This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
To understand what is happening, let's modify the problem a little bit. Define S(n)=1+2+⋯+2n for all nonnegative integers n. In the original post, you are calculating "S - S" by summing the differences of the kth and (k+1)th terms of S, for each k=1,2,3,…. If you were to do this with S(n), you would see that we get S(n)−S(n)=(1−0)+(2−1)+(4−2)+⋯+(2n−2n−1)+(0−2n)=1+1+2+⋯+2n−1−2n. As you can see, the final term is negative, and this results in the identity 2n−1=1+2+4+⋯+2n−1=S(n). There is no contradiction.
Now, as n tends to infinity, we see that S(n)=2n−1 also tends to infinity, not −1. The flaw in the above "proof" is that writing S−S as an infinite series "hides" the existence of the term 0−2n in the finite series, which tends to −∞ as n→∞. It is because this term does not vanish to zero that the difference S - S cannot be said to be equal to 1 + S, and that is where your calculation is incorrect.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
To understand what is happening, let's modify the problem a little bit. Define S(n)=1+2+⋯+2n for all nonnegative integers n. In the original post, you are calculating "S - S" by summing the differences of the kth and (k+1)th terms of S, for each k=1,2,3,…. If you were to do this with S(n), you would see that we get S(n)−S(n)=(1−0)+(2−1)+(4−2)+⋯+(2n−2n−1)+(0−2n)=1+1+2+⋯+2n−1−2n. As you can see, the final term is negative, and this results in the identity 2n−1=1+2+4+⋯+2n−1=S(n). There is no contradiction.
Now, as n tends to infinity, we see that S(n)=2n−1 also tends to infinity, not −1. The flaw in the above "proof" is that writing S−S as an infinite series "hides" the existence of the term 0−2n in the finite series, which tends to −∞ as n→∞. It is because this term does not vanish to zero that the difference S - S cannot be said to be equal to 1 + S, and that is where your calculation is incorrect.
i think you can't substract both S if both of them are infinity... after all, 1+1+2+4+8+16+32+... can't be 0....