a tricky problem by my math sir !

My math sir said that 'x' is the weight of an elephant and 'y' is the weight of an ant . both are different .Then he said He'll prove , x = y. This is how it goes ....

Let x+y = 2 ( a ) x=2(a)-y ..... (1) x-2(a)=(-y) ...(2)

Multiplying (1) and (2)., x(x-2a)= (2a-y)-y

x^2-2ax = y^2 - 2ay

x^2 - 2ax +a^2 = y^2 - 2ay +a^2 (Adding a^2 on both the sides )

(x-a)^2 = (y-a)^2 ( cancelling the squares .. )

x-a = y-a (cancelling a on both sides )

x=y !!!! (how is this possible ?)

i feel there is a mistake . How can we cancel off squares of DIFFERENT numbers x ,y when it is subtracted from a ?

What do you think guys ? give it a try !!

#Logic #HelpMe! #Proofs #MathProblem #Math

Note by Mihir Sriram Arnala
8 years, 2 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

In a similar train of thought, read Proof that 0=1, where the error made is similar to what was done above.

Calvin Lin Staff - 8 years, 2 months ago

x-a = y-a is the trivial solution, x=y=a=0. The other solution to the square root is x-a = - (y-a), which reproduces the original case.

Adam Silvernail - 8 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Another way of putting it is that solutions to the equation (xa)2=(ya)2 (x-a)^2 = (y-a)^2 is not the same as solutions to the equation (xa=ya (x-a = y-a . In the former, we could have xa=(ya) x-a = - (y-a) , which is a solution in the latter.

Steps like this, in which you do not consider if the solution set has stayed the same, are a common mistake. You need to be careful with taking square roots, as it is a multi-value function, which accounts for the missing / extra solutions.

As another example, the number of integer solutions to 1a+1b=1 \frac {1}{a} + \frac {1}{b} = 1 is not the same as the number of integer solutions to a+b=ab a + b = ab .

Calvin Lin Staff - 8 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, that was the more eloquent description of my response. Thanks!

Adam Silvernail - 8 years, 2 months ago

thankya everyone !! Nice help !! :)

Mihir Sriram Arnala - 8 years, 2 months ago

One more solution which i formed!!! Let 'e' be the weight of an elephant; 'a' be he weight of an ant;

such that e-a=d

then e=a+d

Multiplying both the sides by (e-a), we get:

e(e-a)=(a+d)(e-a)

=> e^2 - ae = ae - a^2 +de - ad

e^2 - ae - de = ae - a^2 - ad [Subtracting de from both sides]

e(e-a-d)=a(e-a-d) [taking e & a common]

====> e = a

Considering the fact that i know the fallacy in this solution and the law that has been broken!!!!!!

karthik suresh - 6 years, 2 months ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...