Prove that \(\displaystyle {p}_{n}\# >p_{n+1}^2\) for \(n \geq 4\), where \(p_k\) is the \(k\)th prime number and the primorial is defined as \(\displaystyle {p}_{n}\# = \prod_{k=1}^n p_k\).
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
Assume pn#>pn+12 for some n; this will be the inductive hypothesis. Then pn+1#>pn+13, and so we seek to prove that pn+13≥pn+22.
It is known that for n≥0, 2pn+1>pn+2 (alternate form of Bertrand's postulate). As such, cubing both sides produces pn+13>8pn+2pn+22, which implies that pn+13>pn+22 if pn+2>8. For n≥3, this is obviously true, so pn+13>pn+22 (stronger result than required), and thus pn+1#>pn+22.
The hypothesis is verifiably true for n=4. By induction, because pn#>pn+12⟶pn+1#>pn+22, we have that the hypothesis is true for all n≥4.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Assume pn#>pn+12 for some n; this will be the inductive hypothesis. Then pn+1#>pn+13, and so we seek to prove that pn+13≥pn+22.
It is known that for n≥0, 2pn+1>pn+2 (alternate form of Bertrand's postulate). As such, cubing both sides produces pn+13>8pn+2pn+22, which implies that pn+13>pn+22 if pn+2>8. For n≥3, this is obviously true, so pn+13>pn+22 (stronger result than required), and thus pn+1#>pn+22.
The hypothesis is verifiably true for n=4. By induction, because pn#>pn+12⟶pn+1#>pn+22, we have that the hypothesis is true for all n≥4.
Log in to reply
It's an inequality, by the way. An identity is an exact equivalence.
Clever way to go about it, did not the alternate form.
Brilliant! I am gonna save this solution(I've learned it from Pi Han Goh).