Consider the Maclaurin's series expansion of .
If you didn't know how we got here:Maclaurin Series
Differentiating with respect to on both sides we get,
The right hand side is clearly an infinite geometric series with a common ratio between consecutive terms as . By the knowledge of geometric series we can say that the right hand side should simplify to give the left hand side. If you didn't know that prove it to yourself after seeing the following wiki:
Note that the result for the sum of an infinite geometric series is under the condition that the absolute value of the common ratio is less than 1, which would imply that the series converges. But if you notice something here you can see that this expression for the left hand side holds true for all in the domain of but the right hand side doesn't. There is a limiting condition for the right hand side. Hence I seem to want to believe that this is some sort of Deja Vu and I can't seem to account for this. Could anyone please help me in this venture of mine to understand the intricacies of math? If you do, please drop a comment below. Your help will be genuinely appreciated. Cheers!
By the way if you ever wondered what the would be, where is a complex number, here you go........ I thought it would make the note colourful. Does it? .
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
The given series expansion of tan−1x holds true for ∣x∣<1. This is why the equation that you got by differentiating both sides is valid only for ∣x∣<1. Hope this helps.
Log in to reply
why does the series hold true for ∣x∣<1?
Log in to reply
Use the ratio test.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
this test?
Did you meanLog in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Consider the nth term of the series expansion of tan−1x. It is given by (−1)n−12n−1x2n−1
If the series is to convege, then the nth term should convege to zero. If ∣x∣>1, then the nth term diverges as n→∞. If ∣x∣<1, then the nth term tends to zero. Hence, a necessary condition for thhe series to convege is that ∣x∣<1. It can be shown that this condition is also sufficient for convergence of the series.
Dude u may know this famous series 1 -1/3 +1/5 -1/7 ...... Which sums up to π / 4.
And if we substitute 1 in the tan inverse expansion we get the same series.
Log in to reply
Yes. But that requires more justification.
Say r is some real number. Then LaTeX:r2+1r lies between -1 and 1. So you can plug in that value into the series.