I recently found a very interesting Algebraic Identity: xyz+(x+y)(y+z)(z+x)=(x+y+z)(xy+yz+zx)
What's so special about it? Note that going from one side of the equality to the other, all products are switched with sums, and all sums are switched with products!
This may be seen a bit easier if I rewrite it as follows: = x×y×z)+(x+y)×(y+z)×(z+x)(x+y+z)×(x×y+y×z)+z×x)
Cool!
#Algebra
#AlgebraicIdentities
#Sum
#JustForFun
#Product
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Yes; I really like this identity too. For example it can be used to prove that r1+r2+r3−r=4R (from Incircles and Excircles). If we substitute x=s−a etc., then
s(s−b)(s−c)+s(s−c)(s−a)+s(s−a)(s−b)−(s−a)(s−b)(s−c)=abc
where s is the semi-perimeter, and this reduces nicely using area formulas to the desired relationship.
Log in to reply
@Michael Ng created this problem which uses the identity.
thanks @Daniel Liu i used this to solve problems like this i wrote a solution using this identity, and i'm thinking about a problem with this identity, will post soon!
I didn't realise that- thanks. It should inspire some good problems :)
F B U L O U S !!!!!!
Typo. x is missed in color version, line 5.
I didn't examine. Good for making questions. However, it could have been found by people in the past.
Log in to reply
Yea, I'm just saying that I just noticed it. I most likely was not the person who discovered it (as seen by the comment by Michael Ng)
Log in to reply
I had just expanded both sides to compare. Should be correct. Do not feel disappointed by what I guessed. You could be the first person to find this. Congratulation!
Thanks. I did not realize this very useful identity.
Most awesome discoveries ever!Thanks,this must help a lot.
It's following the rules of principle of duality
Log in to reply
No, that is not the principle of duality.
Log in to reply
I mean l'll bit similar to that