Today we're going to take a look at a strategy for logarithm multiplication. First, let's take a look at a problem.
(Note: all variables in this post are assumed to be in their respective domains)
What is log227×log364? One of the first things you should notice about this is that 27 and 64 are powers of the bases of the logarithms, but they are paired with the wrong base. However, you might be tempted to say that log227×log364=log264×log327=6×3=18, but you would first need to prove that this is true: logmA×lognB=lognA×logmB.
...........................................................................................................
Let's take a look at what change of base is. Change of base is a technique often used in approximating values of logarithms. Most scientific calculators cannot find logarithms with bases that aren't 2, 10, or e, but all of them have at least a button that finds the natural logarithm of a number. Change of base lets you split a logarithm so it is a lot easier to find on a calculator. Here's the formula.
logab=logkalogkb
If you take the logarithm base a of a number b, then you can take the logarithm base k of a and divide it by the logarithm base k of b to find the logarithm base a of b. For example, if you are told to find log37, using only a scientific calculator, then change of base allows you to do this.
log37=ln3ln7≈1.0986121.945910≈1.771244
(Note: approximation signs are used because of rounding to 6 decimal places.)
...........................................................................................................
So now let's take a look back at the generalization. We are trying to prove that logmA×lognB=lognA×logmB. Use change of base to split the logarithms.
logmA×lognB=lnmlnA×lnnlnB
Using the communative property of multiplication, you get this.
lnmlnA×lnnlnB=lnnlnA×lnmlnB
Finally, using reverse change of base, you can do this.
lnnlnA×lnmlnB=lognA×logmB
So that's it! We have proved that logmA×lognB=lognA×logmB. Now we can go back to the original problem.
To find log227×log364, you can switch the bases and say that log227×log364=log327×log264=3×6=18.
...........................................................................................................
This idea can also be applied over multiple multiplications too. Take a look at this problem.
Find k=2∏2047logk(k+1)
This is equal to log23×log34×log45×…×log20472048. Using the base-switching strategy, you can rearrange this to log22048×log33×log44×…×log20472047. Everything to the right of log22048 is equal to 1, so the value is equal to log22048=11.
...........................................................................................................
Problems
1 Prove that log1x does not exist.
2 Prove that k=1∏∞log2k(2k+3) is divergent.
3 Find the value of n→1lim(lognk×loghn).
...........................................................................................................
So you learned about multiplying logarithms. I hope that this strategy helps you in the future. Check the tag #TrevorsTips occasionally to see more problem solving strategies from me. Thanks for reading this post!
#Logarithms
#ProblemSolving
#Multiplication
#TrevorsTips
#ChangeOfBase
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I'm not that good with series, but I'll try: It's obvious that log2k(2k+3)>log2k(2k+2) for every k≥1; so, if k=1∏∞log2k(2k+2) diverges, then k=1∏∞log2k(2k+3) also diverges. But the former is equal to k→+∞limlog2log4⋅log4log6⋅log6log8⋯log2klog(2k+2)=k→+∞limlog2log(2k+2)=∞ So, the series converges.
As for the third, we have, for n=1,lognk⋅loghn=lognlogk⋅loghlogn=loghlogk=logh k; so, the limit is loghk.
Log in to reply
Perfect! That is exactly how I intended the second question to be solved!
Do you know how to justify that n→1limlognn=1? There's a couple different methods.
Log in to reply
It's simple: lognn=lognlogn. Since n=1 - by the limit, it goes to 1 - we have logn=0 and we can cancel them out, staying with an 1.
Log in to reply
It works really well here because you don't have to evaluate the function at values close to 1. Granted, it is a really simple function, but if you have other functions that are difficult to evaluate and you have an indeterminate form, you can use it.
Here, you do this. n→1limlognn=lnnlnn=n→1limn1n1=11=1
What if the second question was on ∏log2k(2k+1)? Then the telescoping trick used by Joao would not work immediately
The question I want to get to is:
What is the largest value of α such that ∏log2k(2k+α) is finite?
Note that α=0 works. Is that the largest possible value?
@Trevor B. Can you add this to the Number Bases Wiki, likely the Converting to Different Bases page.
As far as the first problem goes, it's impossible because if x isn't one, then it's impossible to multiply one's and get anything but one. And if it is one, they one to the anything is 1!
Log in to reply
It's possible to prove mathematically that it doesn't exist with a strategy in this discussion. Can you provide a proof based off of the information in the discussion?
Log in to reply
Using the change of base, we get log1x=ln1lnx. But ln1=0 and we can't have division by zero.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Happy birthday Trevor :).
Log in to reply
Thanks!
what is meant by divergence of a logarithm