Main post link -> http://www.piyushclipboards.blogspot.in/2013/07/all-roads-lead-to-rome-conjecture.html
Here is a very simple but interesting conjecture.
Take any natural number n>=5. If n is composite (a number having factors other than 1 and itself), add up all of its prime factors. If n is prime (a number having only two factors: 1 and the number itself), just add one to it. Repeat the process indefinitely. The conjecture states that no matter what number you start with, you shall always eventually reach the 'Perfect Number 6'.
Can anybody prove it??
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Let f(n) be the sum of the prime factors of n if n is composite and n+1 if n is prime.
We must show that the sequence n,f(n),f(f(n)),f(f(f(n))),… has 6 in it.
Note that f(5)=6, 6=6, and f(f(7))=f(8)=6, Clearly, the conjecture holds for 5≤n≤7.
.
If n≥8 is composite, let n=∏pi for some primes pi not necessarily distinct. Then f(n)=∑pi.
If f(n)<5, then we must have the sum of two or more primes less than 5.
The only possibility is 2+2=4, but then n=2⋅2=4<8, a contradiction. Therefore, f(n)≥5.
Also, for each i, we have pi≤2n. So, pilnpi≥(n/2)ln(n/2), and thus, lnn=∑lnpi≥(n/2)ln(n/2)∑pi.
Therefore, f(n)=∑pi≤2nln(n/2)lnn=2nlnn−ln2lnn=2n1−lnnln21≤2n⋅23=43n≤n−2.
Hence, if n≥8 is composite, we have 5≤f(n)≤n−2.
.
If n≥8 is prime, then n+1≥8 is composite. Therefore, 5≤f(f(n))=f(n+1)≤n−1.
.
Therefore, if n≥8, we have either 5≤f(n)≤n−2 or 5≤f(f(n))≤n−1.
So, by principle of infinite descent, we have 5≤f(k)(n)≤7 for some finite positive integer k.
Then, since f(5)=6, 6=6, and f(f(7))=f(8)=6, the conjecture holds for all n≥8.
Therefore, the conjecture holds for all n≥5 as desired.
This reminds me of the mystery of the number 276. Find the sum of all of the proper divisors of 276, and then the sum of the proper divisors of that number, and repeat. Does this sequence ever settle down or become periodic? For perfect numbers, this sequence just repeats: s(6)=1+2+3=6...
If you can prove something about this, then it'll be worth publishing!
Log in to reply
Of course, it is much harder (if not impossible) to show that n,s(n),s(s(n)),… eventually has a term less than n. This makes that problem (as well as the Collatz Conjecture) difficult to solve.
I don't understand..i took 8, only prime factor is 2, i didn't end up in 6? am i supposed to add 2 three times since 23=8?
Log in to reply
Yeah, 8 has three prime factors 2.