We studied that charge is conserved and mass is not conserved.suppose there is a electron with mass 9.10938291 × 10-31 kilograms and charge 1.60217657 × 10-19 coulombs.if we convert the whole the mass into energy what will happen to the charge?we have also studied that mass-less object can't carry charge.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
electron is a fundamental particle with a negative charge. to convert all of electron's mass to energy, one has to react the electron with the antimatter equivalent of the electron, which is a positron. A positron carries a positive charge. as such, charge is still conserved.
Log in to reply
is there any other method to convert electron into energy? can't we make energy,E=MeC^2(Me=mass of electron)from an electron?throw this method we get energy,E=2MeC^2
Log in to reply
The short answer: you can't. That's the beauty of physics. In order to uphold both the conservation of charge and the energy-mass equivalence, nature is such that the electron must annihilate with another particle with the opposite charge.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
charge remains intact.using the mass energy equation we do only get the energy equivalent of mass which is the all form of energy stored in the body.charge is its intrinsic property
Log in to reply
Suppose somehow we did convert electron's mass into energy then what? Its theoretically possible I suppose. Is there a reason why it can't be otherwise.
Log in to reply
theoritically it is possible to calculate but its too less and can be ignored i guess.and the use of equivalence of mass energy is the total energy stored in the body and to use it to the fullest i guess research might be going on....and total energy just mean the potential,kinetic,nuclear,gravitational and all forms of energy engulfed within the body forming the shape of the matter....
i didn't get the idea.please explain......
You have said that mass less objects cannot carry charge, can you please explain why is it so?
Log in to reply
I don't know.........but i heard it from different places
if there is charge, there must be electrons or protons, and they carry charge.
charge is carried by electrons and protons. If you convert them to energy I guess you lose charge.
Log in to reply
but charge is conserved.
Log in to reply
does the body get disappear??if no then the charge will always be conserved...we just lose the mass
i guess if we use all the energies(mass energy equivalence) inside the body the body dismantles and its no more the mass...so is the charge!
I think there should be relation between mass and charge carried by the object obeying the energy conservation!!!!
the charge will disappear with all the charges inside but with only a friction in the end some atomic nuclear (hypotenuse), E=mc^2 from the equation if you lose 1 gram of mass, it will create an energy greater that hiroshima nuclear bomb, the mass mostly come from neutron wich is neutral and only by losing the mass of the neutron can be converted to ''high energy density'', how about electron? the mass to given an energy is to ''small''.
what is the relation of mass with charge?