This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
The Fibonacci polynomials Fn(x) are defined by
Fn+1(x)=xFn(x)+Fn−1(x)n≥1F0(x)=0,F1(x)=1
They have generating function
G(x,t)=n≥0∑Fn(x)tn=1−xt−t2t
Expanding this generating function we obtain, in particular, that
F2n+1(x)=j=0∑n(n−jn+j)x2j
and hence the question asks us to evaluate F2n+1(2i). Now
G(2i,t)=1−2it−t2t=(1−it)2t=m≥0∑(m+1)imtm+1
so that
F2n+1(2i)=(2n+1)i2n=(−1)n(2n+1)
Sure, and we can do the third one by replacing k+1(−1)k by xk, identifying the new series as a 3F2 hypergeometric at x, and integrating that result to obtain the desired series as the value of a 4F3 terminating hypergeometric at unity, and then throwing a bundle of hypergeometric identities at the problem. It would be nice to find a combinatoric proof instead.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
The Fibonacci polynomials Fn(x) are defined by Fn+1(x)=xFn(x)+Fn−1(x)n≥1F0(x)=0,F1(x)=1 They have generating function G(x,t)=n≥0∑Fn(x)tn=1−xt−t2t Expanding this generating function we obtain, in particular, that F2n+1(x)=j=0∑n(n−jn+j)x2j and hence the question asks us to evaluate F2n+1(2i). Now G(2i,t)=1−2it−t2t=(1−it)2t=m≥0∑(m+1)imtm+1 so that F2n+1(2i)=(2n+1)i2n=(−1)n(2n+1)
Log in to reply
Nice! In fact this can be very easily converted into Gauss hypergeometric.
Log in to reply
Sure, and we can do the third one by replacing k+1(−1)k by xk, identifying the new series as a 3F2 hypergeometric at x, and integrating that result to obtain the desired series as the value of a 4F3 terminating hypergeometric at unity, and then throwing a bundle of hypergeometric identities at the problem. It would be nice to find a combinatoric proof instead.
Log in to reply
Denote the LHS as An. Using the identity (rn)+(r−1n)=(rn+1) and re-indexing wherever required, it is easy to show that,
An+1+An−1+2An=0
Using the initial values A0=1, A1=−3, it follows that An=(−1)n(2n+1).
Log in to reply
Nice. Probably you would like this.