This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
I don't have much problem with the new brilliant. I just want it to be a bit more colorful and the fonts to be bolder. The rest of the changes are good.
@Silas Hundt
–
Specifically, the colour scheme should be a little more bright. Also, The community button i.e. the link to the community should follow when we scroll. Otherwise we have to scroll all the way back up to go to the community.
Also, there is a bug I noticed. Edited notes aren't being edited. I mean, You may notice that the note says "what I was was this!" I changed it to "What I saw was this", but I doesn't seem to have been edited.
Thanks anyway. And sorry for the trouble caused. Kudos! to the brilliant staff.
Specifically, the colour scheme should be a little more bright.
Ok, we'll think about that more.
Also, The community button i.e. the link to the community should follow when we scroll. Otherwise we have to scroll all the way back up to go to the community.
Ok, we'll take that under consideration.
Also, there is a bug I noticed. Edited notes aren't being edited. I mean, You may notice that the note says "what I was was this!" I changed it to "What I saw was this", but I doesn't seem to have been edited.
I've tried and cannot reproduce this bug. Are you positive that you saved the note?
@Aditya Kumar
–
@Aditya Kumar I think that we should give the B'ant staff some time to stabilize this interface. I agree I was the one who started this, but I guess they know better :)
I agree it was a bit of a shock to experience the new format this morning, but now that I've spent 15 minutes familiarizing myself with it I find it quite acceptable. I found the previous format "friendlier" from an aesthetic point of view, but this format seems more precise and evolved. Any change requires an adjustment period, so I think we should give it a few days before making any substantive judgements.
@Calvin Lin One issue I've found thus far is that when I'm on the Community page and click on the "Following" feed the screen is "messed up". The entries don't start until I scroll down a page and a half and is offset to the left, so much so that portions of the entries are cut off. The "Everything" feed is fine, though.
It seems most people are unhappy with the current User Interface of Brilliant. Well, @Silas Hundt let me use this version of Brilliant since the last two weeks. You'll be really shocked to know that, at the initial phase of this version, you can't even imagine how stupid this UI looked. Fortunately, the team worked on the issues, fixed a lot of issues and bugs, and then finally decided to continue with this almost perfected UI permanently, probably. I have experienced this UI for over two weeks, and I've synced with it perfectly. This UI is really very simple, and precise. You'll seriously love it after you get synced with it. Be Patient :P :D
By the way, the Brilliant Team has worked so hard to construct and fix this UI, for days! I don't think they'd revert back to the previous UI unless a major problem arises with the current UI!
I don't see any reason of changing the interface so very often. A person cannot familiarize with the format so quickly. The site should be much more concentrated to its primary objective i.e. to enhance problem solving skills. The new interface has shortened the font of the posts a lot and increased the font of "In response to ..." a lot which gives a wrong impression on the objectives of Brilliant.
@Satyajit Mohanty
–
Oh! okay, I'll wait. BTW, there is a bug I saw. Whenever I scroll down on the problems page and open one, the scroll goes back to the top(in the background). Are you having this problem?
We change the interface to reflect what we have learnt about how people use Brilliant. We also update it to test various features. For example, you will notice that we now have a new "Featured wiki of the day", to highlight some of the great wiki pages that have arisen from the wiki collaboration parties.
We are still focused on enhancing your problem solving skills. The main feedback that we have received with regards to this is "How do I improve if I can't do these problems?". We had gone with "here are some basic problems in each skill to work on", as a way to ensure that they knew the basic material. However, that wasn't sufficient, and so we are improving the wiki writeups to provide relevant information for people to successfully problem solve.
Noted about the large bold font size. Our designer is aware of it.
Calvin, as much talk and effort that's going into Brilliant.org wikis, I hardly get the chance to see them, unless I do a search for them. I like the new "Featured wiki...", and if I were up to me, I'd have another one of those magical filter toggles that lets me switch to a wiki universe where I can peruse them as I would peruse a daily news paper. Brilliant.org doesn't have to be either 1) just problems, or 2) schooling stuff. I would find it sad if nobody else is that interested in the wikis.
I agree with Aditya Kumar, in that while the "new Brilliant.org" is now laid out more efficiently, which I like, easier to use and find things, with increased attention to wiki pages (which never seems enough!), what got lost was "color". Use of color is now subtle, found in tiny fonts, bullet points, and colored round miniatures that passes for avatars. And the pictures that go with posted problems and notes have become marginalized, so that I can't quickly locate a particular post any more, and it doesn't look so fun. The overall appearance of Brilliant.org has become something appropriate for specialists, like Scripta Mathematica--very serious and studious and also no longer in publication.
While I recognize that Brilliant.org is an ever-evolving project, you do need to have "flash" and some opportunity for fun. I would lose interest in Brilliant.org if it reminds me too much of going back to school that has serious and humorless overseers. I don't need to go through that again, I can afford not to.
Thank you for this articulate and specific feedback. We are working on improvements to the icons and a few other issues right now that should help.
I'll add that we do want Brilliant to be "appropriate for specialists" as well as being fun. Perhaps this balance is impossible, but that won't stop us from trying :)
Silas, as I've repeatedly said before, it's all about the use of filters, i.e., we should be able to pick and choose what kind of reality we want. Isn't that how things are trending in life, anyway? Imagine if we had a toggle by which we could choose between "for serious minded specialists only" and "hey, math party time!" universes. And more, of course, why not.
The new Brilliant.org give me more harder to comment. When i want to comment in the discussion, i must scroll down, scroll more that 100 comment. Plus, i want to recognize people in brilliant by their profile picture, now i can't remember ore that 30 member in here. The font making my eye really hard to read. Plus, i don't know was the comment that people post new or old
@Silas Hundt Lol my comments about "totalitarianism" are holding more water from your recent removal of my notes/pics. Come on it's a joke. No big deal - I already gave up on this website's interface. It's the people that matter - and while they're here, I'm here. But yeah all these restrictions ultimately result in my putting out less content - for as I explore my old posts, lots of unnecessary edits are made without my permission - for which I will not stand.
John, for me your Brilliant.org posts are a lot of fun, and I would be sorry to either see you go or see you get so edited that it would be like trying to listen to a Bill Maher monologue aired at a public school--after edits. I think part of the problem is that Brilliant.org doesn't have 100% control over its moderators that are able to make such edits, nor have the time to review all the times such edits are made. I sense that there could be a tension between those that think Brilliant.org could be a place to have fun, and those that think it's no place for such fun. My advice to you is that at least understand that Brilliant.org is still evolving and trying to find the right mix. But you have at least one follower that is solidly in your corner.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I don't have much problem with the new brilliant. I just want it to be a bit more colorful and the fonts to be bolder. The rest of the changes are good.
Log in to reply
I guess that would make it real better, isn't it? This is just too dull.
Log in to reply
Yes. But I don't see the requirement of posting a note of protest. I could just have mentioned it on slack.
Thanks for your feedback @Mehul Arora. We aren't going to be reverting the entire change. Do you have any specific suggestions?
Log in to reply
Also, there is a bug I noticed. Edited notes aren't being edited. I mean, You may notice that the note says "what I was was this!" I changed it to "What I saw was this", but I doesn't seem to have been edited.
Thanks anyway. And sorry for the trouble caused. Kudos! to the brilliant staff.
Log in to reply
Ok, we'll think about that more.
Ok, we'll take that under consideration.
I've tried and cannot reproduce this bug. Are you positive that you saved the note?
I love trouble.
Log in to reply
Thanks so much! May I delete this note now? :P
Log in to reply
Yes , more colourful and a little enlarged font will do.
Log in to reply
Which color do u prefer for brilliant??
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
@Aditya Kumar You see? Atleast someone who supports me!
Log in to reply
@Aditya Kumar and @Nihar Mahajan -- thanks for the feedback. We will take it under consideration.
Log in to reply
Can u change the color to dark green as it was earlier?
Log in to reply
@Aditya Kumar I think that we should give the B'ant staff some time to stabilize this interface. I agree I was the one who started this, but I guess they know better :)
Log in to reply
I agree it was a bit of a shock to experience the new format this morning, but now that I've spent 15 minutes familiarizing myself with it I find it quite acceptable. I found the previous format "friendlier" from an aesthetic point of view, but this format seems more precise and evolved. Any change requires an adjustment period, so I think we should give it a few days before making any substantive judgements.
@Calvin Lin One issue I've found thus far is that when I'm on the Community page and click on the "Following" feed the screen is "messed up". The entries don't start until I scroll down a page and a half and is offset to the left, so much so that portions of the entries are cut off. The "Everything" feed is fine, though.
Calvin edit: This issue has been fixed.
Just keep on solving and posting...
It seems most people are unhappy with the current User Interface of Brilliant. Well, @Silas Hundt let me use this version of Brilliant since the last two weeks. You'll be really shocked to know that, at the initial phase of this version, you can't even imagine how stupid this UI looked. Fortunately, the team worked on the issues, fixed a lot of issues and bugs, and then finally decided to continue with this almost perfected UI permanently, probably. I have experienced this UI for over two weeks, and I've synced with it perfectly. This UI is really very simple, and precise. You'll seriously love it after you get synced with it. Be Patient :P :D
By the way, the Brilliant Team has worked so hard to construct and fix this UI, for days! I don't think they'd revert back to the previous UI unless a major problem arises with the current UI!
Log in to reply
Thanks for the support. If you have any other feedback, please let us know!
I don't see any reason of changing the interface so very often. A person cannot familiarize with the format so quickly. The site should be much more concentrated to its primary objective i.e. to enhance problem solving skills. The new interface has shortened the font of the posts a lot and increased the font of "In response to ..." a lot which gives a wrong impression on the objectives of Brilliant.
@Calvin Lin
Log in to reply
Also Sir, how would I know if I have already solved a problem or not. There is no indicator coming.
Log in to reply
I've also requested @Silas Hundt a week ago to note this issue. I hope they'll add it in a few days ⌣¨
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Thanks for your feedback!
We change the interface to reflect what we have learnt about how people use Brilliant. We also update it to test various features. For example, you will notice that we now have a new "Featured wiki of the day", to highlight some of the great wiki pages that have arisen from the wiki collaboration parties.
We are still focused on enhancing your problem solving skills. The main feedback that we have received with regards to this is "How do I improve if I can't do these problems?". We had gone with "here are some basic problems in each skill to work on", as a way to ensure that they knew the basic material. However, that wasn't sufficient, and so we are improving the wiki writeups to provide relevant information for people to successfully problem solve.
Noted about the large bold font size. Our designer is aware of it.
Log in to reply
Calvin, as much talk and effort that's going into Brilliant.org wikis, I hardly get the chance to see them, unless I do a search for them. I like the new "Featured wiki...", and if I were up to me, I'd have another one of those magical filter toggles that lets me switch to a wiki universe where I can peruse them as I would peruse a daily news paper. Brilliant.org doesn't have to be either 1) just problems, or 2) schooling stuff. I would find it sad if nobody else is that interested in the wikis.
I agree with Aditya Kumar, in that while the "new Brilliant.org" is now laid out more efficiently, which I like, easier to use and find things, with increased attention to wiki pages (which never seems enough!), what got lost was "color". Use of color is now subtle, found in tiny fonts, bullet points, and colored round miniatures that passes for avatars. And the pictures that go with posted problems and notes have become marginalized, so that I can't quickly locate a particular post any more, and it doesn't look so fun. The overall appearance of Brilliant.org has become something appropriate for specialists, like Scripta Mathematica--very serious and studious and also no longer in publication.
While I recognize that Brilliant.org is an ever-evolving project, you do need to have "flash" and some opportunity for fun. I would lose interest in Brilliant.org if it reminds me too much of going back to school that has serious and humorless overseers. I don't need to go through that again, I can afford not to.
Log in to reply
Thank you for this articulate and specific feedback. We are working on improvements to the icons and a few other issues right now that should help.
I'll add that we do want Brilliant to be "appropriate for specialists" as well as being fun. Perhaps this balance is impossible, but that won't stop us from trying :)
Log in to reply
Silas, as I've repeatedly said before, it's all about the use of filters, i.e., we should be able to pick and choose what kind of reality we want. Isn't that how things are trending in life, anyway? Imagine if we had a toggle by which we could choose between "for serious minded specialists only" and "hey, math party time!" universes. And more, of course, why not.
Log in to reply
Better, cheaper, and more likely to succeed to pursue balance.
Log in to reply
Thanks for reminding us about not being school. That's certainly not what we want!
This feedback is extremely helpful, and we are working it in.
The new Brilliant.org give me more harder to comment. When i want to comment in the discussion, i must scroll down, scroll more that 100 comment. Plus, i want to recognize people in brilliant by their profile picture, now i can't remember ore that 30 member in here. The font making my eye really hard to read. Plus, i don't know was the comment that people post new or old
I think you should learn to adapt with different environments...!!!
@Calvin Lin @Arron Kau @Silas Hundt @John Muradeli
Log in to reply
What difference does it make although earlier one had better looks
Hi @Mehul Arora I'd be happy to respond if and when you provide substantive and specific feedback. Thanks!
Log in to reply
Is this permanent???? NOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Log in to reply
@Lee Cho -- do you have any substantive and specific feedback?
HiOOH HELL NOO. RISE BRILLIANT! OUR SITE IS BEING TAKEN FROM US BY THE TOTALITARIAN ADMINISTRATION CONTROL!
Boycott Brilliant2 membership!
Log in to reply
LOL
@Silas Hundt Lol my comments about "totalitarianism" are holding more water from your recent removal of my notes/pics. Come on it's a joke. No big deal - I already gave up on this website's interface. It's the people that matter - and while they're here, I'm here. But yeah all these restrictions ultimately result in my putting out less content - for as I explore my old posts, lots of unnecessary edits are made without my permission - for which I will not stand.
Do what you think is best. You know better.
Log in to reply
Which restrictions?
John, for me your Brilliant.org posts are a lot of fun, and I would be sorry to either see you go or see you get so edited that it would be like trying to listen to a Bill Maher monologue aired at a public school--after edits. I think part of the problem is that Brilliant.org doesn't have 100% control over its moderators that are able to make such edits, nor have the time to review all the times such edits are made. I sense that there could be a tension between those that think Brilliant.org could be a place to have fun, and those that think it's no place for such fun. My advice to you is that at least understand that Brilliant.org is still evolving and trying to find the right mix. But you have at least one follower that is solidly in your corner.