The most upvoted solution in https://brilliant.org/practice/calculus-warmups-level-2-challenges/?p=6 uses some mathematical wrong methods. He splits a converging sum in 2 diverging sums, makes a index shift and subtracted $\infty$ from $\infty$ to get a final solution. Because discussions are closed, there is no possibility to warn, that this method for solution is wrong. Can a moderator help here?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I believe that you are referring to the 5th problem of that set. You could notify the solution writer here on this note using @ followed by their name and ask them to clarify their solution, (if they feel that they need to), but I suspect that the option to edit solutions is closed too, so any changes would have to be made directly by staff (and not just a moderator, (such as me)). The solution writer in question is excellent and it is not a "bad solution" but I do see your point about the splitting into diverging series; perhaps there is a more rigorous way of representing the telescoping sum, such as
1+N→∞limn=1∑N(n1−n+11)=1+N→∞lim(n=1∑Nn1−n=1∑Nn+11)=1+1+N→∞lim(n=2∑Nn1−n=2∑N+1n1)=2−N→∞limN+11=2.