f:Z→{28,29} , f(x)={29 if [x]∈{[4k]∣0≤k≤99 ∧ k∈/{25,50,75}} 28 otherwise
Find a function g:Z+∪{0}→{28,29} which is not piece-wise defined and is identical to f in its own domain.
The function you should be seeking for might not be that mathematical....
Clarifications:
- [x] denotes the congruence class of x modulo 400.
This problem is original
#NumberTheory
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I do not understand the problem. We already have defined f in the problem statement. How can we improve upon that?
Log in to reply
You have to find all f(x) which have those two properties.
Log in to reply
I think you mean a function f(x) which satisfies those two properties but is not piecewise defined?
The problem, as is currently phrased, doesn't make sense since we already have that f(x), piecewise defined! You don't find stuff that suits a definition, you define stuff and go from there.
Log in to reply
f(x)=x2 satisfies those properties.(It does not though)
I am not much familiar with "piece-wise" defined. But for instance , a function sayWell , do you guys want me to reveal the answer?
Log in to reply
I think the question you're really trying to as is "What is f better known as"?
The answer to that is f(x) is the number of days in the february of year x
Log in to reply
Correct.....
Wha do you mean by not piecewise defined?
Log in to reply
This should be helpful.
Log in to reply
I know what piecewise means. What is an example of a function not piecewise?
Log in to reply
f(x)=x2, no? I don't see a formal definition of non-piecewise anywhere, so I guess there's a scope for ambiguity. I can't do a better phrasing for a troll (not quite mathematical) problem.
Something likeLog in to reply