This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
Let h(x)=2f(x)+g(x)−f(x)g(x). Then h(x)=2(f(x)−g(x))2. h(x) tending to zero is the same as f(x)−g(x) tending to zero. Multiplying by f(x)+g(x), f(x)-g(x) tending to zero is a sufficient condition. It is not necessary as can be seen by taking f(x) = x and g(x) = x + 1, which tends to (x+2x1)2 for large x.
sir I think that A.M = G.M condition could be applied only to linear functions
let us draw the graph of f(x) = x + 1/any polynomial
we would see that as if we see the curve of any linear polynomial (here x) the curve will go on to move upwards and here the L.H.L = R.H.L and here the condition am = gm satisfys
but if we see the graph of 1/any polynomial ( 1/x) we see the curve in 1st and 3rd quadrant
and L.H.L=R.H.L and so we cant apply limit in this case and thus here A.M=G.M I think so
@megh choksi Check this out -L=x→∞lim(x2+x+1)(x2+x+2)−x2−x
We can use the fact that x→∞lim(x2+x+1)(x2+x+2)=x→∞lim2(x2+x+1)+(x2+x+2) to solve this problem because x→∞lim(x2+x+2)(x2+x+1)=1 The answer comes to be 23.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Let h(x)=2f(x)+g(x)−f(x)g(x). Then h(x)=2(f(x)−g(x))2. h(x) tending to zero is the same as f(x)−g(x) tending to zero. Multiplying by f(x)+g(x), f(x)-g(x) tending to zero is a sufficient condition. It is not necessary as can be seen by taking f(x) = x and g(x) = x + 1, which tends to (x+2x1)2 for large x.
Log in to reply
On the other hand, if you take f(x)=4x2, g(x)=4x2+4x+1 then it is easy to see that h(x) goes to 1/2.
That's a good start. Can you find a simple necessary and sufficient condition?
Here is a related question to attempt - Manipulating Limits of Sequences
Log in to reply
Simpler than limit of sqrt(f(x)) - sqrt(g(x)) being 0?
sir I think that A.M = G.M condition could be applied only to linear functions
let us draw the graph of f(x) = x + 1/any polynomial
we would see that as if we see the curve of any linear polynomial (here x) the curve will go on to move upwards and here the L.H.L = R.H.L and here the condition am = gm satisfys
but if we see the graph of 1/any polynomial ( 1/x) we see the curve in 1st and 3rd quadrant and L.H.L=R.H.L and so we cant apply limit in this case and thus here A.M=G.M I think so
please point out my mistakes
Log in to reply
@megh choksi Check this out -L=x→∞lim(x2+x+1)(x2+x+2)−x2−x
We can use the fact that x→∞lim(x2+x+1)(x2+x+2)=x→∞lim2(x2+x+1)+(x2+x+2) to solve this problem because x→∞lim(x2+x+2)(x2+x+1)=1 The answer comes to be 23.
As mentioned previously, it does not hold for the linear functions f(x)=x,g(x)=3x, since clearly
2x=2x+3x=x×3x=3x.
You will need to refine your condition even more.