I'm sure almost all of you are familiar with Ramanujan's number, 1729. What about 87539319, or 6963472309248?
Define the th strict taxicab number as the smallest number which can be expressed as the sum of two positive integral cubes in exactly ways. Then, it turns out that and .
So I ask:
Obviously (I think) this is not a question we can currently answer. I don't even know if the sequence is bounded above. Still, I think it's a pretty fun question to ask as a sort of time capsule, to look at how far the tools of mathematics will sharpen in the decades to come.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
How did you derive T∗(3) and T∗(4)?
Log in to reply
nvm... heres the article
Actually, the regular (nonstrict) taxicab numbers T(n) is the most common definition. For small n it corresponds to T∗(n). I was thinking about whether or not it was possible if T∗(n)>T∗(n+1) for large n despite the latter being expressible in one more way than the other.