This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
Suppose that the horizontal displacement of A from its starting position is x, and that the angle ∠BAC=2θ. Then A,B,C have position vectors
(Lcosθx)(0x−Lsinθ)(0x+Lsinθ)
respectively, so that the kinetic energy of the system is
T=21m(x˙2+L2sin2θθ˙2)+21m(x˙−Lcosθθ˙)2+m(x˙+Lcosθθ˙)2
Since the x-coordinate of the centre of mass of the system remains constant, we have 4x+Lsinθ=0 (the system starts with x=0, θ=0. Thus
T=81mL2(4+7cos2θ)θ˙2
and so conservation of energy gives
81mL2(4+7cos2θ)θ˙2+mgLcosθθ˙2=mgL=L(4+7cos2θ)8g(1−cosθ)
Thus the speed (not velocity) of A is v, where
v2=x˙2+L2sin2θθ˙2=161L2(1+15sin2θ)θ˙2=2(4+7cos2θ)gL(1−cosθ)(1+15sin2θ)
The question should say: "what is the speed of A when the rods make an angle θ with the horizontal", that that will create the necessary swap between sinθ and cosθ.
@Talulah Riley
–
The masses at the bottom do not affect the length of the rods! The uneven masses mean that x does not stay constant. If the masses at the bottom were equal, then x would remain zero throughout.
@Talulah Riley
–
Is it? The correct formula gives 1.311466408 when θ=30∘, which is not the official answer. When changing the angle from against the vertical to against the horizontal, don't you have to change your value of θ?
@Talulah Riley
–
Yes, but 1.311... is not the official answer. Should it be θ=60∘ and v=5.160468...? Or was the old idea that θ was the angle between the rods, in which case we now want θ=75∘ and v=7.8851...?
@Talulah Riley
–
I'm getting 1.311 for the speed of the hinge mass when the angle between the rod and the horizontal is 60 degrees. But it's rejecting that.
@Mark Hennings
–
So as I understand, θ is to the horizontal in the problem statement. The expression derived is by taking the angle definition as the half-angle to the vertical, so in the expression that I obtained, ϕ=θ should be 60 degrees instead of 30.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
@Lil Doug This is my attempt. Unable to tag KrishnaKarthik. Do tag him if possible
@Steven Chase @Mark Hennings Your inputs would be helpful.
Log in to reply
Hey; very nice approach. So this is what momentum is used for, outside of collisions, of course. Nice.
Suppose that the horizontal displacement of A from its starting position is x, and that the angle ∠BAC=2θ. Then A,B,C have position vectors (Lcosθx)(0x−Lsinθ)(0x+Lsinθ) respectively, so that the kinetic energy of the system is T=21m(x˙2+L2sin2θθ˙2)+21m(x˙−Lcosθθ˙)2+m(x˙+Lcosθθ˙)2 Since the x-coordinate of the centre of mass of the system remains constant, we have 4x+Lsinθ=0 (the system starts with x=0, θ=0. Thus T=81mL2(4+7cos2θ)θ˙2 and so conservation of energy gives 81mL2(4+7cos2θ)θ˙2+mgLcosθθ˙2=mgL=L(4+7cos2θ)8g(1−cosθ) Thus the speed (not velocity) of A is v, where v2=x˙2+L2sin2θθ˙2=161L2(1+15sin2θ)θ˙2=2(4+7cos2θ)gL(1−cosθ)(1+15sin2θ) The question should say: "what is the speed of A when the rods make an angle θ with the horizontal", that that will create the necessary swap between sinθ and cosθ.
@Karan Chatrath @Lil Doug
Log in to reply
@Mark Hennings Thanks but sir which rod?
Log in to reply
Both. They have to make the same angle with the ground, since they have the same length, and so triangle ABC is isosceles!
Log in to reply
@Mark Hennings But sir at right side mass is 2 times of left side. Still they will form an isosceles triangle
Log in to reply
x does not stay constant. If the masses at the bottom were equal, then x would remain zero throughout.
The masses at the bottom do not affect the length of the rods! The uneven masses mean thatLog in to reply
@Mark Hennings Thank you so much, the problem is corrected now.
Log in to reply
1.311466408 when θ=30∘, which is not the official answer. When changing the angle from against the vertical to against the horizontal, don't you have to change your value of θ?
Is it? The correct formula givesLog in to reply
@Mark Hennings So 1.311... and 30° are correct set.
Log in to reply
θ=60∘ and v=5.160468...? Or was the old idea that θ was the angle between the rods, in which case we now want θ=75∘ and v=7.8851...?
Yes, but 1.311... is not the official answer. Should it beLog in to reply
@Mark Hennings Thanks I have corrected it.
Log in to reply
1.311 for the speed of the hinge mass when the angle between the rod and the horizontal is 60 degrees. But it's rejecting that.
I'm gettingLog in to reply
@Steven Chase Sir go and rock now.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
@Steven Chase You are Welcome
@Steven Chase Sir please check your last 1 hour notification
θ is to the horizontal in the problem statement. The expression derived is by taking the angle definition as the half-angle to the vertical, so in the expression that I obtained, ϕ=θ should be 60 degrees instead of 30.
So as I understand,Thank you for posting this. This clarifies my concern about the answer.
Log in to reply
@Karan Chatrath The problem is corrected now.
@Krishna Karthik
@Karan Chatrath Thanks for the note and attempt
@Karan Chatrath sorry, yes but that type of sign are generally used in Lagrange.
The answer which is given behind the book is 2gl(1−sinθ)(4+7sin2θ)(1+15cos2θ)
Log in to reply
I have added the expression that I have found in the note.
@Karan Chatrath How do you make that beautiful figure in your attempt?
@Karan Chatrath Substituting the values in your expression gives ≈1.31146641
Log in to reply
In my expression, ϕ=π/12 and not π/6
Log in to reply
@Karan Chatrath oh yes, after substituting the correct Values I am getting 7.885
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
@Karan Chatrath at that time when you reported the problem you were saying, the answer is 0.4
By the way, i have deleted that problem and again , I have reuploaded , 2 hours ago.
Did you noticed that?
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
@Karan Chatrath if you don't mind But now putting values in your expression gives ≈1.414
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
@Karan Chatrath Now I am. Getting ≈0.175
As per again and again I put values, everytime I get a new answer.
@Lil Doug Did you solve it at all? Made any headway? Really tough problem. I used Lagrangian mech. and got 90% close to the answer.
Log in to reply
@Krishna Karthik what is tough in this. It is a medium level problem
Log in to reply
Medium level? Not in most of the stuff in the community... nope. It's kind of tough. I would rate it medium-hard.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
@Krishna Karthik ok. Can we have 1 chess match
Log in to reply
Yeah, so it's now the holidays. More math and physics :)
I've edited your comment.