In a few of my solutions for trigonometry problems, I mentioned that Argand diagram shows that:
- k=1∑⌊2n⌋cosn(2k−1)π=21 and
- k=1∑⌊2n⌋cosn2kπ=−21,
where n is an odd integer, without clearly explaining it. This note explains it.
Without loss of generality, let us use n=9. Then we note that cos9kπ, where k=0,2,3,...17 are the real part of ω18 the 18th roots of unity, as e9kπ=cos9kπ+isin9kπ.
Therefore, they can be represented by a Argand diagram (left). It is easy to see from the Argand diagram that:
- k=0∑17cos9kπ=0 and
- k=0∑17sin9kπ=0
because for every root ωi there is an opposite −ω9+i.
The Argand diagram shows the fact that k=0∑n−1ωk=0, which is true for ωn=1.
Now, if we remove the even roots k=0,2,4,...16. The Argand diagram (right) is left with 9 uniform distributed odd roots. Does the Argand diagram shows that:
k=1∑9ω2k−1=0?
Yes, it does. We can check it out numerically. But can we explain it without using numerical method? Yes, I have a way which does not resort to serious algebra but classical mechanics.
Let the real and imaginary axes be replaced by x- and y axes on a horizontal plane respectively. Let the 9 roots be identical thin solid rod of unit length each with mass m and are connected firmly at the center, like the spokes of a wheel without a rim. Let the wheel be pivoted freely at the center. We can expect it to be balanced and stay horizontal because the rods are symmetrically distributed from the center. This means that the resultant moment of the wheel on any horizontal axis through the center is 0. If we take the moments about y-axis, then the resultant moment:
k=1∑921cos9(2k−1)πmg=0,
where g is acceleration due to gravity and the factor 21 is because center of mass is at the middle of the rod.
This implies that :
- k=1∑9cos9(2k−1)π=0 and similarly,
- k=1∑9sin9(2k−1)π=0 and therefore,
- k=1∑9ω2k−1=0.
We can conclude that if the complex numbers represented by an Argand diagram is symmetrical from the center the sum of the complex number is 0.
We know that cos9kπ=cos9−kπ=cos9(18−k)π, therefore,
k=1∑9cos9(2k−1)π2k=1∑4cos9(2k−1)π−cosπ2k=1∑4cos9(2k−1)π−1⇒k=1∑4cos9(2k−1)π=0=0=0=21
Therefore, showing k=1∑⌊2n⌋cosn(2k−1)π=21, when n is an odd integer. Similar explanation can be used for k=1∑⌊2n⌋cosn2kπ=−21.
#Trigonometry
#Complexroots
#ArgandDiagram
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
(√2+i√2/3)^(1+i),what is the value of it ?
Log in to reply
(2+i32)1+i=(320)1+i(103+i101)1+i=(320)(eiln320)(eitan−131)1+i=320eiln320etan−131(−1+i)=3etan−13120eiln320eitan−131=3etan−13120eiln320(103+i101)=3etan−1312(cos(ln320)+isin(ln320))(3+i)=0.811674521+i0.713337315
amazing.great piece of information! :))