Let \(P(x)=x^{3}-3b^{2}x+16\). If \(P(|x|)\) has exactly two real roots, then the area bounded by \(y=P(x)\) and \(x\)-axis is?
The answer is infinite. Because if is a root of then is also a root of . This means can have only one real root either or .This means that intersects the -axis once. So area bounded by it and must be infinite.
This question was posted by me . And Pi Han goh and Calvin lin reported it and deleted it saying answer is not always infinity. But answer is always infinite .
Please tell me if I am right .
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I disagree with " P(∣x∣) has exactly two real roots means that P(x) can have only one real root". What is true is
As an explicit example, we could have P(−10)=P(−4)=P(6)=0. Then if we solve for P(∣x∣)=0, we only get the roots x=6,−6.
Do you see the error in your argument? When you said "because if ω is a root", what should that actually be?
Please be mindful of your title. I generally have a very good reason if I believe that something is wrong. It would be better for you to ask "Why was this problem deleted" instead of claiming that "Calvin Lin solved this wrongly". Of course, I do admit that there are times that I solve the problem / resolve the report incorrectly, because I'm speed reading through it / missed a condition.
Log in to reply
Sir but here product of roots is −16 . So the case stated by you doesn't satisfy.
Log in to reply
Yes I know. I was only responding to the specific condition of "If P(∣x∣) has exactly two real roots, what can we conclude?", and your conclusion of "P(x) can have only one real root" is false.
Note that there is no explicit counter example to the entire problem, because there are no polynomials which satisfy the conditions that you stated, namely
1. P(x)=x3−3b2x+16
2. P(∣x∣) has 2 real roots counted with multiplicity.
Reasoning: From condition 1, since P(0)>0, and we have a leading coefficient of 1, the polynomial either has 2 positive real roots (with multiplicity) or 0 positive real roots. As explained above, condition 2 implies that there is exactly 1 positive real root.
Thus, that's another reason for deletion, since your problem is about the empty set.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
b are your conditions satisfied?
How is the question valid? For what value of@Pi Han Goh @Calvin Lin
Substitute b=±2, the answer is 24.
Log in to reply
When b=2,−2 P(∣x∣) has three real roots 2,2,−2 and as 2 is a repeated root we consider that P(∣x∣) has three real roots with 2 as the repeated root. And in question it is strictly mentioned that P(∣x∣) has exactly two real roots. So please notice this and tell that whether I am right or wrong .
Log in to reply
Then you should mention that we're counting the multiplicity of the roots.
And are you counting complex roots as well? If so, you need to make it explicit.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
ω, a third root of unity in your solution?
Then why isLog in to reply
ω is a variable
Log in to reply
b that gives the answer of infinity?
So what is the value ofMy understanding of cubics is that if it has a complex root, ia + ib, then a - ib is also a root, so a cubic always has 1 real root or 3 real roots. so the question is meaningless. Ed Gray
@Shivam Jadhav, knowing Pi Han Goh and Calvin Lin, I don't think they could possibly get anything incorrect.