This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
Just a couple of hints from someone who has been defeated by this problem :P
Where is the symmetry? Let f(x)=xx. We have f′(x)=xx(lnx+1), noticing f′(e1)=0. It means x=e1 is an inflection point of f(x). As x→0, we have that xx→1, thus for x>1,f(x) is injective, and no value in this interval will satisfy our desired condition.
Can we assume a simple or proportional symmetry? Because ∣e1−0∣=∣1−e1∣, the symmetry of pairs is not of the type e1±δ. A graphical analysis shows us that the symmetry is also not proportional: the left side is (e−1) times smaller than right side, but still f(e1−δ)=f(e1+(e−1)δ).
We are seeking REAL numbers α and β such that αα=ββ.
Let β=kα for a real number k . Substituting this in our condition and taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get:
(kα)kα=αα kαln(kα)=αln(α)
Rearranging, reducing, and using log properties, we get:
lnα=1−kklnk .
Then,using exponentials : elnα=e1−kklnk and thus elnα=(elnk)1−kk which is equivalent to α=k1−kk . Consequently, β=kα=k×k1−kk=k1+1−kk=k1−k1 . →β=k1−k1
Checking the values of k:
For k=1, we have α=β and this contradicts a condition in the question.
For k=0, we have β=0 which is rejected since α,β are positive.
for k<0, we have a negative α or β, so it is also rejected. Therefore :
The solution of the equation αα=ββ for α,β∈R is the set {(α,β)∣(α,β)=(k1−kk,k1−k1),∀k=1∧k∈R+}
Because f(x)=xx is injective for x>1, we have α,β<1. Let α⋅a=1,β⋅b=1. We now have that (a1)a1=(b1)b1⇔ab=ba.
The only Z−{0,1} solutions for (a,b) are permutations of (2,4) (trial and error!). Thus, we have found the only two rational pairs for (α,β), which are permutations of (21,41).
PS: A cheating at WolframAlpha tells me that the pairs are of the form
(x,eW(blogb))
where the function W(z) is the Lambert W function, defined one way by z=W(z)⋅eW(z).
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Just a couple of hints from someone who has been defeated by this problem :P
Where is the symmetry? Let f(x)=xx. We have f′(x)=xx(lnx+1), noticing f′(e1)=0. It means x=e1 is an inflection point of f(x). As x→0, we have that xx→1, thus for x>1,f(x) is injective, and no value in this interval will satisfy our desired condition.
Can we assume a simple or proportional symmetry? Because ∣e1−0∣=∣1−e1∣, the symmetry of pairs is not of the type e1±δ. A graphical analysis shows us that the symmetry is also not proportional: the left side is (e−1) times smaller than right side, but still f(e1−δ)=f(e1+(e−1)δ).
We are seeking REAL numbers α and β such that αα=ββ.
Let β=kα for a real number k . Substituting this in our condition and taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get:
(kα)kα=αα
kαln(kα)=αln(α)
Rearranging, reducing, and using log properties, we get:
lnα=1−kklnk . Then,using exponentials : elnα=e1−kklnk and thus elnα=(elnk)1−kk which is equivalent to α=k1−kk . Consequently, β=kα=k×k1−kk=k1+1−kk=k1−k1 . →β=k1−k1
Checking the values of k:
For k=1, we have α=β and this contradicts a condition in the question.
For k=0, we have β=0 which is rejected since α,β are positive.
for k<0, we have a negative α or β, so it is also rejected. Therefore :
The solution of the equation αα=ββ for α,β∈R is the set {(α,β)∣(α,β)=(k1−kk,k1−k1),∀k=1∧k∈R+}
Because f(x)=xx is injective for x>1, we have α,β<1. Let α⋅a=1,β⋅b=1. We now have that (a1)a1=(b1)b1⇔ab=ba.
The only Z−{0,1} solutions for (a,b) are permutations of (2,4) (trial and error!). Thus, we have found the only two rational pairs for (α,β), which are permutations of (21,41).
PS: A cheating at WolframAlpha tells me that the pairs are of the form
(x,eW(blogb))
where the function W(z) is the Lambert W function, defined one way by z=W(z)⋅eW(z).
I have no idea what I'm talking about.