To you, what value of $X will make these 2 payoffs equivalent:
Payoff 1 - Getting $100 for certain.
Payoff 2 - Getting $0 with 50% probability, and $X with 50% probability.
To you, what value of $Y will make these 2 payoffs equivalent:
Payoff 3 - Getting -$100 for certain.
Payoff 4 - Getting -$0 with 50% probability, and -$Y with 50% probability.
If , is there an arbitrage opportunity?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Depends on what my initial balance is.
If I begin the game with $0 in hand, I will definitely choose Payoff 1 and Payoff 4, no matter what X and Y are. (Getting guaranteed money, no matter how small, is infinitely better if you don't have any to begin with; likewise, having possibility of no need to owe anything is infinitely better even if that choice also risks the possibility of owing a massive amount, when you have nothing to begin with.)
If I begin the game with a big amount ($1 million) in hand, I'm pretty sure the cutoff point (Payoff 1 if lower, Payoff 2 if higher) for X is somewhere around 200+ϵ, and likewise for Y around 200−ϵ (Payoff 4 if lower, Payoff 3 if higher). I'm someone that believes the utility of money can be modeled logarithmically.
Log in to reply
So, you will choose payoff 1 even if X = 1000000?
And you will choose to lose $1000, instead of guaranteeing just a loss of $100?
Note that you can go negative into debt, which gets paid off in a subsequent time period. If Y was huge enough that you would declare bankruptcy with no adverse effect, then yes sometimes Payoff 4 could be better.
Log in to reply
I said it depends (heavily) on my initial balance. If I have $0 to begin with, yes, I will choose Payoff 1 even if X = $1000000; but give me about $10 to begin, and I might pick Payoff 2 instead (since I at least have backup money of $10 if I don't get the million). Likewise for the second scenario; if you have $0 to begin with, any debt at all will cause bankruptcy and thus it's better to pick Payoff 4 that has a possibility of no bankruptcy.
Using (my sense of) utility of money, where the utility of $X is U(X)=A⋅logBX for some constants A,B:
If I start with $0:
However, give any positive amount $ϵ to start with, and now U(Payoff 2)=U(X+ϵ)+U(ϵ) is finite, and so for some X it's possible that U(Payoff 2)>U(Payoff 1), in which I'm taking Payoff 2 instead.
Log in to reply
I think that people can go into debt and so my "absolute zero point" isn't $0, but more like -$100,000 (depending on age / locality / etc)
E.g. It is arguably worthwhile for some people to take on student loan debt so that they can study in a (overseas) university.
How can you ever win anything with payoff 4? If you lose money or get nothing :s
Log in to reply
That's the point: If you must choose between payoff 3 or payoff 4, which would you choose (to cut your losses)? Payoff 3 guarantees that you lose $100 while payoff 4 results in only a probability of 50% to lose $200.
Is this a serious mathematical question or a question about how bad you feel about losing?
I'd take on Payoff 2 if X>200 (preferably X>>>200). And I'd take on payoff 4 if Y≤100 ( preferably Y<<<0) ;-)
I guess it shows that I don't like to owe anybody. Lannisters always repay their debts. So do I.
Log in to reply
Never seen a lannister except for the Imp to pay his debts and you're not a lannister either are you? xD
Log in to reply
That's why I added the "So do I" part.