This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
Explanation of cryptic hint: By Fermat's Two square theorem, since 65=5×13=(22+12)(22+32), we can write 65 as the sum of two (positive) squares in two distinct ways.
You have 3 variables and 2 equations, so you do not have a completely determined system.
Though, the claim is that a2−b2+c2 is independent of the actual values. The point of the question is to prove that the expression is always equal to 1.
I don't know whether this method is valid , but we learn from mistakes and hence, I try:
Computing for b from both the equations,
b=7a+8c−4=47+c−8a
Now simplifying the two equations at the right , we get 12a+5c=13⇒12(13a)+5(13c)=132 which imitates the Pythagorean triplet 122+52=132 and then comparing them we have 13a=12,13c=5 which when substituted in the either of the first equations , we have b=0. Now substituting the acquired values in required expression we have a2−b2+c2=1.
This solution is incomplete since it assumes that 13a,13c are integers.
This method doesn't constitute a proof, since you're essentially substituting b=0,a=1312,c=135.
If you want a proof by substitution, you could
1. Determine a and b in terms of c only.
2. Substitute these values into a2−b2+c2.
3. Hope that everything cancels out (which it should, if your arithmetic is correct).
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Denote the two equations (1) and (2) respectively:
(1)−2(2) gives us a+b=32(1+c)
2(1)+(2) gives us a−b=23(1−c)
So a2−b2+c2=(a+b)(a−b)+c2=1−c2+c2=1.
Nice question
Cryptic Hint: 65=5×13. These are both primes of the form 1(mod4).
Log in to reply
Don't you mean "of the form 1(mod4)"?
Log in to reply
Oooops, yes I do. Edited. Thanks!
Sir, can you explain how you got this? I'm sorry I do not know this method. :)
Log in to reply
Direct Hint: 65=12+82=72+42
Explanation of cryptic hint: By Fermat's Two square theorem, since 65=5×13=(22+12)(22+32), we can write 65 as the sum of two (positive) squares in two distinct ways.
Log in to reply
We can use matrices to find the values of a,b,c
Log in to reply
You have 3 variables and 2 equations, so you do not have a completely determined system.
Though, the claim is that a2−b2+c2 is independent of the actual values. The point of the question is to prove that the expression is always equal to 1.
I don't know whether this method is valid , but we learn from mistakes and hence, I try:
Computing for b from both the equations,
b=7a+8c−4=47+c−8a
Now simplifying the two equations at the right , we get 12a+5c=13⇒12(13a)+5(13c)=132 which imitates the Pythagorean triplet 122+52=132 and then comparing them we have 13a=12 , 13c=5 which when substituted in the either of the first equations , we have b=0. Now substituting the acquired values in required expression we have a2−b2+c2=1.
This solution is incomplete since it assumes that 13a,13c are integers.
Log in to reply
This method doesn't constitute a proof, since you're essentially substituting b=0,a=1312,c=135.
If you want a proof by substitution, you could
1. Determine a and b in terms of c only.
2. Substitute these values into a2−b2+c2.
3. Hope that everything cancels out (which it should, if your arithmetic is correct).
Slightly easier approach that follows from my hint. Consider:
(a−7b+8c)2+(8a+4b−c)2
Notice that the cross terms cancel out.
This exploits the symmetry of the values, and the observation that 12+82=42+72.
2^{0}
0
Eliminating a,b,c one by one from both equations we get 3 equations:
13a+5b=12 ...1
13c−12b=5 ...2
12a−5c=13 ...3
Again by elimination of each of a,b and c,we get a=1213,b=−125,c=0
Putting them in a2−b2+c2 we get 1.
Log in to reply
It is wrong to simply assume that c=0. We must show that the answer is independent of c.