My friend posed this question:
Does there exist an ordered pair satisfying ?
So far I've tried looking at properties of , at a few series representations of , and at Mahler's classification of transcendental numbers (which I can't even begin to comprehend).
I hope someone more versed in linear algebra can provide a proof of , extending to .
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
It is not known if ππ is rational, algebraic or transcendental.
If such an ordered pair exists, then ππ must be transcendental (since it is clear that b=0).
Hence, there currently does not exist a proof if such an ordered pair exists.
Kind of related: Prove that if a+b32+c34=1+32+34 for a,b,c∈Z, prove that a=b=c=1.
Log in to reply
When an integer x is not a perfect cube, the vectors x0, x1 and x2 are linearly independent? I don't know how one would go about proving that.
Log in to reply
An idea is substituting a′=a−1, b′=b−1, and c′=c−1. Then you just need to prove that given a′+b′32+c′34=0, prove that a′=b′=c′=0 which seems simpler to me.
Maybe then some casework, and we're done?
Log in to reply
b′32+c′34=−a′ and cubing both sides, rearranging gives −6b′c′(32+34)=a′3+2b′3+4c′3. Straightforward now.
Then you can rewrite asLog in to reply
32+34 is irrational because −6b′c′a′3+2b′3+4c′3 is rational.
So we just need to prove thatSuppose that 32+34 is rational. Then 1+32+341=32−1 is also rational.
So 32 must be rational. So 32=qp for coprime positive integers p,q.
Cubing both sides, 2=q3p3 so p3=2q3 so p is even.
Let p=2p′ so 8p′3=2q3 so 4p′3=q3 and q is even.
But this contradicts our original assumption that p,q are relatively prime so we are done.