Hello all! I have been trying the following question for quite some time and haven't been able to reach the answer. I hope you math geniuses could shed some light on this and help me to get through this. :)
Let xk=k for k≤31 and xk+1=kx1+x2+.........+xk for k≥31. Also let yk=xk for k≤31 and yk+1=31yk+yk−1.......yk−30 for k≥31. Now if zk=yk−xk for all k∈N. Find limn→∞zn.
I was only able to figure out xk+1=xk+2=xk+3.....=16 for k≥31. The trouble is finding limn→∞yn. I have no idea about how would I go on evaluating this.
Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
represent the limit of the sequence based on 31 consecutive terms by f(y1,y2...y31), and observe that every change in any of the initial yi affects the limit linearly (this needs to be shown!)
In other words, f(y1,y2,y3...,y31) = (m1)(y1) + (m2)(y2) + ... + (m31)(y31) for some constants mi. Furthermore, observe that sum(mi) = 1, since decreasing all of them by x uniformly obviously reduces f by x.
Also observe that f(y2,y3,y4...,y32) = f(y1,y2,...y_31), that is,
(Note: mi is always the same regardless of the values of yi. Thus, its worth it to substitute more simple values - try f(1,0,0,0,0,0,0,....,0), f(0,1,0,0,0,0...) and so on.)
f(1,0,0,...0) = f(0,0,0,....1/31) implying m31 = 31m1
f(0,1,0,0,0....,0) = f(1,0,0....,0,1/31) implying m2 = m1 + (1/31) (m31) = 2m1
f(0,0,1,0....,0) = f(0,1,...,0,1/31) implying m3 = m2 + (1/31)(m31) = 3m1
Inductively, we get what we want: m1:m2:m3:...:m31 = 1:2:3...:31
Since the sum of them is 1. m1 = 1/(496), m2 = 1/248 ... m_31 = 1/16
Substituting them in will give the desired answer.
Log in to reply
Thanks Gabriel for your time but I don't think I get it. This may be a dumb question but how did you bring f(y1,y2...y31)? Can't we simply is say that limit is infinite as the terms yk go on increasing (I found this by substituting a few values for k).
Thank you once again. :)
Log in to reply
basically, f(y1...y31) represents the limit of the sequence, given that it has 31 consecutive terms y1, y2 ..., y_31, as the limit of the sequence will not be dependent on previous elements.
You do in fact need to show the sequence converges, and that the function f is linear with respect to all yi. There's a theorem that says an infinite bounded set has a limit point - and the set of yi is clearly bounded between 1 and 31 - the theorem isnt sufficient, but it does suggest the sequence converges.
Log in to reply
Anyways, I have the solution too. The solution simply evaluates n→∞limyn as ∑n=131n∑n=131n2 and it was stated without proof so I had to post this here.
Log in to reply
(1/496) + (2)(2/496)+(3)(3/496) ... = (1^2+2^2+3^2+...+31^2)/(496)
= (sum n^2)/(sum n)
If we dispense with the need to prove the sequence converges to a fixed point, and assume it does, as we can now use the function notation and prove linearity very quickly:
f(y1,y2,....y31) - f(y1,y2....,y31+k) = f(y1,y2+....,y31+k) - f(y1,y2+....,y31 +2k) = ...
g(x) = f(y1,y2...y30,x) for fixed y1 to y_30
g(x+kd) = k(g(x+d) - g(x)), implying linearity over rationals.
(you can do the same for the other y_i)
Which you can see fairly easily. Because the function is clearly strictly increasing, and you can quickly prove it is linear for all rationals, it is also linear for reals.
Edit: in fact, if you don't need to prove convergence, you can also use the invariant.
For any 31 consecutive terms a1, a2, ...a31, sum( (i)(ai) ) is constant.
Substituting the initial values (1,2...,31) and comparing with (L,L,L...L) will quickly yield the value of limit L as well.
Log in to reply
I have got most of it but not completely. I am still trying to understand your posts. Can you tell me to which part of mathematics does this belong? I have never seen this kind of problem before. I will post if I get any doubts.
Thanks!
Log in to reply
I think the limit of yn is a case of infinite continued fraction series. If you solve y{k+1} it forms a continued fraction.
How many determinants of order 3by 3 can be formed , in which each element is either a or b (both non zero) and value of determinant is zero