This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
There are some recent books devoted to this issue, including Talent Is Overrated, The Talent Code, and Outliers: The Story of Success.
According to Talent Is Overrated, the keys to world class performance are: 1) start as early in life as possible, 2) have a good, dedicated coach, and 3) put in ~10,000 hours of "deliberate practice," which is a kind of practice where you repeatedly identify and work on your weaknesses in the field. IQ is said to be more of a gateway than a guarantee of success. That is, a certain base level of IQ is probably required to function as, say, an astrophysicist. Once you have sufficient IQ to function within a field, however, more IQ gives very sharply diminishing returns, and success is much more a function of the other three things mentioned.
I don't know how much I buy it, personally. Physically, some folks have gifts that others of us do not. Most folks, for instance, will require years of training before they can deadlift 500 pounds. A few gifted people, however, can deadlift that the first time they ever try. I don't see why the same thing wouldn't be true of mental abilities. That said, even the gifted must practice a lot to be world class.
I think what most likely happens is that a child has a certain inclination to one field, and then investigates that field. Then he or she will become smarter in that field because he or she has started at an earlier age. For example, people on brilliant have probably been doing math a lot longer than normal people. But I bet you that these Brilliant people haven't excelled with their writing courses like others have.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
There are some recent books devoted to this issue, including Talent Is Overrated, The Talent Code, and Outliers: The Story of Success.
According to Talent Is Overrated, the keys to world class performance are: 1) start as early in life as possible, 2) have a good, dedicated coach, and 3) put in ~10,000 hours of "deliberate practice," which is a kind of practice where you repeatedly identify and work on your weaknesses in the field. IQ is said to be more of a gateway than a guarantee of success. That is, a certain base level of IQ is probably required to function as, say, an astrophysicist. Once you have sufficient IQ to function within a field, however, more IQ gives very sharply diminishing returns, and success is much more a function of the other three things mentioned.
I don't know how much I buy it, personally. Physically, some folks have gifts that others of us do not. Most folks, for instance, will require years of training before they can deadlift 500 pounds. A few gifted people, however, can deadlift that the first time they ever try. I don't see why the same thing wouldn't be true of mental abilities. That said, even the gifted must practice a lot to be world class.
Log in to reply
Thanks for such a well explained answer, it sure gave a few points to ponder.
I think what most likely happens is that a child has a certain inclination to one field, and then investigates that field. Then he or she will become smarter in that field because he or she has started at an earlier age. For example, people on brilliant have probably been doing math a lot longer than normal people. But I bet you that these Brilliant people haven't excelled with their writing courses like others have.
Log in to reply
Err, some users here are better at physics than math. (I suppose) And some people are really smart at almost all fields.
But whether they are gifted or not, everyone have to work hard to become what they want to be.