If we want to integrate
\(\LARGE \int \frac{dx}{xlnx}\)
We may use the integration by parts technique instead of substitution to get
I=∫xlnxdx=lnx1∫xdx−∫(−(lnx)21x1∫xdx)dx=lnx1lnx+∫xlnxdx=1+I⇒I=I+1⇒1=0
Which is (of course)wrong.
What we should see here is the importance of the arbitrary constant of integration C.
So if the constant of integration on the left hand side is C1 and on the right hand side the constant is C2, we may see that
C1−C2=1
Which resolves the fallacy.
We might well see that the functions on both the right and left hand side have the same derivative i.e. xln(x)1 ,proving that we are right.
We might have many interesting apparent "fallacies" as mentioned in this post .
#Calculus
#IntegrationByParts
#IntegrationTechniques
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
There are no comments in this discussion.