(i=1∑nai2)(i=1∑nbi2)≥(i=1∑naibi)2.
Equality condition in Cauchy-Schwarz is biai=k for all i but what happens when bi=0. When the denominator is zero it should be undefined, but zero may be an equality solution.
E.g. a2+b2+c2≥ab+bc+ca
By multiplying by 2 on both sides and a little rearrangement we get
(a−b)2+(b−c)2+(c−a)2≥0
Which is true for all reals a,b,c and also equality holds when a=b=c even when a=b=c=0
We can also solve this by Cauchy-Schwarz :-
(a2+b2+c2)(b2+c2+a2)≥(ab+bc+ca)2
Or, a2+b2+c2≥ab+bc+ca
And equality holds when,
ba=cb=ac=b+c+aa+b+c=1
Therfore, we get, a=b=c but a=b=c=0 will make the expression undefined but is also a valid solution.
Please help!!!
#Algebra
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Please explain your question from the start. Assume that the person reading this knows nothing about what you are writing.
Log in to reply
I have edited it and I think now it'll be easier to understand.
Log in to reply
Small correction at the end: setting a=b=c=0 will not make the expression undefined, but rather indeterminate (there is a HUGE difference between the two terms mathematically). May I also suggest replacing the a,b,c's with ai,bi's? It helps with the reading of the problem.
To answer your question directly (now that I have investigated the question after you have written up your question more clearly), if the bi's are zero, then equality still holds regardless; what you simply have is a degenerate case where the statement of when equality holds does not and cannot apply.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
bi's are zero, then it's obvious that both sides of the equation will have to be zero, regardless of what the ai's are... so you still have equality of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. My point was that the condition for equality is contingent on the fact that none of the bi's are zero.
What did you want to clarify? If it is my answer to your question, then what I am saying that if the