Prove that
∑k=0m−1(−1)k(nk)Hk=n+1n+2((−1)m+1(n+1m)(Hm−1n+2)−1n+2)\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^{m-1}{\frac{{(-1)}^k}{\binom{n}{k}} H_k} = \frac{n+1}{n+2}\left(\frac{{(-1)}^{m+1}}{\binom{n+1}{m}}\left(H_m - \frac{1}{n+2}\right) - \frac{1}{n+2}\right)k=0∑m−1(kn)(−1)kHk=n+2n+1((mn+1)(−1)m+1(Hm−n+21)−n+21)
where HmH_mHm is the mmmth Harmonic number.
PS - This is what I am getting. If you get something else, you can report.
Note by Kartik Sharma 3 years, 11 months ago
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
_italics_
**bold**
__bold__
- bulleted- list
1. numbered2. list
paragraph 1paragraph 2
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
This is a quote
# I indented these lines # 4 spaces, and now they show # up as a code block. print "hello world"
\(
\)
\[
\]
2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
We have,
S=∑k=0m−1(−1)k(nk)Hk=∑k=1m−1(−1)k(nk)Hk \text{S} = \sum_{k=0}^{m-1} \dfrac{{(-1)}^k}{\dbinom{n}{k}} H_k = \sum_{k=1}^{m-1} \dfrac{{(-1)}^k}{\dbinom{n}{k}} H_k S=k=0∑m−1(kn)(−1)kHk=k=1∑m−1(kn)(−1)kHk
=∑r=1m−1∑k=rm−11r(−1)k(nk) = \sum_{r=1}^{m-1} \sum_{k=r}^{m-1} \dfrac{1}{r} \dfrac{{(-1)}^k}{\binom{n}{k}} =r=1∑m−1k=r∑m−1r1(kn)(−1)k
=∑r=1m−11r[∑k=0m−1((−1)k(nk))−∑k=0r−1((−1)k(nk))] = \sum_{r=1}^{m-1} \dfrac{1}{r} \left[ \sum_{k=0}^{m-1} \left( \dfrac{{(-1)}^k}{\binom{n}{k}} \right) - \sum_{k=0}^{r-1} \left(\dfrac{{(-1)}^k}{\binom{n}{k}} \right) \right] =r=1∑m−1r1[k=0∑m−1((kn)(−1)k)−k=0∑r−1((kn)(−1)k)]
=∑r=1m−11r(F(m)−F(r)) = \sum_{r=1}^{m-1} \dfrac{1}{r} (F(m) - F(r)) =r=1∑m−1r1(F(m)−F(r))
From Binomial Coefficient Challenge 6,
F(m)=∑k=0m−1((−1)k(nk))=(n+1n+2)(1+(−1)m+1(n+1m))F(m) = \sum_{k=0}^{m-1} \left( \dfrac{{(-1)}^k}{\binom{n}{k}} \right) = \left(\dfrac{n+1}{n+2}\right) \left(1+\dfrac{(-1)^{m+1}}{\dbinom{n+1}{m}}\right) F(m)=k=0∑m−1((kn)(−1)k)=(n+2n+1)⎝⎜⎜⎛1+(mn+1)(−1)m+1⎠⎟⎟⎞
⟹ S=(n+1n+2)∑r=1m−11r[(−1)m+1(n+1m)−(−1)r+1(n+1r)] \implies \text{S} = \left( \dfrac{n+1}{n+2} \right) \sum_{r=1}^{m-1} \dfrac{1}{r} \left[ \dfrac{(-1)^{m+1}}{\dbinom{n+1}{m}} - \dfrac{(-1)^{r+1}}{\dbinom{n+1}{r}} \right] ⟹S=(n+2n+1)r=1∑m−1r1⎣⎢⎢⎡(mn+1)(−1)m+1−(rn+1)(−1)r+1⎦⎥⎥⎤
=(n+1n+2)[(−1)m+1(n+1m)Hm−1−∑r=1m−1(−1)r+1r(n+1r)] = \left( \dfrac{n+1}{n+2} \right) \left[ \dfrac{(-1)^{m+1}}{\dbinom{n+1}{m}} H_{m-1} - \sum_{r=1}^{m-1} \dfrac{(-1)^{r+1}}{r \dbinom{n+1}{r}} \right] =(n+2n+1)⎣⎢⎢⎡(mn+1)(−1)m+1Hm−1−r=1∑m−1r(rn+1)(−1)r+1⎦⎥⎥⎤
=(n+1n+2)[(−1)m+1(n+1m)Hm−1−1n+1∑r=0m−2(−1)r(nr)] = \left( \dfrac{n+1}{n+2} \right) \left[ \dfrac{(-1)^{m+1}}{\dbinom{n+1}{m}} H_{m-1} - \dfrac{1}{n+1} \sum_{r=0}^{m-2} \dfrac{(-1)^{r}}{ \dbinom{n}{r}} \right] =(n+2n+1)⎣⎢⎢⎡(mn+1)(−1)m+1Hm−1−n+11r=0∑m−2(rn)(−1)r⎦⎥⎥⎤
=(n+1n+2)[(−1)m+1(n+1m)Hm−1−1n+2(1+(−1)m(n+1m−1))] = \left( \dfrac{n+1}{n+2} \right) \left[ \dfrac{(-1)^{m+1}}{\dbinom{n+1}{m}} H_{m-1} - \dfrac{1}{n+2} \left( 1 + \dfrac{(-1)^m}{\dbinom{n+1}{m-1}} \right) \right] =(n+2n+1)⎣⎢⎢⎡(mn+1)(−1)m+1Hm−1−n+21⎝⎜⎜⎛1+(m−1n+1)(−1)m⎠⎟⎟⎞⎦⎥⎥⎤
Simplifying, we get,
∑k=0m−1(−1)k(nk)Hk=(n+1n+2)((−1)m+1(n+1m)(Hm−1n+2)−1n+2)□ \sum_{k=0}^{m-1} \dfrac{{(-1)}^k}{\dbinom{n}{k}} H_k = \left(\dfrac{n+1}{n+2} \right)\left( \dfrac{(-1)^{m+1}}{\dbinom{n+1}{m}} \left( H_{m} - \dfrac{1}{n+2} \right) - \dfrac{1}{n+2} \right) \quad \square k=0∑m−1(kn)(−1)kHk=(n+2n+1)⎝⎜⎜⎛(mn+1)(−1)m+1(Hm−n+21)−n+21⎠⎟⎟⎞□
The following editing may feel weird if you are seeing it for the first time.
We will use the fact that the finite sum -
∑(−1)k(nk)δk=n+1n+2(−1)k+1(n+1k)\displaystyle \sum {\frac{{(-1)}^k}{\binom{n}{k}} \delta k} = \frac{n+1}{n+2} \frac{{(-1)}^{k+1}}{\binom{n+1}{k}}∑(kn)(−1)kδk=n+2n+1(kn+1)(−1)k+1
This is proven here in BCC 6. A finite sum is just like indefinite integral, it must come with a constant but we are going to bound it eventually(where constants will cancel).
Or,
Δ(n+1n+2(−1)k+1(n+1k))=(−1)k(nk)\displaystyle \Delta\left(\frac{n+1}{n+2} \frac{{(-1)}^{k+1}}{\binom{n+1}{k}}\right) = \frac{{(-1)}^k}{\binom{n}{k}}Δ(n+2n+1(kn+1)(−1)k+1)=(kn)(−1)k
Let
S=∑(−1)k(nk)Hkδk\displaystyle S = \sum {\frac{{(-1)}^k}{\binom{n}{k}} H_k \delta k}S=∑(kn)(−1)kHkδk
Now, we use Summation By Parts -
∑u(x)Δ(v(x))=u(x)v(x)−∑v(x+1)Δ(u(x)\displaystyle \sum {u(x) \Delta(v(x))} = u(x)v(x) - \sum {v(x+1) \Delta(u(x)}∑u(x)Δ(v(x))=u(x)v(x)−∑v(x+1)Δ(u(x)
where Δ(a(x))=a(x+1)−a(x)\Delta(a(x)) = a(x+1) - a(x)Δ(a(x))=a(x+1)−a(x).
For the current sum, take u(k)=Hk,v(k)=n+1n+2(−1)k+1(n+1k)u(k) = H_k, v(k) = \frac{n+1}{n+2} \frac{{(-1)}^{k+1}}{\binom{n+1}{k}}u(k)=Hk,v(k)=n+2n+1(kn+1)(−1)k+1.
Then,
S=n+1n+2(−1)k+1(n+1k)Hk−∑n+1n+2(−1)k+2(n+1k+1)δkk+1\displaystyle S = \frac{n+1}{n+2} \frac{{(-1)}^{k+1}}{\binom{n+1}{k}} H_k - \sum {\frac{n+1}{n+2} \frac{{(-1)}^{k+2}}{\binom{n+1}{k+1}} \frac{\delta k }{k+1}}S=n+2n+1(kn+1)(−1)k+1Hk−∑n+2n+1(k+1n+1)(−1)k+2k+1δk
=n+1n+2(−1)k+1(n+1k)Hk−∑1n+2(−1)k(nk)δk\displaystyle = \frac{n+1}{n+2} \frac{{(-1)}^{k+1}}{\binom{n+1}{k}} H_k - \sum {\frac{1}{n+2} \frac{{(-1)}^{k}}{\binom{n}{k}} \delta k}=n+2n+1(kn+1)(−1)k+1Hk−∑n+21(kn)(−1)kδk
=n+1n+2(−1)k+1(n+1k)Hk−n+1(n+2)2(−1)k+1(n+1k)\displaystyle = \frac{n+1}{n+2} \frac{{(-1)}^{k+1}}{\binom{n+1}{k}} H_k - \frac{n+1}{{(n+2)}^2} \frac{{(-1)}^{k+1}}{\binom{n+1}{k}}=n+2n+1(kn+1)(−1)k+1Hk−(n+2)2n+1(kn+1)(−1)k+1
Now, we can put our bounds 000 and mmm (yes, not m−1m-1m−1)
=n+1n+2((−1)m+1(n+1m)(Hm−1n+2)−1n+2)\displaystyle = \frac{n+1}{n+2}\left(\frac{{(-1)}^{m+1}}{\binom{n+1}{m}}\left(H_m - \frac{1}{n+2}\right) - \frac{1}{n+2}\right)=n+2n+1((mn+1)(−1)m+1(Hm−n+21)−n+21)
PS - If you think I am cheating, then I must tell you that this method may not look like clever, but the theorems of finite calculus I have used(without mentioning) is just basic algebra. It simplifies many sums by cutting the repetitive tasks we would do for each sum. If you feel interested, grab a book on finite calculus.
@Mark Hennings @Ishan Singh
Check the limits on the LHS - there is no H0H_0H0.
Is there any relationship between mmm and nnn, or is this general? I can see a possible way through this one, but want to be sure as to the problem before I start...
Log in to reply
Exactly. There was this problem with H0H_0H0. I am not sure what the author is considering it. I have considered it to be zero. It doesn't really show much in the working anyway.
Yes. There is no relation between mmm and nnn.
H0H_{0}H0 is generally defined to be 000. One way to look at it is to use the integral definition,
Hn=∫01xn−1x−1 dx H_{n} = \int_{0}^{1} \dfrac{x^n - 1}{x-1} \ \mathrm{d}x Hn=∫01x−1xn−1 dx
and put n=0n=0n=0.
Btw, what was your approach?
@Ishan Singh – Summation by parts. I will post the solution tomorrow.
@Kartik Sharma – Nice. Although my approach is SBP too, just formatted differently. What about BCC11?
@Ishan Singh – Sorry for the late reply. I have written solutions for both of them. I was busy lately. Plus I do not think finite calculus is an attractive approach.
BTW,
H0=0H_0 = 0H0=0 should be true due to the generalized harmonic series given by
Hz=∑k=1∞(1k−1k+z)=∑n=2∞(−1)nζ(n)zn−1\displaystyle H_z = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}{\left(\frac{1}{k} - \frac{1}{k+z}\right)} = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}{{(-1)}^n \zeta(n) z^{n-1}}Hz=k=1∑∞(k1−k+z1)=n=2∑∞(−1)nζ(n)zn−1
It is a good exercise to find the power series expansion(i.e. to prove the second equality) of harmonic series.
There will be a (-) sign before 1n+2\dfrac{1}{n+2}n+21. Rest is fine.
I got a −-− only but then changed it because I wrongly checked for the case m=1m=1m=1. Thanks!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
We have,
S=k=0∑m−1(kn)(−1)kHk=k=1∑m−1(kn)(−1)kHk
=r=1∑m−1k=r∑m−1r1(kn)(−1)k
=r=1∑m−1r1[k=0∑m−1((kn)(−1)k)−k=0∑r−1((kn)(−1)k)]
=r=1∑m−1r1(F(m)−F(r))
From Binomial Coefficient Challenge 6,
F(m)=k=0∑m−1((kn)(−1)k)=(n+2n+1)⎝⎜⎜⎛1+(mn+1)(−1)m+1⎠⎟⎟⎞
⟹S=(n+2n+1)r=1∑m−1r1⎣⎢⎢⎡(mn+1)(−1)m+1−(rn+1)(−1)r+1⎦⎥⎥⎤
=(n+2n+1)⎣⎢⎢⎡(mn+1)(−1)m+1Hm−1−r=1∑m−1r(rn+1)(−1)r+1⎦⎥⎥⎤
=(n+2n+1)⎣⎢⎢⎡(mn+1)(−1)m+1Hm−1−n+11r=0∑m−2(rn)(−1)r⎦⎥⎥⎤
=(n+2n+1)⎣⎢⎢⎡(mn+1)(−1)m+1Hm−1−n+21⎝⎜⎜⎛1+(m−1n+1)(−1)m⎠⎟⎟⎞⎦⎥⎥⎤
Simplifying, we get,
k=0∑m−1(kn)(−1)kHk=(n+2n+1)⎝⎜⎜⎛(mn+1)(−1)m+1(Hm−n+21)−n+21⎠⎟⎟⎞□
The following editing may feel weird if you are seeing it for the first time.
We will use the fact that the finite sum -
∑(kn)(−1)kδk=n+2n+1(kn+1)(−1)k+1
This is proven here in BCC 6. A finite sum is just like indefinite integral, it must come with a constant but we are going to bound it eventually(where constants will cancel).
Or,
Δ(n+2n+1(kn+1)(−1)k+1)=(kn)(−1)k
Let
S=∑(kn)(−1)kHkδk
Now, we use Summation By Parts -
∑u(x)Δ(v(x))=u(x)v(x)−∑v(x+1)Δ(u(x)
where Δ(a(x))=a(x+1)−a(x).
For the current sum, take u(k)=Hk,v(k)=n+2n+1(kn+1)(−1)k+1.
Then,
S=n+2n+1(kn+1)(−1)k+1Hk−∑n+2n+1(k+1n+1)(−1)k+2k+1δk
=n+2n+1(kn+1)(−1)k+1Hk−∑n+21(kn)(−1)kδk
=n+2n+1(kn+1)(−1)k+1Hk−(n+2)2n+1(kn+1)(−1)k+1
Now, we can put our bounds 0 and m (yes, not m−1)
=n+2n+1((mn+1)(−1)m+1(Hm−n+21)−n+21)
PS - If you think I am cheating, then I must tell you that this method may not look like clever, but the theorems of finite calculus I have used(without mentioning) is just basic algebra. It simplifies many sums by cutting the repetitive tasks we would do for each sum. If you feel interested, grab a book on finite calculus.
@Mark Hennings @Ishan Singh
Check the limits on the LHS - there is no H0.
Is there any relationship between m and n, or is this general? I can see a possible way through this one, but want to be sure as to the problem before I start...
Log in to reply
Exactly. There was this problem with H0. I am not sure what the author is considering it. I have considered it to be zero. It doesn't really show much in the working anyway.
Yes. There is no relation between m and n.
Log in to reply
H0 is generally defined to be 0. One way to look at it is to use the integral definition,
Hn=∫01x−1xn−1 dx
and put n=0.
Btw, what was your approach?
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
BTW,
H0=0 should be true due to the generalized harmonic series given by
Hz=k=1∑∞(k1−k+z1)=n=2∑∞(−1)nζ(n)zn−1
It is a good exercise to find the power series expansion(i.e. to prove the second equality) of harmonic series.
There will be a (-) sign before n+21. Rest is fine.
Log in to reply
I got a − only but then changed it because I wrongly checked for the case m=1. Thanks!