This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
The mualphatheta link has (almost) this question set as a problem - the answer link did not work for me. Note that xp(x)−1 is a degree 9 polynomial with 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 as zeros, and hence
xp(x)−1=A(x−1)(x−2)(x−3)(x−4)(x−5)(x−6)(x−7)(x−8)(x−9)
Putting x=0 we see that −1=−A×9! and so A=9!1. Then 10p(10)−1=A×9!=1, and hence p(10)=51.
As a side note, you should verify that x1+9!1∏i=19(x−i)
is indeed a polynomial. This follows because the constant term in the numerator cancels out, so it is a multiple of x.
It is possible (especially in scenarios where the exact roots are uncertain), for the function that you define to end up being a rational function, instead of a polynomial.
I already did this when I evaluated A, because I chose the value of A to be such that the value of
1+Aj=1∏9(x−j)
when x=0 was 0, which means that this polynomial has no constant term and hence can be safely divided by x.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
The mualphatheta link has (almost) this question set as a problem - the answer link did not work for me. Note that xp(x)−1 is a degree 9 polynomial with 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 as zeros, and hence xp(x)−1=A(x−1)(x−2)(x−3)(x−4)(x−5)(x−6)(x−7)(x−8)(x−9) Putting x=0 we see that −1=−A×9! and so A=9!1. Then 10p(10)−1=A×9!=1, and hence p(10)=51.
Log in to reply
As a side note, you should verify that x1+9!1∏i=19(x−i)
is indeed a polynomial. This follows because the constant term in the numerator cancels out, so it is a multiple of x.
It is possible (especially in scenarios where the exact roots are uncertain), for the function that you define to end up being a rational function, instead of a polynomial.
Log in to reply
I already did this when I evaluated A, because I chose the value of A to be such that the value of 1+Aj=1∏9(x−j) when x=0 was 0, which means that this polynomial has no constant term and hence can be safely divided by x.
This will do it : http://www.mualphatheta.org/problemcorner/MathematicalLog/Issues/0402/MathematicalLogProblemistSpring02.aspx
Try remainder theorem, although it will take many steps.
you can use newton-ramphson techhnique, newton forward or backward formula . it will be easy .