You all probably know what an arithmetic sequence is. It's a sequence of numbers such that consecutive terms always have the same difference. But, there is another, more general definition: An arithmetic sequence is a sequence of real numbers such that every term in the sequence is the arithmetic mean of the preceding and the following term.
But what if we take some other mean instead of the arithmetic mean?
Other well known means are the geometric mean, the harmonic mean and the quadratic mean.
Geometric mean
The geometric mean Mg of two numbers a and b is Mg(a,b)=defab. Applied to our definition for a (now geometric) sequence {an}, this means
But this is not what I am aiming for. These means are too restrictive. However, there js a generization that involves all of these means as special cases. This is called the Hölder mean and it generalizes by introducing a new parameter p. In the case of 2 numbers a and b, their Hölder mean with parameter p is defined as
Mp(a,b)=defp2ap+bp
With these means, we can also generalize our sequences to general "p-mean sequences".
In such a sequence, the equation an=Mp(an−1,an+1) has to hold for all n.
We can rearrange this equation to get a recursive equation for any p-mean sequence
We observe something interesting; {bn} is always an arithmetic sequence. To get its general formula, let's find the formula for each p individually
p1234formulan3n−27n−615n−14
It looks like the general equation is bn=(2p−1)n−(2p−2).
Let's prove this by induction
Base case 1: n=1
b1=(2p−1)⋅1−(2p−2)=2p−1−2p+2=1
Base case 2: n=2
b2=(2p−1)⋅2−(2p−2)=2⋅2p−2⋅1−2p+2=2⋅2p−2p=2p
Induction step
Suppose bk=(2p−1)k−(2p−2) holds true for some k. Then, by the induction hypothesis (i.h.), it must also be true for bk+1.
bk+1=formula for bn2bk−bk−1=i.h.2[(2p−1)k−(2p−2)]−[(2p−1)(k−1)−(2p−2)]=2[2pk−k−2p+2]−[2pk−2p−k+1−2p+2]=2p+1k−2k−2p+1+4−2pk+2p+k−1+2p−2=2pk−k+1=(2pk−k+2p−1)−(2p−2)=(2p−1)(k+1)−(2p−2)=bk+1
Since we end up with bk+1 in the end and used the formula for bn and the definition of a p-mean sequence, this completes our proof for the formula of such a p-mean sequence
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
I still want to get the formula for a p-mean sequence with arbitrary starting values a and b and I think it won't be that difficult since I only have to linearly transform the formula for 1,2 (at least I think so).
Then, maybe I will look at the asymptotic growth of such sequences.
Whoah........!!! This is nice!!!!! Never thought about generalizing the sequences.......!!! And yup........the p mean sequence with arbitrary starting values isn't that difficult..........You can derive that easily.......... Meanwhile, I am gonna proceed with the asymptotic growth while waiting for your next update!!!
That looks reasonable! Thanks for your help; I will add this soon.
I think this also shows what one can conjecture before getting the exact formula, since larger p values increase the influence of the larger term, which is the following term because the sequences are increasing, the diffetrence between consecutive terms should decrease more and more, and this matches the p⋅.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I still want to get the formula for a p-mean sequence with arbitrary starting values a and b and I think it won't be that difficult since I only have to linearly transform the formula for 1,2 (at least I think so).
Then, maybe I will look at the asymptotic growth of such sequences.
Log in to reply
Whoah........!!! This is nice!!!!! Never thought about generalizing the sequences.......!!! And yup........the p mean sequence with arbitrary starting values isn't that difficult..........You can derive that easily.......... Meanwhile, I am gonna proceed with the asymptotic growth while waiting for your next update!!!
For starting values a and b I get bn=(bp−ap)n−(bp−2ap) and an=p(bp−ap)n−(bp−2ap)
Log in to reply
That looks reasonable! Thanks for your help; I will add this soon.
I think this also shows what one can conjecture before getting the exact formula, since larger p values increase the influence of the larger term, which is the following term because the sequences are increasing, the diffetrence between consecutive terms should decrease more and more, and this matches the p⋅.
.