclusions. Like for example, if I make a small dot on one of a pair of "indistinguishable dice" , the probability of getting a sum of 9 suddenly changes, even though the dot has negligible effect of the physical properties of the dice.
Or what about if I track one of the die with a laser pointer or with my eye? Even that makes the die distinguishable. This will lead to different outcomes just if I look at the die. I know this occurs in quantum mechanics, but dice are too big for it too apply.
Anyways, that was not even the main point I was trying to make. The main point was that the fact that there are 21 different outcomes does not mean the all occur with the same probability.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Could you elaborate? I addressed this in my first comment. By the same logic, if I take winning the lottery as one event and not winning the lottery as the second, I have a 21 chance of winning the lottery. Just because you define some things as events doesn't make the probability of them occurring equal.
I agree, but that doesn't mean that EVERY change in conditions will result in a change in probability. You are taking extreme examples in which either we have new information(what is on the first dice after the first dice has stopped rolling) or the whole experiment is changed ( rolling one die instead of 2.).
You also haven't answered what I wrote before. How does adding a small dot, or even just looking at a die change the probability of getting a certain sum.
Log in to reply
In a lottery what are the possible outcome, not win or lose. The outcome is the possible combination of numbers. Winning or losing is the effect of the outcome.
Probability changes depending on the condition. Say you ask what is the probability of getting a sum of 9 when one of the dice has stopped rolling and showing one.
Log in to reply
Addendum: With distinguishable dice, you can identify 2-1 from 1-2, even 1-1 from 1-1 making them additional outcome.
The analogy does not apply...
LOL this was a question in my model exam which I badly flunked >:o
Log in to reply
BTW Which model exam , do you mean for Boards ?
Log in to reply
Yup! :P
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
If you want , you can visit this link to see the names :)
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
I thought they only tell you your grades? Not your marks. I don't remember getting my marks.
Log in to reply
what do u mean by "badly flunked" u r Level 5 in Combi
Log in to reply
I hate calculations. End up making silly mistakes, end up flunking exams :3
Log in to reply