For an integer , John has cards numbered from 2 to and he wants to put them in two boxes according to the following rule:
If and are the numbers of two cards and , then the cards with these numbers are in different boxes.
What's the biggest number for which it is possible for John to keep following this rule?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I tried this until n=15 and it failed there so I think the answer is 14 but it isn't a very elegant proof (brute force never is ahah)
I can only get up to n=6.
Call the boxes box A and box B. The number 2 has to go somewhere, so let's just put it in box A.
Since 3 divides 22−1, the number 3 has to go in box B. Since 3 divides 24−1 and 26−1, the numbers 4 and 6 have to go in box A. Since 5 divides 24−1, the number 5 has to go in box B. Thus, we can place the numbers 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Furthermore, the placement of these numbers is forced, i.e. this is the only possible way. (We can swap the numbers in box A and box B, but it's basically the same.)
Now, 7 divides 23−1 and 26−1, so we cannot place the number 7 in either box. This means n=6 is as high as we can go.
@Jon Haussmann You're right. I made a mistake at n=7. Do you think there's any better way to prove this? I can't come up with anything other than this brute force method.
Log in to reply
I don't see any other way. And it's pretty easy to go up to n=7, so I wouldn't call it brute force.