For a subset of real numbers \(S\), let \(\mathbf{1}_S : \mathbb{R} \to \{0, 1\}\) be the indicator function of , defined as if and otherwise.
Prove or disprove: for every real function , there exists subsets of real numbers and real numbers such that
for all real .
Clarification: When I posted this problem, I didn't know the answer. Now, I found the answer, but I find it interesting (like most set theory stuff), so I'll let you to figure it out.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Given a real number, we can express its binary representation as …b2b1b0.b−1b−2…, where each digit bi is 0 or 1.
For an integer i, let Si be the set of real numbers x such that the ith digit in the binary representation of f(x) is equal to 1. Then f(x)=i∈Z∑2i1Si(x).