\(1 + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{4} + ... =\)
Where is a prime number.
As each of the sums in the brackets are >1, the product of all of these terms is divergent (as there are infinitely many primes and the product of infinite terms all >1 can't be finite*). Therefore, the harmonic series is divergent.
I decided to write this after reading other proofs of this. It's most likely already been done more rigorously centuries ago so if you know who first came up with a similar proof please post a link in the comment section. And also if anyone could actually prove point *. Sorry if the title ('proof') was misleading.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
You can also group these terms as such : 1 + (1/2) + (1/3+1/4) + ( 1/5+1/6+1/7)+( 1/8+1/9+1/10+1/11+1/12) and so forth... => 1 + 1/2+ 7/12 + 107/210 +2021/3960...
7/12>1/2 , 107/210>1/2 and 2021/3960 > 1/2. Thus, this series diverges slowly.
Hi Nucky,
The idea an infinite product of terms all greater than 1 implies that the series diverges turns out not to be true. A famous example is k=1∏∞(1+ak1)=e where a1=1 and ak+1=(k+1)(ak+1) for all k>1. I tried proving the harmonic series diverges in a similar way once and had the same assumption!